Anyone else notice the number of Ramadan pieces run on NPR and similar outlets this year? When's the last time they celebrated the preparation for the most important Christian holy day?
When I was about seven or eight, I attended a Passover service at my church. There was apparently a tradition that the oldest son was supposed to go out and see if the Messiah was here. I, confused and bemused, played along. My dad, the pastor, looped it back to our belief that He has already come. I remember thinking "This is really dumb and weird. Who are they looking for if Jesus already came?"
Our beliefs are fundamentally incompatible. The very foundation of our beliefs, they reject and keep looking for someone "better." Saying "Christ is King" in a confrontational way probably isn't the best use of His name, but it does highlight the fact that we truly don't serve the same God. Or maybe, to be more precise, they don't serve God, they try to pull shenanigans on Him.
The very foundation of our beliefs, they reject and keep looking for someone "better."
Not just reject, they put it on record that they outright hate him and believe he burns in pig shit in hell. A truly vile level belief for a guy who even if you don't believe was probably one of the most milquetoast and good religious figures in history in terms of message.
Jesus's entire ministry on earth was rebuking the Pharisees, scribes, and Sadducees, right to their faces, calling them liars, hypocrites, prideful, sinful, children of satan, a den of vipers, murderers and thieves, unworthy of the kingdom of God. He flipped their tables, whipped them, and threw them out of the temple. He pissed them off so much they conspired to murder Him, but Jesus had so much public support they could only snatch Him in the middle of the night. And, Revelation paints how brutal Jesus will be toward His enemies when He returns.
Those are things he did (and/or will do), not things he preached though. 2A support was something preached, actually ordered followers to do. Someone chimping out on a bunch of Jews and Jupiter-worshippers using a church as a bank really isn't the best example. It's the most popular one, and its cathartic, but the outright order to sell your cloak in order to buy swords really is a clearer example of militarism in biblical teachings.
EDIT: corrected which mythology was using that Church at the time.
Well, the bible continues on after that "sell your cloak and buy one" bit. Where, in those later chapters of the bible, do Christians ever start fighting and using those swords? Never.
Instead, after Peter struck the ear of the slave of the high priest, Jesus told him to put away his sword, healed the slave's ear with a touch, and said to Peter "those who live by the sword, die by the sword". You should remember that Jesus told them all to get swords right before he was to be taken away. Yet he did not allow them to fight in his defense. Why? Because his Kingdom, and theirs, was not of this world.
What was the point of the swords then? To use as a prop in order to teach them what not to do. Also, it was necessary to fulfill prophecy: Luke 22:37
Relative to most other major religious figure across the globe, yeah he was pretty milquetoast. His responses were often pretty proportionate and rational in a lot of cases, where the point was respect and discipline.
Compared to most others where it was "you didn't suck my cock hard enough and offer me more gold than exists in reality, end your bloodline and morph you into a monster."
If you read the Talmud (which as a lowly goy you aren't supposed to do) you see what an unflattering portrayal it paints of both jews and their god, which is supposedly a mark of pride for them. http://www.come-and-hear.com/talmud/
Pre-war it was generally believed that the jewish god was Satan and "Javeh" was just another name for same.
Yeah the way some fags go along with trying to use "Christ is king " as a euphemism is disgraceful and blasphemous. Literally playing into the narrative the fags OP mentions want.
The narcissists, hedonists and psychopaths occupy the fringes, wherever they can obtain power and, using God's name, attempt to subvert the power of the divine to their own devices. A warning: Not everyone who says "Lord, Lord" will enter the Kingdom of Heaven.
The irony is so thick, you could cut it with a knife.
Peterson lost his career for being a moderate. I don't feel bad for him because he make his shekels working for Ben Shaprio these days. I still watch him because he does have some ideas I'd like to hear with an occasional "safe" radical guest, but he's a broken man who was, at his best, a Canadian moderate.
