Lefty medical friend calls this the era of idiocracy
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (41)
sorted by:
... Did they forget how they treated Ivermectin? What happened there mirrors Idiocracy's Brawndo scene to nearly a T. (Let alone Hydroxychloroquine)
I think media literacy is a meme pushed by faggots, but come on now, that's one of the most famous scenes from the movie.
Ask your friend what he thinks of the Hippocratic Oath in the context of Trump supporters getting care, it'll probably be insightful for what you should expect if you're ever under his knife.
Part of the issue is that medical training in the decades prior to COVID really emphasized Evidenced Based Medicine as dogma and the be-&-end-all of all modern principles.
If there wasn't an adequately-powered Randomized, Double Blinded Control Trial proving any concept in medicine, it was treated as though no other truth could exist.
Tradition, experience and personalized medicine were treated as quaint and dangerous if it didn't conform to the latest industry-backed and population-based "expert" clinical guidelines being handed down from on high.
Clinicians were evaluated more on their compliance and adherence to these guidelines than on their actual outcomes or patients' wishes.
TL; DR - There’s a lot of cognitive dissonance experienced at the suggestion of killing the infallible "Evidenced Base Medicine" orthodoxy.
It frightens professionals that there is no absolute truth and everything becomes uncertain and untethered if there isn't a landmark study that you can fall back upon for every ailment out & reflexive action out there.
Honestly, I wouldn't even mind if Evidence Based Medicine was how things were done.
As it stands, we are operating on Scientism Faith Based Medicine. There was never a single randomized, double-blind control trial of the mRNA injections, let alone Remdesivir & ventilators. There's also no such studies explaining the benefits of sex re-assignment surgery, or puberty blockers.
Instead, medical administrators seem to be making holy edicts of what The Science is, and making treatment policies off of that alone.
Pretty sure the initial Pfizer trial was a double blinded RCT.
The problem was that the initial fall 2020 approval was based off of 10 weeks of data that only showed a 1% absolute risk reduction in actually catching COVID.
The initial trial showed a 90% decrease in catching COVID in the jabbed arm vs the placebo (take of that what you will if it was to be believed or not).
But the elephant in the room in the initial study used for approval beyond the hidden deaths in the jabbed arm, etc - 99% of the people they studied during the 10 weeks over summer/fall 2020 didn't catch COVID either way whether they got jabbed or not.
This was still in the middle of all the hysteria over restrictions and after the Summer of Floyd.
So even if the jab actually worked, which it didn't, 99% of the pop didn't actually need it anyway according to Pfizer's own study during the height of the pandemic.
Then they went ahead in Spring 2021 and jabbed the control arm anyway once Pfizer got emergency authorization to purposely destroy the ability to follow the pureblood cohort over time and compare it to the mudblood experimental one.
Emergency authorization was only available because the medical community strenuously rejected any existing treatment.
There were doctors threatened with being struck off for trying to publish treatment protocols.
Eventually, there were clinics that were giving effective treatment, but they had to do it in secret or else they would be destroyed by the state government's regulatory agencies. All to set the stage that the Pfizer clot shot could be rolled out.
In Australia they passed an act of parliament granting Pfizer unlimited immunity to repercussions of the clot shot so the Australian medical system could get access to some of the first exports of the treatment.
It is a conspiracy with a shocking, staggering reach.
The ''experts'' will warn you about the dangers of reading a study yourself instead of trusting them to do it for you, are the same ''experts'' who swallowed hook-line-and-sinker the bait fake study made by fake ''scientists'' supposedly proving hydroxychroloquine was killing people in clinical trials with impossible-to-verrify data.
It was made-up. They paraded it as definitive proof.
That's assuming you can get to the fucking research when it's normally behind a paywall.
Solution: https://www.sci-hub.ru
I have personally been handed a claim from a research study, which was behind a University paywall. The next biggest danger is looking at the actual study, and having to read the whole thing because the abstract doesn't match the conclusion and the conclusion doesn't match the data. IF the data was collected and tabulated correctly (if you don't see error bars or error propagation, throw it away), you might find that the conclusion just fucks off and says the opposite of the data.
Evidence Based Medicine is exactly how it should be, but like every single other thing that's a great idea, you have to be able to totally and permanently exclude leftists from having any kind of power or authority or they'll destroy it.
Evidence based medicine as it is presently used is a bit of a weasel word to the lay person.
It is treated as synonymous with "proven medicine", but a statically powered outcome study is not truly proof, only evidence. A statistically significant result is still completely wrong >0-5% of the time. Mechanistic root cause studies are proof, and they don't need statistical analysis because if they are correct they are correct without fail. The vast majority of evidence based medical practice is just very carefully educated guesses.
In an ideal world it would be "proven medicine", but that is an almost impossible ask presently, we haven't proven how many of our drugs even work, especially for off-label uses. And they can't be been proven safe because that would necessitate a complete understanding of human biology to say it doesn't interact with any of those systems negatively.
