What have I been saying here, over and over again, about how the left all think of themselves as the most morally pure in the room, because They Care™, and have the purest intentions?
That chart is a visual representation of this.
This is why they never care about results, or solutions, or potential trade offs, they think just by caring, that this will solve things, and failure means you didn't care enough.
Just because treating any group as a monolith will leave gaps, I'll add my 2c.
My contention is if they all genuinely cared, it would at least be an even response across the board. But the heatmap shows a significant number of them care more about space rocks than their family. My interpretation of that group is they're the ones who are entirely self-serving and only care about the appearance of Caring™ as it's currently a requisite for entry into the elite's ranks and thus greater personal power.
How much they're willing to say they'd do is inversely proportional to how likely it is they actually have to do something about it personally:
Space rocks exist? "I'd die for them!"
Dad needs a ride to a checkup at the hospital? "Eh, he voted for Trump, I don't think he deserves healthcare anymore".
They're the ones holding up "illegals refugees welcome!" for the cameras at the border, but start hemming and hawwing when you hand them a form about housing one of them in their gated community.
That group in particular are a cancer that needs burning out.
In many cases I would argue they care way too much about results, to the point where they ignore the process to get to those results.
America is racist and refuses to hire blacks? Their solution is to force people to hire and admit black people, when a better solution would be to improve education for blacks in order to make them more hireable in the first place.
Global warming is killing the planet? Their solution is to force everyone to buy inferior products, when a better solution would be to properly engineer superior and cleaner products so that the force of law isn't even necessary.
America is difficult to immigrate to? Their solution is to simply embrace illegal immigration, when a better solution would be to modify the immigration system so that it is easier for skilled and desirable immigrants to get in, weeding out criminals and welfare pigs.
Whether or not these problems exist, or are worth solving is another conversation. The point is that they don't want to put in the work to find solutions to their stated problems, and instead try to bully people and force results.
Leftist fret of empathy is thoughtless and inconsiderate kvetching, a preachy performance advertised for the sake of stage, as stable and unswayed as a wacky inflatable tubeman.
Like Narcissus, white leftists are enamored with the shallow reflection of themselves, or better yet expressed as transfixed with the idea of themselves rather than loving themselves; which in there lies an important distinction. One grateful for their own life would never scorn their own kind with such zealotry. Instead, the golems resigned to moral perversion feigned as righteousness. To be a loxist leftist is to be a louse soused within aggrandized delusions, attempting to spare themselves by submerging others in their stead. Their collective narcissism is societal suicide.
And of course, this is why they eat each other. No one agrees on literally everything. The more their headcanons clash, the more they splinter off into smaller and smaller factions that no intersectional ideology can keep together.
I like to think of Star Trek, a show that showcases a functioning leftist Utopia. They will point to Star Trek and say "look how tolerant and accepting they are! We should be like them!" Yet the modern left would never tolerate a Ferengi running their bar, or a Klingon running their security, and they would encourage war with the Romulans and Cardassians because their empires are evil!
They wouldn't accept the Star Trek outcome because multiple episodes showed the doctors can easily do perfect cosmetic surgery, which would mean trans folks wouldn't exist.
What I hate about them is when they love animals more than humans. They make tons of animal protection laws, will foster and adopt homeless animals, will pay for random street rats vet bills and food.
Then they come home, go online and cry "Why doesn't anyone care about the homeless children, the starving adults, the poor people who can't afford dentist visits and new eyeglasses?"
Bitch, you are the ones spending half of your pay check to pay for every rat's tail surgery and gifting all your rooms for pet tarantellas.
I like animals, but I'd never put a random street rat's health, wellbeing and needs over my fellow humans'.
It's worse than that. They can literally ruin ecosystems because they have a romanticized view of nature. They prevented invasive species like goldfish, crayfish, gray squirrels, hogs and swans from being hunted, ending up in them displacing local species. They have broken into zoos, labs and even farms thinking they are freeing the animals while they are quickly eaten by local fauna or end up dying shortly since they can't adapt to another ecosystem or die from pollution.
Bleeding heart activist hurt animals
And it's always by doing something gay like protesting, because they'd never try to confront chinese poachers or denounce their "traditional medicine"
There is a goose species which was uncommon in my country 100 years ago (but still very common everywhere else). So the idiots made it protected. Now there are literally millions of them everywhere. They eat all the grains, ruin all the fields, shit every place, make shitton of noise. They refuse to make it unprotected again because "hurting animals is wrong!!!".