So he thinks traditional Christian values are better than Marxist degeneracy? Good, does he want a cookie? How does he think those values were established and enforced? Podcasts? He is a man that has a fair notion of what strength is and possesses very little.
I will once again gloat that I've said it since Peterson came on the scene: he's only useful for dudes who didn't have fathers to teach them the basics of manhood. You could read classical literature and glean as much as he has to offer
Sure, I'll eat a bit of crow, but I still caution against eating "our own" like leftists. Even today non-Progressives have a dearth of non Marxist academics, especially intelligent well spoken ones. I'm concerned that turning people always from the like of Peterson is self defeating even if he is now owned by the Daily Wire (and it shows).
Sure, I'll eat a bit of crow, but I still caution against eating "our own" like leftists.
Leftists routinely eat their own, and all it got them was complete control over western civilization. Conservatives have routinely put up with controlled opposition within our ranks, and all it got us was our own governments trying to replace us with imported third worlders.
MAGA is the first successful right wing movement in several decades, and we are now being told that we should be more accomodating to traitors like all failed past right wing movements have been. Curious, that.
Peterson and his ilk are not on "our side". They are saboteurs working on bringing us down from within. If you trust him, you are a fool.
I'm inclined to agree, but what do we do without his ilk? My opinion is that all western thought went to shit with the humanists three hundred years ago. Descartes's "i think therefore i am" wasn't clever, it was a proto Wheadon-esque response to Aristotle trying to punch him for being stupid.
Peterson is so fucking opposed to prescriptive morality, and then tells his supporters to do as his employer says. Fuck him.
The problem is the right is weak and quite unintelligent. So the only leaders they have are stuffed puppets handed to them to play with with. Peterson, Trump, RFK, etc. Eventually the time will come to realize these toys are a distraction from the elephant in the room.
I'm sure that most Christians wouldn't be so petty as to say "Christ is King" out of spite. Hell, that could probably be seen as blasphemous for taking God's name in vain.
But I'll be happy to say it in their place to any jackass that has a problem with it.
I wouldn't say it out of spite but I am ok with being beheaded for saying it, I'll pray for them till my last breath, just like Stephen did. Such is life.
I (personally) have not been instructed to shoot and I think you don't know what you're talking about, we are being killed for words and less all over the world right now.
just got home from volunteering to help flood victims in my country. didn't find any of those weapon caches that you fake right-wingers lost in your 'tragic boating accidents'.
we all know the only time you fakes will take up guns is to kill white christian europeans. you know, the guys the usa was actually founded by and for.
sure that most Christians wouldn't be so petty as to say "Christ is King" out of spite. Hell, that could probably be seen as blasphemous for taking God's name in vain.
Two thoughts. First, if we believe it's true, can it be in vain? This whole thing is to make Christians afraid of speaking what aught to be a basic Truth to Christian communities. Hell, "king' is selling the incarnate godhead short. Why are these people trying to make the God of the Christians less than 'king"?
Two, say it for us if you will, but remember, we do believe it. At least those of us that actually believe our religion, that is.
Two thoughts. First, if we believe it's true, can it be in vain?
Yes. If you say "Christ is King" while promoting manifestly unchristian behavior, you are implying that Christ endorses you and cheapening the name. This is the definition of taking God's name in vain.
I supported Candace Owens when she proclaimed Christ is King after the Daily Wire tried to persecute her for her faith. I like Jake Shields but he can't be saying Christ is King while unrepentantly living an unchristian lifestyle.
Not to beat a dead horse, but Nick Fuentes saying Christ is King while laughing at groyper rape memes is disgusting.
This is basically the reason the book of Isaiah was written. The Jews were patting themselves on the back for worshiping God, but they were told their proclamations were worse than useless considering their deeds.
Having said all that, the Daily Wire is the only reason we're talking about this at all because they can't bring themselves to admit they simply lost the moral high ground to Candace over Gaza.
