A classic from the DNC archcuck Ezra Klein:
The Yes Means Yes law could also be called the You Better Be Pretty Damn Sure law. You Better Be Pretty Damn Sure she said yes. You Better Be Pretty Damn Sure she meant to say yes, and wasn't consenting because she was scared, or high, or too tired of fighting. If you're one half of a loving, committed relationship, then you probably can Be Pretty Damn Sure. If you're not, then you better fucking ask…
The Yes Means Yes law is trying to change a culture of sexual entitlement. That culture of sexual entitlement is built on fear; fear that the word “no” will lead to violence, or that the complaint you bring to the authorities will be be (sic) ignored, or that the hearing will become a venue for your humiliation, as the man who assaulted you details all the ways you were asking for it. “No Means No” has created a world where women are afraid. To work, “Yes Means Yes” needs to create a world where men are afraid.
For that reason, the law is only worth the paper it’s written on if some of the critics' fears come true. Critics worry that colleges will fill with cases in which campus boards convict young men (and, occasionally, young women) of sexual assault for genuinely ambiguous situations. Sadly, that's necessary for the law’s success. It's those cases — particularly the ones that feel genuinely unclear and maybe even unfair, the ones that become lore in frats and cautionary tales that fathers e-mail to their sons — that will convince men that they better Be Pretty Damn Sure.
It could hardly be more obvious that that repellent little worm is seething at Chad and exuberantly fantasizing about destroying Chad's life while posturing as the Nice Guy- erm I mean Male Ally, when really he just wants to punish Chad for having sex that he can't. Heck, maybe "Chud" is a Freudian slip, it is rather close to "Chad" after all.
This is from an old essay of his from the height of metoo, and lefties try to gaslight everyone about metoo not having been as batshit insane as it actually was, when they really only reeled it back a bit for rapefugees, trannies, and Joe Biden. Because of course it was never really about protecting women.
But it's important to not allow the memory of metoo to fade, because the gender war is being dialed back up again, spiteful troons and landwhales are still brainwashing kids with the metoo ideology, and it's important to emphasize that it isn't just randos on tumblr or twitter or tiktok espousing these insane beliefs. A high-level DNC propagandist openly and explicitly advocated for a totalitarian policy with the intent of destroying the lives of innocent men, and they're gearing up to try it again with zoomers, even as they allow vibrancy and troons to rape little girls.
Nothing made this more obvious than that one fat idiot who drew himself as a blue bear in his comics (dont remember his name), who drew a comic where he beat the shit out of some guy for taking pictures of some cosplay girl at a convention, only for people to find out that A) The comic actually happened in real life B)The guy was taking a picture of his girlfriend, who wanted to be photographed and C) The bear dude was in the background seething, completely alone. The comic was total fantasy, fueled by incel rage.
Andrew Dobson, aka Tom Preston, aka Catty N. The guy frequently attacked sexy characters in anime and video games, the people who made them, and the people who bought them. All the while being a complete degenerate himself who drew inflation porn featuring women often getting inflated against their will popped like balloons (functionally depicting rape and snuff porn). And as the last of his stupid aliases shows, pretended to be a teenage lesbian.
Last I heard, Dobson was permanently banned from the Internet by his parents because his nuclear-powered Aspergers costed his brother a government job. Keep in mind this is a grown-ass man getting grounded by his parents.
Yep. I wouldn't be surprised if he trooned out a while ago in the hope of fucking a lesbian like he always hoped he could. And killed himself not long afterward.
I honestly think Dobson is just waiting for his parents to die so that he can inherit the house and resume his online presence with his relatives being completely unable to retaliate aside from disowning him.
He parents likely threatened him with eviction so he had to leave the internet to avoid homelessness.
Even his "neutral" Wikitubia page makes him sound like a lolcow. And then there's this video takedown that's... hilarious.
Do they make these male feminists in a factory or something? It's like that have 2 models. That's the bald goony fat soy retard model.
How dare you not give Dobson the respect he deserves.
He larped as a teenage lesbian for years for our amusement.
Don't give Dobson any more hot air. His ego is already inflated enough.
he's probably the strongest lolcow in history
With Chris-chan and the Literally Whos in the running, that's a bold statement. Top 10, definitely.
Considering he literally just disappeared one day silently without giving us an epic final conclusion, I'll disagree there.
Now that takes me back.
https://imgchest.com/p/xny8egppybl
This screenshot... chef's kiss.
Please tell me you have this comic.
Dobson's comic, you can read here. The ComicCon picture of the cosplayer is here; allegedly, the guy in the tan shirt is Dobson, but from just this picture it's hard to tell. The original Twitter post this all came from is from a suspended account, but it was archived here.
If you have ever read or studied female feminist media and literature, it has a trope based on reality where they don't want to get rid of all men but rather they want a society with just two groups of individuals - women and "Chad". The male "ally" is too blind to see this and assumes his sycophancy will save him under this ideology. It's also why as Government cabinets become majority women and male feminist (such as the UK one is now), you're starting to see the beginning of the introduction of new misogyny reviews and laws which will criminalise incels, unwanted attention, communication and behaviour (such as a woman having to swipe left or reject a man's advances) as well as unrequited love that only Chads would not fall foul of at any point.
Do you think the UK will have enough time to implement it before the collapse? There is a balance with Islamist and the Globalist that they need to keep.
Don't know of any dystopian literature that handles that situation, seems even they did not predict such insanity to function, haha
They, and us, are likely to be in a hot civil war by the end of the decade.
