Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

95
Chris Pratt is being criticized for not endorsing a candidate and urging unity for whomever wins (archive.ph)
posted 1 year ago by Mpetey123 1 year ago by Mpetey123 +95 / -0
26 comments share
26 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (26)
sorted by:
▲ 45 ▼
– dagthegnome 45 points 1 year ago +45 / -0

Pratt has to be one of the only human beings left in Hollywood.

They were going to go after him like this regardless of whether he did or did not endorse a candidate, given which candidate he likely would have endorsed.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– evilplushie 29 points 1 year ago +29 / -0

They went after him before this. Uniting with them will do nothing. We need to crush them

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ParadigmShift2070 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Pratt should've just stfu, this both sides need to chill thing appeals to no one

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Kalamander85 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Agreed. These asshats wanted me to die in concentration camps for my skin color, gender, sexual orientation and political views/affiliation. No fucking quarter.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– Kienan 18 points 1 year ago +18 / -0

These people are monumentally insufferable.

If Kamala had won, I do believe it would have been disastrous. But it would have been a survivable disaster. I'm really fucking glad it didn't happen, but I could have survived it if it did. These retarded losers can survive another Trump presidency.

Without endorsing either Harris or Donald Trump, Pratt told his fans he is “trying to make sense of the election through the eyes of Americans on both sides”, urging people to unite as “fellow countrymen” regardless of who wins.

For his statement, he mused about the impending result, stating: “It’s OK to take a moment to lick your wounds when you lose. Heck, go ahead and cry in the mirror.”

So, uhm. Sanity. Nuance. Throwing a bone to both sides. Urging unity.

However, many disagree, mainly due to the fact this election was considered one of the most pivotal in US history, with the actor’s statement being called too “banal”.

It's still an election. If you actually believed in a representational system, it wouldn't matter how pivotal it is; if one side fairly wins, they won. Them's the rules.

One particular critic wrote: “Pratt is trying to make it seem like this is any other election. Like Obama vs Romney, for instance. But it’s actually the most critical election of my lifetime. What we do in this moment, over the next 24 hours, matters very much.”

"This is pivotal! This isn't something standard like Bush v. Gore, this is Obama vs Romney! This is the most important election of our lifetime!" Gimme a break.

Another added: “Seriously, Chris Pratt has a ‘both sides’ view on this election,” with one more – a fan account dedicated to Guardians of the Galaxy – stating on X/Twitter: “While he does not endorse either candidate, and the site is from a former Democrat (now independent) Maria Shriver, it upsets me to see Chris Pratt play “both sides have good ideas” with what is at stake for me.”

It's not a both sides argument at all; it's a one side arguments; AMERICA. Sit down, shut up. You lost. Now let Trump make America great again for all of us, lib.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– Smith1980 29 points 1 year ago +29 / -0

They called Romney and evil racist so they can spare me that talk now

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 31 ▼
– Kienan 31 points 1 year ago +31 / -0

Yeah, that's my point. Every single time, the Current Guy is totally Literally Hitler...and then they love him later, when the compare him to New Literally Hitler.

Heck, the left loves the Cheneys now, and the only reason they don't fully love W is because he wouldn't endorse the Dems fully. As you said...they can spare me with all that nonsense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Smith1980 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

Like once Trump is gone watch the Never Trumpers realize the left hates them. Best example is McCain. The media loved him when he would criticize Bush, but when he ran against Obama he was an evil racist

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– Kienan 16 points 1 year ago +16 / -0

I just can't wait for the "Wow, this X dude is really like Hitler! Remember the good old days when Republicans ran a sane, reasonable candidate like Donald Trump. Good dude!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Smith1980 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

I have no doubt that will happen. I never thought I’d see the media be nice to Bush but here we are

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ernsithe 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

2028 isn't that far away.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– FromTheShadows 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

And then when he went against Trump, they loved him again. Especially when he voted against the repeal of Obamacare at the last fucking minute while he was in his death throes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Wizardslayer 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

I once called out a lib about that when she was freaking out that Trump was a literal nazi and Hitler but no one listened. I was like "well you called Bush a nazi, McCain a nazi, and Romney a nazi. The word has lost all meaning." Got the response "well they were nazis too... but trump is the real nazi!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ParadigmShift2070 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

should've replied I wish

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Mpetey123 [S] 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

It is funny how they try to make an us vs them argument and find out how little any of us like them. They are insufferable nepo baby brats

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– chaosbydesign 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

One particular critic wrote: “Pratt is trying to make it seem like this is any other election. Like Obama vs Romney, for instance. But it’s actually the most critical election of my lifetime. What we do in this moment, over the next 24 hours, matters very much.”

Did they forget about 2016? It's the same doom and gloom as then.

As a non American, it gets very tiring.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 15 points 1 year ago +15 / -0

Fuck unity. I want heads on pikes. The establishment cannot go unpunished

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– I_Bent_My_Wookiee 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Tyrion said it best: "Heads, pikes, walls"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Norenia 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Forget the next coming of Christ, I want the next coming of Vlad.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Adamrises 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

I'm still struggling to get why they have such a hardon for Pratt in particular.

Like, he isn't the only right wing guy in Hollywood, nor the only actual church goer. Heck he is a low power, milquetoast guy without any of the pull many of the much more right wing guys have in that sphere. Every reason I can come up with I can think of a few guys who don't receive a fraction of the hate he does while being the same.

It really seems to be a mix of him daring to be in their Capeshit (and tainting it) and him never taking the bait and responding to their constant attacks. Neither in defense of or cowing.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– StaticNoise2 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

I think it's what u/Mpetey123 said and also that he is non-de-script enough that he can stand in for everything they project onto white, straight, male Christians.

He's fairly relevant, he looks like a protestant sort of normal guy and they hate normalcy and all it represents, so in a way, it's his very milquetoast-ness that acts like a beacon for them to project everything they hate about Christianity on to.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– akira2501 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

I'm still struggling to get why they have such a hardon for Pratt in particular.

They tried to get him to fuck kids and he said no?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Mpetey123 [S] 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

I don't understand the hate either. I guess he is just too close to the icky plebeian class. I know he's made pro Christian statements before, and that bugs a ton of people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Constipatriot 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

He wore a Don't Tread on Me shirt a few years ago and they were howling about how he's a closet conservative and must be canceled. If he is and he wants to keep his status, staying silent and neutral is the smart thing to do. If he's not conservative and is remaining silent on politics because it's not his station, good on him.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– BetterNameUnfound 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

You know that for years they've wanted to do to him what they did to Vic Mignogna.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– alucard13mmfmj 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Probably never attended a pdiddy or epstein party.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy