Women becoming opposed to it (in a poll, thereby requiring no effort on their part and the expectation that men will have to do it) at this point is like finally going to the doctor once that infected cut has caused gangrene.
Of course it hasn't changed anything, its just meaningless virtue signalling once things got so bad it couldn't be denied anymore.
What do you mean? If women are the source of all these problems then that means they are the sovereign. If they are the sovereign then their preferences should be reflected in public policy should they not?
Many things in life are easy to go down and hard to go back. This is especially true when it comes to things like law, politics and demographics.
So its easy for them to vote it into place, and near impossible to (civilly) undo once it is. Super easy to virtue signal about being against it, especially once the consequences come home to roost, though.
They are the source because they provided the power and authority to the Powers That Be, mostly through voting Left consistently and easily. This doesn't mean they are the ones in charge in any way.
It's not actually hard to deport people let alone merely stop taking more in. The hard part is not having your immigration restrictionist movement subverted. That's what keeps happening in the West, not lack of electoral victories.
If they are providing power, why can't they take it away? This theory of power makes no sense to me.
That's why I said doing it civilly. Its easy to just physically and violently remove. Otherwise it will always be hamstringed and distorted, whether through direct subversives or simple emotional manipulation of voters, something women are particularly weak to. Its why the meme of "14 images that'll make you say fuck having borders" keeps repeating, its effective at returning them to the fold.
And they already provided the power, an action that cannot be undone as simply as "I oppose this now!" Once lodged, its very hard to dislodge.
Women becoming opposed to it (in a poll, thereby requiring no effort on their part and the expectation that men will have to do it) at this point is like finally going to the doctor once that infected cut has caused gangrene.
Of course it hasn't changed anything, its just meaningless virtue signalling once things got so bad it couldn't be denied anymore.
What do you mean? If women are the source of all these problems then that means they are the sovereign. If they are the sovereign then their preferences should be reflected in public policy should they not?
Many things in life are easy to go down and hard to go back. This is especially true when it comes to things like law, politics and demographics.
So its easy for them to vote it into place, and near impossible to (civilly) undo once it is. Super easy to virtue signal about being against it, especially once the consequences come home to roost, though.
They are the source because they provided the power and authority to the Powers That Be, mostly through voting Left consistently and easily. This doesn't mean they are the ones in charge in any way.
It's not actually hard to deport people let alone merely stop taking more in. The hard part is not having your immigration restrictionist movement subverted. That's what keeps happening in the West, not lack of electoral victories.
If they are providing power, why can't they take it away? This theory of power makes no sense to me.
That's why I said doing it civilly. Its easy to just physically and violently remove. Otherwise it will always be hamstringed and distorted, whether through direct subversives or simple emotional manipulation of voters, something women are particularly weak to. Its why the meme of "14 images that'll make you say fuck having borders" keeps repeating, its effective at returning them to the fold.
And they already provided the power, an action that cannot be undone as simply as "I oppose this now!" Once lodged, its very hard to dislodge.