If a farmer so much as shoots a warning shot in the air, he is fined for "disturbing and trying to harm protected species".
Same with one venomous snake species. There's a snake species that is really common in everyplace throughout the whole country yet if it comes inside your house, bites you and threatens to bite your kids, you hit it with a shovel. You are now a criminal. There are no self-defense laws when it comes to animals.
I agree that many people are not worth it, but I meant generally. If you and some street rat both had ball cancers and risked losing your genitals, most leftists women would gladly choose the rat's genitals over yours, and that's not the kind of reality I like.
Shit would have been better if activist retards moved on to classical Telescopic Philanthropy by promoting crap like women's and gay rights in the third world while challenging authoritarian regimes from abroad.
Instead these cunts are delusional violent extremists so they promote fringe extremist causes locally that are detrimental to society and should have never been tolerated in the first place, hence we are now on the verge of civil war thanks to these intersectional fucks.
This picture is just something that's been passed around for the past couple years among the right, so it's nothing new here.
However, I think we should talk more about Leftist relationships...
I don't think people understand how many people on the political Left have Cluster B personality disorders like Borderline, Bipolar, and Narcissistic Personality Disorders. If you've ever dealt with a "psycho ex-wife/girlfriend" you know what this is.
The graph is merely an extension of the psychological conditioning that Leftists have trained their subjects with. They are taught to disown their friends and family for the sake of the abstract concept for a universal sense of justice. That is not in-built. That is coming from people with Cluster B personality disorders conditioning their victims.
Those Cluster B's are the ones teaching their victims to ignore their own plight for the sake of the latest justification of the abuser. Since these types of abusers don't see themselves as wrong, and think that the universe/society is the problem, then that's where they train their victims to focus while they benefit from the attention and status they are grooming among the victims in their orbit. These are predators who are hunting people, and that is why they can't actually empathize like a normal person. If you have ever in your life dealt with someone with BPD or NPD, you know this to be true.
I need you to understand that the fact that the media behaves like your crazy ex-girlfriend is not an accident. This is what happens when you give thousands of people like Amber Herd (and your ex) massive institutional power. The people of the west are being psychologically abused at an industrial scale by people with Cluster B personality disorders that think their relationships are not only normal, but perfect and that you're the crazy one.
This honestly needs a 6.5 inbetween 6 and 7. Everyone in my country means EVERYONE. I prefer my countrymen to people who just "live" here. You can break it down a lot more at other places, too but oh well.
Has anyone read the actual study cited in the graph? Because I glanced at it in response to something I read about it, and it's not entirely what the memes about it are.
I don't recall the details but it's in the ball park, but it doesn't literally say liberals care more about rocks then people.
If you go all out on this without reading the study be prepared to be wrong.
All the moral unit points in the world won't current the grammar of how his second paragraph starts out.
I'm not saying the rest of it is flawed. But many who have to read this type of thing regularly would have binned it already and so the effective eyes have dismissed what could be worthwhile data which hasn't been properly treated.
Yeah, I was wondering about why the conservative one had 0-12 and the liberal one had 0-20 under the pics. This is a bullshit post. Since the graphs and the list are from two different tasks/studies we have no actual knowledge what the categories in the graph were.
iirc, it's amount of responses for the heat chart for that spot. The amount of categories are the same. The two charts come from the same single study, it's even cited in the tweet.
What have I been saying here, over and over again, about how the left all think of themselves as the most morally pure in the room, because They Care™, and have the purest intentions?
That chart is a visual representation of this.
This is why they never care about results, or solutions, or potential trade offs, they think just by caring, that this will solve things, and failure means you didn't care enough.
Just because treating any group as a monolith will leave gaps, I'll add my 2c.
My contention is if they all genuinely cared, it would at least be an even response across the board. But the heatmap shows a significant number of them care more about space rocks than their family. My interpretation of that group is they're the ones who are entirely self-serving and only care about the appearance of Caring™ as it's currently a requisite for entry into the elite's ranks and thus greater personal power.
How much they're willing to say they'd do is inversely proportional to how likely it is they actually have to do something about it personally:
Space rocks exist? "I'd die for them!"