"Christ is king". I'm not Christian, but I'm saying it in solidarity. It is not stated in vain, because it serves a purpose, it was not all in vain, because it begets results. Trolls mad. That's a valid result; speaking down to blasphemers and heretics.
Hell, "king' is selling the incarnate godhead short.
Two thoughts. First, saying "Hell" here is highly ironic. Second, that's the standard title. "Glory to the newborn king". "The lord is my shepherd" (lord is a nobility pronoun). "Christ the lord". All very common parlances in standard Christian song and rhetoric.
First, if we believe it's true, can it be in vain?
I'm not an expert here. My assumption would be that the motivation/mens rea behind it would be the distinction. Saying it to affirm it or to inform someone seems like it would be just fine to me. Saying it to knock someone else or put them in their place ... I dunno. I can't speak for God, but I think he might give someone a side-eye for that.
Two, say it for us if you will, but remember, we do believe it
Eh, I believe it as well in a different manner.
Religion, whether true or not, is what builds civilization.
There is no civilization that I would want to live in except the ones built by Christianity. Even if none of the supernatural stuff is 100% true ... by its fruits shall you know it.
“Resist it while you still can... the barbarian never take the city until someone holds the gates open for them and it’s your own preachers and multicultural authorities who’ll do it for you...”
The timing of this with Lent is not coincidental.
Anyone else notice the number of Ramadan pieces run on NPR and similar outlets this year? When's the last time they celebrated the preparation for the most important Christian holy day?
Pick one.
Easter, you twit.
Lent is the catholic observation, however.
When I was about seven or eight, I attended a Passover service at my church. There was apparently a tradition that the oldest son was supposed to go out and see if the Messiah was here. I, confused and bemused, played along. My dad, the pastor, looped it back to our belief that He has already come. I remember thinking "This is really dumb and weird. Who are they looking for if Jesus already came?"
Our beliefs are fundamentally incompatible. The very foundation of our beliefs, they reject and keep looking for someone "better." Saying "Christ is King" in a confrontational way probably isn't the best use of His name, but it does highlight the fact that we truly don't serve the same God. Or maybe, to be more precise, they don't serve God, they try to pull shenanigans on Him.
Not just reject, they put it on record that they outright hate him and believe he burns in pig shit in hell. A truly vile level belief for a guy who even if you don't believe was probably one of the most milquetoast and good religious figures in history in terms of message.
Jesus, milquetoast?
Have you read the Bible?
The modern judaized Christian church certainly likes to portray Jesus as some peace loving pacifist hippy, but that is the opposite of the truth.
"If you're not carrying a piece, sell the shirt off your back and get a gat instead." -Jesus, but, you know, actually unironically, look it up.
Jesus's entire ministry on earth was rebuking the Pharisees, scribes, and Sadducees, right to their faces, calling them liars, hypocrites, prideful, sinful, children of satan, a den of vipers, murderers and thieves, unworthy of the kingdom of God. He flipped their tables, whipped them, and threw them out of the temple. He pissed them off so much they conspired to murder Him, but Jesus had so much public support they could only snatch Him in the middle of the night. And, Revelation paints how brutal Jesus will be toward His enemies when He returns.
Those are things he did (and/or will do), not things he preached though. 2A support was something preached, actually ordered followers to do. Someone chimping out on a bunch of Jews and Jupiter-worshippers using a church as a bank really isn't the best example. It's the most popular one, and its cathartic, but the outright order to sell your cloak in order to buy swords really is a clearer example of militarism in biblical teachings.
EDIT: corrected which mythology was using that Church at the time.
Well, the bible continues on after that "sell your cloak and buy one" bit. Where, in those later chapters of the bible, do Christians ever start fighting and using those swords? Never.
