Get the fuck out of here with this shit bro. At least source your fucking .jpg if you're gonna make baseless claims off an image someone else cooked up. I swear to god you guys are getting sloppy and have zero skepticism. "Oh someone spent a few minutes in some image editing software creating some agitprop to post to my social media feed, must be gospel truth."

Is it plausible that a nigger stabbed someone after they got caught stealing? 110%.

Do even we know that the image above is of the track event in question? Absolutely not. Could be some stadium from some European country for all we know.

The problem with that answer is that you don't need to add theft as a motive to make things make sense. "Feral dindu chimps out over minor disagreement" fits the pattern in a very general sense, especially when you throw in rival schools in a competitive environment. Sure, it's possible he was caught stealing, but it's not necessary to add that to come to a plausible explanation of what happened; some non-theft explanations that fit the general pattern would also be:

• He was there to hassle the rival school
• He was there to try to meet/see/hassle a specific person he knew
• He really did just go to the wrong area

While "he was stealing" is, in general, a strong possibility, there's just not enough information known to rule out other options as well. I mean, you could also say "actually, he was there to creep on so and so's girlfriend!" and that fits certain stereotypes too. Doesn't necessarily make it true.