Addendum - The biggest problem with evidence based medicine in a society that lacks sufficient integrity is how much easier it is to manipulate statistical data sets to give the result you want to than it is to fake a mechanistic proof that isn't extremely easy to prove false.
Well said.
Another concern with worshipping RCT trials and "expert" clinical guidelines as dogma is that it leads to conformity and treating populations over individuals.
Every patient with disease X is expected to be put on drugs Y and Z because a study said that it will prevent one "terrible outcome 1" if the 87 plebs pop the pill compliantly for 10 years straight.
But it's the needle-in-a-haystack problem that the 1 of 87 who will benefit can't be identified, while the other 86 are exposed to risk, cost and lack of autonomy for no benefit to themselves.
Having studied Pharmacy at university; the first year had a course on the reading and understanding biological studies.
It was made real clear that most studies are pushing an agenda by starting from the conclusion and working backwards, cherry-picking "facts" to support their conclusion.
I was working in a hospital at the time of Covid, in a non medical role. Policy was set from the top down by management and specific training and procedures were rolled out.
It was made very, very clear that if you toed the line that all medical incidents and similar bullshit would be ignored by the hospital (who have a lot of practice doing this) but if you kicked up a fuss they would do their best to have you fired.
Management used the opportunity to get rid of anyone who wasn't a follower, anyone who objected, or spoke up, or complained.
Covid 19 was an application of realpolitik and empire-building. It was a failure of the community.
Or the unvaxxed.
Universal Healthcare can be denied to Trump supporters because people who voted Trump aren't within the Left's moral universe.
Not just that, cut from all assistance. Like Fema.
Thirteen hundred people employed to, what, take surveys and measure how fast colds spread? Insane.
This is why they send their kids to Ivy League schools.
Not so they can get a great job, but so that they never have to.
There's a screenshot from a real estate website shown in the newest Decoy Voice video that shows all the houses within 50 miles of DC listed for sale in the last month, and it's a staggering amount.
I'm sure these parasites will find refuge in state agencies or "consulting" in the private sector.
I'll tell you what. I'm going to order you to inject you with this experimental medicine that I pulled out of my ass. Don't worry, it only has a 1-in-13,000 chance of hospitalizing or killing you. If you don't take it, I'll have you fired, black listed, fined, kept from every public place, and then I'll take custody of your kids. Or you can take it, and then you'll probably live and you can keep your job. Until I ask you to do it again in 3 months, then you'll be fine, and I'll tell you you're fine. Until I ask you to do it again 3 months after that. And then again after that. And then again. And then again after that. If you miss even one of these injections, then the deals off and I'm coming for your kids.
After all...
It's the deal you gave us.
I'm sorry, the retard who lied about everything for 4 years, up to saying ''you are not a horse, stop'' in response to Ivermectin, one of the most useful and safe drugs ever discovered, can shut up forever.
He can make his bed, set it on fire, then settle in for a long winter’s nap.
That reads like Churchill.
I was smoking a cigar when I typed it.
Such people like to think they are defenders of knowledge against stupid barbarians who just want to destroy everything.
They haven't the foggiest idea what motivates their perceived enemies. They literally don't know any, because they have purged them all from their lives in the most vicious and uncaring ways possible.
Worst of all they don't even understand the "knowledge" they're guarding. They act like they're protecting some irreplaceable holy gospel, not a hint of understanding that a single to double digit percentage of those texts are fraudulent and objectively wrong, and the rest by definition should be replicable.
Closing down any single institution is a "nothing of value was lost" moment, copies will remain of their previous work and reality doesn't give a fuck who studies it, anyone good enough can get the answers
Disease detectives who were basing the covid panic they were selling to the public on the PCR test when it can’t even be used to diagnose a viral infection according to its inventor, Kary Mullis. Not to mention, there was no national or international standard set for how the PCR test was being conducted, so there were testing facilities all over the world intentionally conducting tests while using an absurdly high CT value, ensuring false positives pop up all over the place, almost like they were trying to manufacture the appearance of a pandemic, when there was no pandemic. Even Dr. Fauci can be found talking about cycle threshold values (CT values) before Covid saying that any PCR tests conducted with a CT value of 35 or more, the test won’t be “replication competent”, meaning what scientists are confusing for a viral infection is really just dead nucleotides….from what little I could find out about how the testing facilities in the U.S. were conducting their tests, I saw CT values anywhere from 38 into the 40’s. There were scientists out there in 2021 saying any PCR test conducted with a CT value of 35, you should consider 50% of the positive tests to be false positives. Listen to Kary Mullis and Fauci talking about the PCR test for yourself in the link below.
https://files.catbox.moe/b136xi.mov
My favorite part was when they discussed making the threshold for ''positive test'' more difficult to reach if the person got mRNA injections.
Because their own data were starting to show injected people were more likely to get CoViD.
