A black teen bringing a knife to school and getting extremely confrontational when asked to leave a tent hes not supposed to be in? There's zero innocence in that story.
There's no innocence, but picking one narrative over another usually requires something grounded.
Its a jogger, bringing a knife to school and stabbing someone over something incredibly stupid and nonsensical is equally believable. I know because I went to high school with them and it was always on the table daily.
"Picking narratives?" The only point in that activity is so you can uncritically repeat the narrative later. Why on earth would you do that?
Meanwhile the post actually poses this problem as a question probably to coax you into reasoning about this for yourself. So far this is the most reasonable explanation for this unusual situation.
the most reasonable explanation for this unusual situation.
No, its a reasonable assumption. Which is why the original guy was asking for anything to turn it from that into reality instead of just a narrative. Just so that we can repeat it going forward without as much hesitation on its reliability.
There is nothing "unusual" about a nigger being armed and chimping out, they do that regularly on their own with no logic to be understood behind it. Its a general trait of theirs independent of anything happening around it.
We didn't need any form of backstory to understand what happened, because of how not-unusual it is. All of us just easily understood that nigs gonna nig. So the assigning of details like this is nice to have some confirmation rather than just making up our own stories unnecessarily.
...and /to/ their own. that's what makes this unusual.
because of how not-unusual it is.
which is why it's in the news?
rather than just making up our own stories unnecessarily.
Again. It's just reasoning and thinking about things. Only a retard would do this then walk around saying they absolutely knew what happened. That's just a retarded version of virtue signaling with more steps. This is just a conversation. Which is why it's posed as a question.
Informed discussion can lead to targeted investigation which can lead to confirmation or in better directions. It's a necessary step to discover truth.
Obviously the kid was looking for an excuse to use the knife but proof of the stealing needs to be present. I know retards are all over the internet are sharing stills like this to defend the murderer. If we do the same dumb shit we undermine the issue.
A black teen bringing a knife to school and getting extremely confrontational when asked to leave a tent hes not supposed to be in? There's zero innocence in that story.
Except the victim and his family.
There's no innocence, but picking one narrative over another usually requires something grounded.
Its a jogger, bringing a knife to school and stabbing someone over something incredibly stupid and nonsensical is equally believable. I know because I went to high school with them and it was always on the table daily.
"Picking narratives?" The only point in that activity is so you can uncritically repeat the narrative later. Why on earth would you do that?
Meanwhile the post actually poses this problem as a question probably to coax you into reasoning about this for yourself. So far this is the most reasonable explanation for this unusual situation.
No, its a reasonable assumption. Which is why the original guy was asking for anything to turn it from that into reality instead of just a narrative. Just so that we can repeat it going forward without as much hesitation on its reliability.
There is nothing "unusual" about a nigger being armed and chimping out, they do that regularly on their own with no logic to be understood behind it. Its a general trait of theirs independent of anything happening around it.
We didn't need any form of backstory to understand what happened, because of how not-unusual it is. All of us just easily understood that nigs gonna nig. So the assigning of details like this is nice to have some confirmation rather than just making up our own stories unnecessarily.
...and /to/ their own. that's what makes this unusual.
which is why it's in the news?
Again. It's just reasoning and thinking about things. Only a retard would do this then walk around saying they absolutely knew what happened. That's just a retarded version of virtue signaling with more steps. This is just a conversation. Which is why it's posed as a question.
Informed discussion can lead to targeted investigation which can lead to confirmation or in better directions. It's a necessary step to discover truth.
Obviously the kid was looking for an excuse to use the knife but proof of the stealing needs to be present. I know retards are all over the internet are sharing stills like this to defend the murderer. If we do the same dumb shit we undermine the issue.