First joggers, now it's sitters
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Blacks are circling their wagons claiming the nigger was 'acting in self defense', allegations that he was caught stealing won't change their stance.
Yeah, the wagon circling by the hardcore dindu's is always a foregone conclusion, but the fewer other idiots that still support them the better.
Basically it's a hunt to find if the victim said anything racist. One n-bomb in a text anywhere and the killer goes free.
and yet 1000's of anti-White remarks from the pos or his friends will be laughed away as without merit, or just words...
Did you forget that liberals redefined racism? Racism is very bad, but blacks literally CAN’T be racist now.
So self-defense is okay then? Rittenhouse did nothing wrong and you should be able to bring a gun anywhere.
Same as looting: it's OK based on skin colour, facts need not apply.
They're claiming the victim "laid hands on him" and that justifies self defense with a knife to the heart.
His brother says he moved the killer's backpack & was immediately stabbed.
In any case, the Media will either ignore this or spin it that the Black was the victim. As always.
Who knows if this is true, but it makes a lot more sense than telling him to move. Explains the backpack angle too.
I'd believe it, but is there any source on this? Video? Eyewitness account? If not, its just as bullshit as the mainstream narrative.
A black teen bringing a knife to school and getting extremely confrontational when asked to leave a tent hes not supposed to be in? There's zero innocence in that story.
Except the victim and his family.
There's no innocence, but picking one narrative over another usually requires something grounded.
Its a jogger, bringing a knife to school and stabbing someone over something incredibly stupid and nonsensical is equally believable. I know because I went to high school with them and it was always on the table daily.
"Picking narratives?" The only point in that activity is so you can uncritically repeat the narrative later. Why on earth would you do that?
Meanwhile the post actually poses this problem as a question probably to coax you into reasoning about this for yourself. So far this is the most reasonable explanation for this unusual situation.
No, its a reasonable assumption. Which is why the original guy was asking for anything to turn it from that into reality instead of just a narrative. Just so that we can repeat it going forward without as much hesitation on its reliability.
There is nothing "unusual" about a nigger being armed and chimping out, they do that regularly on their own with no logic to be understood behind it. Its a general trait of theirs independent of anything happening around it.
We didn't need any form of backstory to understand what happened, because of how not-unusual it is. All of us just easily understood that nigs gonna nig. So the assigning of details like this is nice to have some confirmation rather than just making up our own stories unnecessarily.
...and /to/ their own. that's what makes this unusual.
which is why it's in the news?
Again. It's just reasoning and thinking about things. Only a retard would do this then walk around saying they absolutely knew what happened. That's just a retarded version of virtue signaling with more steps. This is just a conversation. Which is why it's posed as a question.
Informed discussion can lead to targeted investigation which can lead to confirmation or in better directions. It's a necessary step to discover truth.
God I wish. Anywhere with blacks around this isn't uncommon. Their very existence is danger upon all around. I literally had to be told about areas of both my town and school that if I went there, nobody would care about what happened to me because I was asking for it.
Can you guess what made those areas special? I'll give you a hint, everyone there blended in at night.
Random events go viral all the time. Floyd was just a random nigger that died among many that year, and every year prior. A kid I went to school with was killed by his mom's black drug dealer, and he was an elementary schooler. It barely even made the local news despite being similarly tragic.
Again, the point isn't that its an unreasonable assumption. It was just a question about if it was anything more than just an assumption. Treating "a black kid had a knife and killed a white one" as something super special and unique that it needs a backstory to understand is giving negros too much credit about being civilized.
Was this a black school? Were there a lot of black kids at the event? Or was the White kid somehow asking for it is what you're saying? How are your childhood experiences specifically relevant to this situation?
Then there's no sense trying to understand anything. Or "pick a narrative."
It's unique and the story put out so far is so clearly bullshit that it invites the question. You're putting out a lot of effort to simply avoid thinking about this specifically. It's weird.
Obviously the kid was looking for an excuse to use the knife but proof of the stealing needs to be present. I know retards are all over the internet are sharing stills like this to defend the murderer. If we do the same dumb shit we undermine the issue.
Just what to say, no matter what the facts shake out to be, I appreciate the questioning, as a fell PON (Person of Nuance.)
Killer's a scumbag no matter what, but who knows what the exact circumstances are. We'll have to wait and see.
Uh... maybe some do. Tents are usually for teams (schools) to stake out a space for their athletes during a meet. It is correct that it can be easy to steal from others at track meets.
Is there anything to corroborate this beyond a .jpg?
Pattern recognition
The problem with that answer is that you don't need to add theft as a motive to make things make sense. "Feral dindu chimps out over minor disagreement" fits the pattern in a very general sense, especially when you throw in rival schools in a competitive environment. Sure, it's possible he was caught stealing, but it's not necessary to add that to come to a plausible explanation of what happened; some non-theft explanations that fit the general pattern would also be:
While "he was stealing" is, in general, a strong possibility, there's just not enough information known to rule out other options as well. I mean, you could also say "actually, he was there to creep on so and so's girlfriend!" and that fits certain stereotypes too. Doesn't necessarily make it true.
Get the fuck out of here with this shit bro. At least source your fucking .jpg if you're gonna make baseless claims off an image someone else cooked up. I swear to god you guys are getting sloppy and have zero skepticism. "Oh someone spent a few minutes in some image editing software creating some agitprop to post to my social media feed, must be gospel truth."
Is it plausible that a nigger stabbed someone after they got caught stealing? 110%.
Do even we know that the image above is of the track event in question? Absolutely not. Could be some stadium from some European country for all we know.
Was it even raining that day? I heard the "he was seeking shelter from the rain" excuse early on. 😑 Not that it IS an excuse for stabbing someone, but lefties will swallow anything!
How many white athletes die like this? Why don't their parents fight back?