Assuming there was a covid 19 virus here at all. I’m hesitant on that one for good reason, but if I look at the situation from an unbiased standpoint, all signs point to the virus being a gigantic psyop. Most people find the psyop idea too hard to believe, but is it really? We know for a fact the placebo effect can have real impacts on health, I’d assume it could even kill a person on occasion if their beliefs are strong enough, just as belief can probably cure cancer on occasion, or even give a paraplegic person new nerve growth and an ability to walk again if they truly believe prayers are helping or that they’ll beat paralysis after being told they’ll never walk again. ZOG’s worldwide conned the majority of people into thinking the virus was real by using millions of false positives to make the majority believe they’ve personally contracted the virus at some point. Sooner or later with millions of people testing positive, some are going to contract real flus and colds at the same time, some will be elderly and they will die from those sicknesses as they do every year in the thousands, bolstering the idea that the covid 19 virus is real. Not to mention, you didn’t even need to have symptoms for government to consider you a covid 19 death so long as you had a positive test within a few months of your death, they often deemed it a covid 19 death regardless of the real cause. There were people clearly dying of preexisting comorbidities, and the healthcare industry was labelling them as covid 19 deaths, there were car accident victims being labelled covid 19 deaths, the healthcare industry was out of control because there was a monetary incentive involved to say their patients died of covid 19. We had people dying from remdesivir and improper use of ventilators for sure, and they were all being labelled covid 19 deaths. With millions of positive tests out there, the likelihood that some people would develop actual symptoms (which included symptoms of every common sickness there was for covid 19), people were sure to believe they had the virus for real when it was just a common cold or flu, their symptoms would probably even feel potentially deadly just because they believe they’re infected with a super deadly virus. Some of those people’s mind’s literally created symptoms out of thin air when they weren’t sick with anything because that’s what the placebo effect will lead to on occasion. Bottom line, If gov can’t technically test for viral infection with a PCR test as Mulls said, and the average age of death for alleged U.S. covid victims at the time was 78 years old, which just so happened to be the average average lifespan of an American back in 2020, it sure looks like a psyop. Combine that with all early Covid patients in China dropping to the ground and convulsing on video before they died of covid, which never happened anywhere else, those vids had to have been faked, they were propaganda vids being deliberately put on reddit to maximize fear in the US just before the alleged virus got here….if they faked the Chinese vids intentionally, it’s safe to say the entire thing was faked, and every ZOG in existence was participating in the lie at a high level, while using false positives to create the illusion of a virus, and monetary incentive to boost the numbers of covid related deaths…..which is why Mullis had to die before the virus ever hit the U.S., he would’ve hurt their narrative big time since the entire idea that we were living through a pandemic was based on his test. What’s funny is that the places who were basically free of the virus were black nations who are way to dysfunctional to even coordinate a fake virus campaign like what we saw in the west.
Covid was quite obviously a hoax. You can even prove it by simply looking at the Italian data. It's important to look at Italy, because that's the one '1st World' nation where the virus was allowed to proliferate without masking etc for several weeks, so there are no confounding variables.
Still, you could use a few line breaks in your write-up!
There was an article from July 2021 put out by Johns Hopkins saying “ Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.” And this: "All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary, Briand concluded”. Pretty evident there wasn’t anything out of the ordinary going on based on the findings of Johns Hopkins researchers during the height of “the pandemic”.
You could look at the fact that the average age of death for Covid victims matched up to the average lifespan in every nation, because nothing out of the ordinary was going on health wise, aside from people not going to their routine checkups and not going to hospitals unless it was an emergency, which no doubt led to a tens of thousands of extra deaths globally, along with the remdesivir and improper use of the ventilators also killing thousands.
I used to order those from the USPS specifically so covidiots didn't have tests to get the numbers up. I have never tested positive for covid. Because I never treated for covid. I do have a stack of those tests in my bathroom.
Nooo, not my heckin disease detectives!!!
First of all, faggot, even in your own dumb self portrait, you're making girl duck face lips. Are you about to chow down on some cock after having a few hot takes on blewsky?
Second of all, it was only half of the employees, and you're spreading misinformation.
Third of all, they aren't the disease detectives, they TRAIN the "disease detectives." Which makes you a complete and total liar a this point.
Go fuck yourself, you fucking child.
https://www.cdc.gov/eis/php/about/index.html
The CDC allowed the.selves to become politcal. They need to be black listed from medicine.
i remember when they wanted to treat gunshot wounds as if it were under their jurisdiction to try to end run 2a.
When haven't Lefties called the current era Idiocracy or whatever it was prior to that movie existing?
Literally my entire life the Left has been calling it the worst time in history in terms of intelligence, climate, science, and all that nonsense.
It has ALWAYS been the worst time, for them. The worst time YET, at least, for it is a never-ending descent into worseness.
Instead of Phase 1, it really should be called Patient 0.
See ya, faggots