Instead, after Peter struck the ear of the slave of the high priest, Jesus told him to put away his sword, healed the slave's ear with a touch, and said to Peter "those who live by the sword, die by the sword". You should remember that Jesus told them all to get swords right before he was to be taken away. Yet he did not allow them to fight in his defense. Why? Because his Kingdom, and theirs, was not of this world.
What was the point of the swords then? To use as a prop in order to teach them what not to do. Also, it was necessary to fulfill prophecy: Luke 22:37
Relative to most other major religious figure across the globe, yeah he was pretty milquetoast. His responses were often pretty proportionate and rational in a lot of cases, where the point was respect and discipline.
Compared to most others where it was "you didn't suck my cock hard enough and offer me more gold than exists in reality, end your bloodline and morph you into a monster."
Kapparot ritual as well. Christ, sinless, died for our sins. They seek to kill for their (continuing) sins.
Rev 2:9 and 3:9 etc. etc.
If you read the Talmud (which as a lowly goy you aren't supposed to do) you see what an unflattering portrayal it paints of both jews and their god, which is supposedly a mark of pride for them. http://www.come-and-hear.com/talmud/
Pre-war it was generally believed that the jewish god was Satan and "Javeh" was just another name for same.
Yeah the way some fags go along with trying to use "Christ is king " as a euphemism is disgraceful and blasphemous. Literally playing into the narrative the fags OP mentions want.
Peterson himself calling out Christ is King
Also looks like the tweet i linked to got deleted. Here's another
The irony is so thick, you could cut it with a knife.
I wonder what Mr. Peterson has to say about Revelation 3:9 and the New Testament condemnation of pharmakeia as demonic?
Peterson lost his career for being a moderate. I don't feel bad for him because he make his shekels working for Ben Shaprio these days. I still watch him because he does have some ideas I'd like to hear with an occasional "safe" radical guest, but he's a broken man who was, at his best, a Canadian moderate.
So he thinks traditional Christian values are better than Marxist degeneracy? Good, does he want a cookie? How does he think those values were established and enforced? Podcasts? He is a man that has a fair notion of what strength is and possesses very little.
I will once again gloat that I've said it since Peterson came on the scene: he's only useful for dudes who didn't have fathers to teach them the basics of manhood. You could read classical literature and glean as much as he has to offer
Sure, I'll eat a bit of crow, but I still caution against eating "our own" like leftists. Even today non-Progressives have a dearth of non Marxist academics, especially intelligent well spoken ones. I'm concerned that turning people always from the like of Peterson is self defeating even if he is now owned by the Daily Wire (and it shows).
Leftists routinely eat their own, and all it got them was complete control over western civilization. Conservatives have routinely put up with controlled opposition within our ranks, and all it got us was our own governments trying to replace us with imported third worlders.
MAGA is the first successful right wing movement in several decades, and we are now being told that we should be more accomodating to traitors like all failed past right wing movements have been. Curious, that.
Peterson and his ilk are not on "our side". They are saboteurs working on bringing us down from within. If you trust him, you are a fool.
I'm inclined to agree, but what do we do without his ilk? My opinion is that all western thought went to shit with the humanists three hundred years ago. Descartes's "i think therefore i am" wasn't clever, it was a proto Wheadon-esque response to Aristotle trying to punch him for being stupid.
Peterson is so fucking opposed to prescriptive morality, and then tells his supporters to do as his employer says. Fuck him.
The problem is the right is weak and quite unintelligent. So the only leaders they have are stuffed puppets handed to them to play with with. Peterson, Trump, RFK, etc. Eventually the time will come to realize these toys are a distraction from the elephant in the room.
He has a good take on raising a daughter though: https://web.archive.org/web/20190821154212/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8-cjd5cdIU
How the fuck is anyone defending this faggot at this point? It's beyond clear who his masters are.
Christ is King.
I'm sure that most Christians wouldn't be so petty as to say "Christ is King" out of spite. Hell, that could probably be seen as blasphemous for taking God's name in vain.
But I'll be happy to say it in their place to any jackass that has a problem with it.
