First joggers, now it's sitters
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
No, its a reasonable assumption. Which is why the original guy was asking for anything to turn it from that into reality instead of just a narrative. Just so that we can repeat it going forward without as much hesitation on its reliability.
There is nothing "unusual" about a nigger being armed and chimping out, they do that regularly on their own with no logic to be understood behind it. Its a general trait of theirs independent of anything happening around it.
We didn't need any form of backstory to understand what happened, because of how not-unusual it is. All of us just easily understood that nigs gonna nig. So the assigning of details like this is nice to have some confirmation rather than just making up our own stories unnecessarily.
...and /to/ their own. that's what makes this unusual.
which is why it's in the news?
Again. It's just reasoning and thinking about things. Only a retard would do this then walk around saying they absolutely knew what happened. That's just a retarded version of virtue signaling with more steps. This is just a conversation. Which is why it's posed as a question.
Informed discussion can lead to targeted investigation which can lead to confirmation or in better directions. It's a necessary step to discover truth.
God I wish. Anywhere with blacks around this isn't uncommon. Their very existence is danger upon all around. I literally had to be told about areas of both my town and school that if I went there, nobody would care about what happened to me because I was asking for it.
Can you guess what made those areas special? I'll give you a hint, everyone there blended in at night.
Random events go viral all the time. Floyd was just a random nigger that died among many that year, and every year prior. A kid I went to school with was killed by his mom's black drug dealer, and he was an elementary schooler. It barely even made the local news despite being similarly tragic.
Again, the point isn't that its an unreasonable assumption. It was just a question about if it was anything more than just an assumption. Treating "a black kid had a knife and killed a white one" as something super special and unique that it needs a backstory to understand is giving negros too much credit about being civilized.
Was this a black school? Were there a lot of black kids at the event? Or was the White kid somehow asking for it is what you're saying? How are your childhood experiences specifically relevant to this situation?
Then there's no sense trying to understand anything. Or "pick a narrative."
It's unique and the story put out so far is so clearly bullshit that it invites the question. You're putting out a lot of effort to simply avoid thinking about this specifically. It's weird.
It was just the South. Where blacks exist everywhere. Meaning we have regular interactions with them to have experience in how they act and what they do. That's why its relevant.
I'd like to think knowledge is its own reward, such as knowing the narrative of what happened that day. Why the news media and social media do what they do is irrelevant to that.
And I'm saying its not, and you are putting in a lot of effort to try and act like we don't live in a country where this is a common occurrence. Even the "media approved" narrative being obviously bullshit is literally what happens everytime and why we have memes like "dindu nuffin" and "jogger" to begin with.
If you haven't been paying attention ever, it might seem unique. But this is no different than any of the other viral nigger crime stories.