This is pure speculation. I have no evidence. But my gut is telling me we're going to see some kind of faked attack soon in order to instigate open war. The Syria shit, now these mystery drones, people in power looking smug, like they've already read the script. (Very similar to Biden talking about Nordstream before it blew up).
Possibly a false nuclear device, possibly a real one. They may even fail to find it before it detonates.
Regardless, it will be blamed on Iran. DO NOT BELIEVE THIS. It is a lie. Iran has no reason to attack us (and every reason to attack someone else). Sadly, I believe it will still work.
Cui bono? (we all know who).
It doesn't matter if anyone here believes it's Iran or not. The sociopaths will do whatever they feel like, as usual.
They do what they want, which is why I don't believe that 9/11 was staged to provide an excuse to invade Iraq. They didn't need an excuse.
They may need an excuse to galvanize people. Without 9/11, people like J.D. Vance wouldn't have signed up to wage their unjust war.
9/11 wasn't the excuse for invading Iraq. 9/11 was the excuse for invading Afghanistan.
If anything, 9/11 was the excuse to invade the US. It gave the feds the Patriot act, TSA, FISA, and now they have a workaround to the Constitution to do whatever they want and harass people. And people gave it the nod of approval because of 'terrorism'.
Woefully underrated comment here.
I'm given her all the upvotes I got, captain!
Brilliant comment.
Michael Chertoff and his dancing buddies
True, but 9/11 being fresh in people's minds made invading Iraq a lot easier to sell.
We had to fight the AXIS OF EVIL bro it was just like my heckin WW2 videogames.
Just like how every manufactured political controversy is a "Whatever-gate".
9/11 was the excuse for the Patriot Act. The wars were just a bonus.
You're probably right about a false flag, but it WON'T be biological or nuclear, possibly chemical.
The former two are WAY too unpredictable and risk tipping the scales too much that people just kill them as they've effectively sanctioned public assassinations on high value targets in the establishment with the healthcare CEO.
With the right in ascension, it makes false flags a LOT more tricky as there is a high chance it backfires and gives someone like Trump a mandate to REALLY purge the establishment in the name of security.
My hunch is it's all fake. They mocked up something with just enough radiological material to look plausible but not actually detonate. They'll rely on the media to sell it. A typical drumbeat of "experts" saying war now, no to time to wait. Probably before Trump takes office so he won't be able to stop it.
From what I've heard, the drones are U.S. military drones used to sniff for radioactive material. I've been speculating similar to you, that those drones are there to give plausible deniability to the government, that they were "trying to stop it" while also being behind it. I'm theorizing a possible dirty bomb false flag. Even if they don't have enough fissile material for a conventional nuke, a dirty bomb, in many ways, is worse.
With the shitstorm of international stuff going on, I don't doubt for a second the people in power want to stage another false flag (like 9/11) to get the U.S. involved in more wars for the benefit of a certain demographic (i.e. not White Westerners), which also explains why all military recruitment ads have switched to White men exclusively (zero DEI). It would also explain why the people in power let (helped) Trump get elected, to placate White men, and since "our guy" got in, it's now okay to support the military again, to push more globohomo across the planet.
But it WILL be something.
In a month they'll lose control over the FBI, intelligence, the military, medicine. They'll lose apparent control of Congress. The picks are already made so they'd have to take out Trump and Vance and that might even make it worse for them.
If there's not some kind of extreme event maybe the country is actually saved (or on reprieve) after all.
Plus nukes are too obvious as even though there are many of them, most are in the hands of a half dozen nations and readily accounted for.
But some random bio or chem weapon they can believeably lie about originating from "a far right nationalists cell", or Iran. Whichever fits the bill.
At this point I'm surprised they haven't tried to make that a narrative, an Iran Far Right Nazi team up. But now that I typed it the CIA fags are considering it.
Israel getting their ducks in a row before Trump makes everyone stop.
US military black projects that were onshored because they have nowhere to test them or have to by federal law for security reasons. They'll never admit what new killing toys they're playing with.
Possibly, but I'm still thinking that they'll try to keep milking Ukraine for the time being. Israel wouldn't make the full push to go after Iran without risking the whole middle east falling into chaos again. Assad may be gone but the Arabs should settle down now that they got their oil pipeline to Turkey to undercut the US (a self-own and completely intentional, Americans can't have energy independence), Russia and Iran.
"Consumer" "drones" that shut down bases in the US and the UK with impunity. That shut down airports in the US (and apparently China). But no one shoots them down. Because local first responders are warned to use hazmat equipment should one crash.
Geofencing? Bah. Not for these "drones".
But there's absolutely nothing to worry about, and they're not "foreign adversaries" ?!
When these clowns say "don't worry", start worrying.
Nuclear is way too risky, same with biological. Chemical weapons could be something interesting seeing how the US has “totally gotten rid of our chemical weapons guys!”, but I think a few middle eastern “Iranian” gunmen killing hundreds of people across the country on Christmas Day would be far more likely than anything else. Much safer.
Since we're posting revelations that came to us in a dream, I'll post mine: The drone situation is similar to the Metcalf Sniper Attack, where there was a discussion about a vulnerability amongst various parties, the threat was ultimately dismissed, and the aggrieved party decided to demonstrate how real the threat was.
I haven't dug too deeply but I've seen some drone videos where they have FAA anti-collision strobes. So effort is put in minimizing harm and rule violations. Just "oh you don't think my drone/anti-drone system deserves funding? watch this".
There was a guest from a CIA whistleblower type on Tucker a while back where she said it was an open secret that it was a north korean "special forces" team (obviously china backed) to test out an attack on infrastructure, apparently the bullet holes were at specific non random locations and the security pictures showed them as being asian.
Imo an EMP/infrastructure attack is the Russian/China response to strategic nuclear exchange. A handful of nukes air detonated above the US plus a few key sabotage targets are far more likely to succeed than a soviet style strategic nuclear barrage.
It's not antisemitic to call out Israel for their bullshit, which includes endangering jews.
The first culprit I will blame for any happening ever is our own American government, followed closely by Israel. I will not blame Russia, Iran, China, or random Muslims (probably MKULTRA'd with help from the FBI) no matter what America or Israel claims. The American government has zero credibility, even with Trump winning the election. Let the trannies and our recent arrivals fight their stupid wars.
Who in the world would believe that the US government allowed a hostile power to unleash dozens of drones over a period of weeks?
They are authorized shoot down airliners, civilian casualties be damned as much as the collateral damage in their wars, if they are hijacked, but we're supposed to believe that they would allow Iranian drones to just roam freely and for as long as they like?
None of this makes any sense.
The drones are ours, they're nuke detectors. They're going to say Iran smuggled a bomb into new York or something. They're not saying anything because it would obviously make people panic.
The real question is why would Iran put a bomb in NYC and not Tel Aviv.
That is the rumor spread by a guy who has contracts with the Pentagon, right?
Now I do wonder about this, and it's not original as I got it from the Matt Taibbi podcast.
Would someone with Pentagon contracts be casually revealing something that the Pentagon doesn't want to get out, without fear of losing these contracts?
I haven't heard a guy claiming that but... was his name Tony Seruga?
I think he’s referring to a tiktok or something video that went viral where a guy claimed that the drones are looking for a nuclear weapon that was lost/stolen from Ukraine.
His theory doesn’t make a lot of sense because it’s doubtful you would be able to use sensors to see them as nuclear weapons don’t really leak much radiation. They theoretically could be looking for some radioactive materials but unlikely it’s a nuclear warhead
I think the drones are white hats looking for a dirty bomb because they caught wind of an imminent false flag, one that is intended to push America into war with Iran.