I wouldn't say it out of spite but I am ok with being beheaded for saying it, I'll pray for them till my last breath, just like Stephen did. Such is life.
Deus Vult.
Christus Regnat
Christus Vincit
I (personally) have not been instructed to shoot and I think you don't know what you're talking about, we are being killed for words and less all over the world right now.
I serve the Most High, yes, it is Him who gives me instruction. Whom do you serve?
Then you are in for trouble. How can you be of any good use to anyone if God is not your master? Learn maybe from the failures repeated in history?
Two entirely different things bozo. Shouldn't you feds be worried about keeping your jobs
just got home from volunteering to help flood victims in my country. didn't find any of those weapon caches that you fake right-wingers lost in your 'tragic boating accidents'.
we all know the only time you fakes will take up guns is to kill white christian europeans. you know, the guys the usa was actually founded by and for.
For every one person saying it out of spite to troll online, dozens of faithful are being bold in the face of evil, which they actually hate more.
Two thoughts. First, if we believe it's true, can it be in vain? This whole thing is to make Christians afraid of speaking what aught to be a basic Truth to Christian communities. Hell, "king' is selling the incarnate godhead short. Why are these people trying to make the God of the Christians less than 'king"?
Two, say it for us if you will, but remember, we do believe it. At least those of us that actually believe our religion, that is.
Yes. If you say "Christ is King" while promoting manifestly unchristian behavior, you are implying that Christ endorses you and cheapening the name. This is the definition of taking God's name in vain.
I supported Candace Owens when she proclaimed Christ is King after the Daily Wire tried to persecute her for her faith. I like Jake Shields but he can't be saying Christ is King while unrepentantly living an unchristian lifestyle.
Not to beat a dead horse, but Nick Fuentes saying Christ is King while laughing at groyper rape memes is disgusting.
This is basically the reason the book of Isaiah was written. The Jews were patting themselves on the back for worshiping God, but they were told their proclamations were worse than useless considering their deeds.
Having said all that, the Daily Wire is the only reason we're talking about this at all because they can't bring themselves to admit they simply lost the moral high ground to Candace over Gaza.
"Christ is king". I'm not Christian, but I'm saying it in solidarity. It is not stated in vain, because it serves a purpose, it was not all in vain, because it begets results. Trolls mad. That's a valid result; speaking down to blasphemers and heretics.
Two thoughts. First, saying "Hell" here is highly ironic. Second, that's the standard title. "Glory to the newborn king". "The lord is my shepherd" (lord is a nobility pronoun). "Christ the lord". All very common parlances in standard Christian song and rhetoric.
I'm not an expert here. My assumption would be that the motivation/mens rea behind it would be the distinction. Saying it to affirm it or to inform someone seems like it would be just fine to me. Saying it to knock someone else or put them in their place ... I dunno. I can't speak for God, but I think he might give someone a side-eye for that.
Eh, I believe it as well in a different manner.
Religion, whether true or not, is what builds civilization.
There is no civilization that I would want to live in except the ones built by Christianity. Even if none of the supernatural stuff is 100% true ... by its fruits shall you know it.
If you want to be a pedantic asshole it's God the Father who is "King of Heaven," but Christ is consubstantial with Him.
Anyway. Christ is King.
I like the cut of your jib, sir
Vox Day was right about Jordan Peterson.
“Resist it while you still can... the barbarian never take the city until someone holds the gates open for them and it’s your own preachers and multicultural authorities who’ll do it for you...”
Christopher Hitchens, born 13th April 1949
https://x.com/durhamwasp/status/1778952979334242694
If he was alive today I have a strong inclination to think he'd follow Dawkins in calling himself "culturally Christian."
Makes you wonder what the have on him to flip him so drastically. Or he was acting a part to get a following and now he's taking the mask off.
look into his work with the un. if he weren't another psyop he would not be famous.
Juden Peterstein.