Dad needs a ride to a checkup at the hospital? "Eh, he voted for Trump, I don't think he deserves healthcare anymore".
They're the ones holding up "
illegalsrefugees welcome!" for the cameras at the border, but start hemming and hawwing when you hand them a form about housing one of them in their gated community.That group in particular are a cancer that needs burning out.
If you haven't read Uncle Ted's famous work you should. He explains liberalism similarly.
tl;dr, the amount a leftist cares about something is inversely proportional to the likelihood of them ever having to prove it.
Except I think also they care about "whatever the media tells them they should care about."
Meaning, tomorrow the heat map could shift if the official narrative changes.
Of course, Trump controls that now, so i expect that graph to dissipate as they cast around looking for something to virtue signal.
In many cases I would argue they care way too much about results, to the point where they ignore the process to get to those results.
America is racist and refuses to hire blacks? Their solution is to force people to hire and admit black people, when a better solution would be to improve education for blacks in order to make them more hireable in the first place.
Global warming is killing the planet? Their solution is to force everyone to buy inferior products, when a better solution would be to properly engineer superior and cleaner products so that the force of law isn't even necessary.
America is difficult to immigrate to? Their solution is to simply embrace illegal immigration, when a better solution would be to modify the immigration system so that it is easier for skilled and desirable immigrants to get in, weeding out criminals and welfare pigs.
Whether or not these problems exist, or are worth solving is another conversation. The point is that they don't want to put in the work to find solutions to their stated problems, and instead try to bully people and force results.
"By Any Means Necessary" isn't a slogan of the Right.
Leftist fret of empathy is thoughtless and inconsiderate kvetching, a preachy performance advertised for the sake of stage, as stable and unswayed as a wacky inflatable tubeman.
Like Narcissus, white leftists are enamored with the shallow reflection of themselves, or better yet expressed as transfixed with the idea of themselves rather than loving themselves; which in there lies an important distinction. One grateful for their own life would never scorn their own kind with such zealotry. Instead, the golems resigned to moral perversion feigned as righteousness. To be a loxist leftist is to be a louse soused within aggrandized delusions, attempting to spare themselves by submerging others in their stead. Their collective narcissism is societal suicide.
For all that the Left talks about being the party of empathy, they are shockingly bad at understanding that other people have unique perspectives and reasons to have those perspectives. The necessity of needing to like absolutely everything, regardless of either personal preferences or moral judgement, means that the only true virtue is "harmony" and the only true sin is "dissent."
And of course, this is why they eat each other. No one agrees on literally everything. The more their headcanons clash, the more they splinter off into smaller and smaller factions that no intersectional ideology can keep together.
I like to think of Star Trek, a show that showcases a functioning leftist Utopia. They will point to Star Trek and say "look how tolerant and accepting they are! We should be like them!" Yet the modern left would never tolerate a Ferengi running their bar, or a Klingon running their security, and they would encourage war with the Romulans and Cardassians because their empires are evil!
They wouldn't accept the Star Trek outcome because multiple episodes showed the doctors can easily do perfect cosmetic surgery, which would mean trans folks wouldn't exist.
What I hate about them is when they love animals more than humans. They make tons of animal protection laws, will foster and adopt homeless animals, will pay for random street rats vet bills and food.
Then they come home, go online and cry "Why doesn't anyone care about the homeless children, the starving adults, the poor people who can't afford dentist visits and new eyeglasses?"
Bitch, you are the ones spending half of your pay check to pay for every rat's tail surgery and gifting all your rooms for pet tarantellas.
I like animals, but I'd never put a random street rat's health, wellbeing and needs over my fellow humans'.
It's worse than that. They can literally ruin ecosystems because they have a romanticized view of nature. They prevented invasive species like goldfish, crayfish, gray squirrels, hogs and swans from being hunted, ending up in them displacing local species. They have broken into zoos, labs and even farms thinking they are freeing the animals while they are quickly eaten by local fauna or end up dying shortly since they can't adapt to another ecosystem or die from pollution.
Bleeding heart activist hurt animals
And it's always by doing something gay like protesting, because they'd never try to confront chinese poachers or denounce their "traditional medicine"
There is a goose species which was uncommon in my country 100 years ago (but still very common everywhere else). So the idiots made it protected. Now there are literally millions of them everywhere. They eat all the grains, ruin all the fields, shit every place, make shitton of noise. They refuse to make it unprotected again because "hurting animals is wrong!!!".
If a farmer so much as shoots a warning shot in the air, he is fined for "disturbing and trying to harm protected species".
Same with one venomous snake species. There's a snake species that is really common in everyplace throughout the whole country yet if it comes inside your house, bites you and threatens to bite your kids, you hit it with a shovel. You are now a criminal. There are no self-defense laws when it comes to animals.
I'd absolutely take in a stray cat over helping some retard lefty who caused their own problems.
My caring about humans is more selective.
I agree that many people are not worth it, but I meant generally. If you and some street rat both had ball cancers and risked losing your genitals, most leftists women would gladly choose the rat's genitals over yours, and that's not the kind of reality I like.
Shit would have been better if activist retards moved on to classical Telescopic Philanthropy by promoting crap like women's and gay rights in the third world while challenging authoritarian regimes from abroad.
Instead these cunts are delusional violent extremists so they promote fringe extremist causes locally that are detrimental to society and should have never been tolerated in the first place, hence we are now on the verge of civil war thanks to these intersectional fucks.
Why can't you be this guy more often? Not all the time, just... more often.
I was waiting for the loli shit to slip in there somewhere too. He totally left me hanging.
This picture is just something that's been passed around for the past couple years among the right, so it's nothing new here.
However, I think we should talk more about Leftist relationships...
I don't think people understand how many people on the political Left have Cluster B personality disorders like Borderline, Bipolar, and Narcissistic Personality Disorders. If you've ever dealt with a "psycho ex-wife/girlfriend" you know what this is.
The graph is merely an extension of the psychological conditioning that Leftists have trained their subjects with. They are taught to disown their friends and family for the sake of the abstract concept for a universal sense of justice. That is not in-built. That is coming from people with Cluster B personality disorders conditioning their victims.
Those Cluster B's are the ones teaching their victims to ignore their own plight for the sake of the latest justification of the abuser. Since these types of abusers don't see themselves as wrong, and think that the universe/society is the problem, then that's where they train their victims to focus while they benefit from the attention and status they are grooming among the victims in their orbit. These are predators who are hunting people, and that is why they can't actually empathize like a normal person. If you have ever in your life dealt with someone with BPD or NPD, you know this to be true.
I need you to understand that the fact that the media behaves like your crazy ex-girlfriend is not an accident. This is what happens when you give thousands of people like Amber Herd (and your ex) massive institutional power. The people of the west are being psychologically abused at an industrial scale by people with Cluster B personality disorders that think their relationships are not only normal, but perfect and that you're the crazy one.
DARVO meets government.
The horror. Sheer, unadulterated horror of it.
DARVO didn't exist prior to people with Cluster B disorders. They were doing it naturally until a victim wrote it down.
"Women want to be loved, they have no capacity for loving others." - Florence Nightingale
This honestly needs a 6.5 inbetween 6 and 7. Everyone in my country means EVERYONE. I prefer my countrymen to people who just "live" here. You can break it down a lot more at other places, too but oh well.
even with that "added context", anyone who implicitly rates space rocks to be on the same level of "caring" as their family still has some issues.
Has anyone read the actual study cited in the graph? Because I glanced at it in response to something I read about it, and it's not entirely what the memes about it are. I don't recall the details but it's in the ball park, but it doesn't literally say liberals care more about rocks then people.
If you go all out on this without reading the study be prepared to be wrong.
All the moral unit points in the world won't current the grammar of how his second paragraph starts out.
I'm not saying the rest of it is flawed. But many who have to read this type of thing regularly would have binned it already and so the effective eyes have dismissed what could be worthwhile data which hasn't been properly treated.
Snowflakes weren't going to read a wall of text from a guy named hoe_math anyhow.
Yeah, I was wondering about why the conservative one had 0-12 and the liberal one had 0-20 under the pics. This is a bullshit post. Since the graphs and the list are from two different tasks/studies we have no actual knowledge what the categories in the graph were.
iirc, it's amount of responses for the heat chart for that spot. The amount of categories are the same. The two charts come from the same single study, it's even cited in the tweet.