The UK is going to be done completely within 4 years, maybe half that, I don't think my country has long, by the way, fun fact, feminists in the UK have frequently been floating the idea of curfews for men. I think it's entirely possible they may start targeting men in earnest now given they've gotten away with so much already. It's not just going to be simply writing new laws but they'll do plenty of that, the TERFs are salivating at the idea of going after men and making their lives miserable.
It's pretty retarded seeing people like Nigel Farage talking like we've got that long expecting to be able to re-take parliament and I've got to laugh at it, we're going to get run into the ground.
But would the muslims comply with such a curfew?
lol I mean that's the thing isn't it? It will be when they clamp down on the most retarded shit possible it will fall apart, at least I hope. However normies are a stubborn bunch and have shown they are almost in line with the leftists in terms of how much they'll virtue signal.
It won't be too long before the legislation comes to Parliament. The review into misogynistic violence is due soon.
The joke is on the feminists then. As soon as the male allies are all gone, all of the women would start fighting over the top 10% of chads while ignoring the rest. Their female nature ensures that they will never be satisfied.
Klein's article is from before the MeToo explosion, actually. It's from 2014. https://archive.ph/C3bdM
The Rape Culture hysteria is a bit different than MeToo. It was targeting average guys, especially in college. MeToo started bagging powerful leftist men like Harvey Weinstein and Matt Lauer. Then, when Tara Reade accused Biden, it got shut down. Biden put the campus kangaroo courts back so they are still going on.
Good point.
I think it was shut down the moment they realized it wasn’t going to bring down Trump.
Incel is a dirty word. It's mainly used by women to Kafkatrap men who disagree with them. It's fitting, since sex is all they value and know how to value
Nothing less than “guilty until proven innocent”, which is a total inversion of our (admittedly flawed) existing legal system into a complete dystopian hellscape. But it’s okay because “protect women”.
Male feminism was, is and always will be camouflage for rapists to get easy marks. Man-haters (feminists) could squash them and end it overnight, but that would mean admitting the "enemy" was correct, so they'll take the hits and grin and bear it.
Comparing incels to male feminists is pretty unfair I feel, they are not the same and never will be and I feel like we need to properly define incel because it's a term that gets abused far too much even in these circles. Actual incels are extremely mentally depressed people who consider themselves too ugly to get laid and have zero confidence in themselves to the point of being thoroughly black pilled.
Fucked up people within these groups for sure, but male feminists are definitely not the same. They've still got the determination to manipulate their way through leftist circles in order to either rape or get laid.
Being an incel isn't a linear path. You either wind up like those we generally think of when using the term, or you can branch off and be a
makemale feminist, or troon out.It's not necessarily that they consider themselves unattractive, it's that everyone else considers them unattractive. The halo effect and ugly tax are real things and your looks (predominantly genetic so you can't change them at the gym) do influence how people treat you and whether you are welcomed into social groups. If you're unattractive, you need to be exceptionally talented in a social activity to overcome thar. Neuroatypicality also have an effect. We know that a disproportionate number of incels have things such as autism.
I don't think it's even that, when you look into them you realise a lot of them have had bad experiences or simply don't understand why they haven't been able to even by noticed by a girl. There are countless guys like that, the difference is the rest of us either get over whatever school etc. trauma we might have had or we take advantage of autism and improve ourselves to a ridiculous degree no one would recognise us.
I bring this up because I remember ages ago seeing an article pop up about an journalist who interviewed an incel in person and to her credit it was a fair one. She was shocked at how normal he was and he had to explain to her that even talking to a woman like her was a rare occurrence for him.
It's like the old stereotype of how leftists especially like to harp on about virgin neckbeard's living in the mum's basement ( Despite them being the biggest soy manlets around ) and I've got this feeling that if the WEF got what they wanted and did a mass doxxing of anyone anonymous they would probably be shocked at how many guys calling them faggots online are actually their co-workers or at a minimum high functioning autists or guys with money.
The reason I'm fairly confident stating this is, no one who fits the stereotype would be capable of having the high level conversations I've seen about glowies and financials on a daily basis and this tends to be a trend that stretches across groups. Meanwhile the average normie on the street is a massive retard that barely knows how bank accounts work.
This is why I'm very stubborn when it comes to incels and at least defining them properly. Don't get me wrong, you do have the odd ones out that often fit the gremlin stereotype of a fat virgin that never goes outside but I'm not convinced about the majority.
the fact that they suddenly went silent when it came to rapefugees and Joe Biden's sexual assault victims shows you that they never cared about sexual assault... they were looking for any excuse to create hysterical, anti-fact attacks on political opponents.
first it was accusing opponents of sexual assault decades after so there could never be any opportunity for evidence. blasey ford repeatedly debunked her own shit, outed herself as a total fraud. for example, she hysterically claimed she had such bad PTSD that she added an extra door to her home. but then investigation showed she was running an illegal airbnb, local occupancy ordinances required the extra door. she then got her house rezoned based on the second door, so the airbnb was no longer illegal.
then came the original sin of racism/sexism of BLM. no matter what, they will accuse you of being racist.
no matter what, they're going to rationalize you as being racist, and then demand subservience for your transgressions.
it was always about power and bullying disguising itself as compassion.
Well, what do you expect? 'Klein' means 'Small' in german. Sorry... in yiddish. ;)
The best thing about whores is at worst they can only accuse you of theft.
Pretty sure male feminism is just a mating strategy. "Maybe if I do what women want, they'll fuck me." That's it. That's all male feminism is. And yeah, when the strategy doesn't work they get mad and jealous at the people having the sex they wish they could be having.
There's a reason why Gad Saad called it the "sneaky fucker" strategy.
Well, you're a middle eastern warlord and you marry a nine year old girl for example.