I know I’m beating a dead horse buuuuttt…. Didn’t they say they just wanted to be left alone and what consensual adults do behind closed doors is none of my business? Didn’t they mock the idea of a slippery slope? Didn’t I get told that seeing a gay character on tv won’t hurt me when I raised concerns about over representation
It wasn't true. What they want is a society without morals in which everyone can engage in every conceivable vice without shame. As long as anyone believes in right and wrong, they will see themselves as persecuted.
In one of Adam Carolla's books he has a bit about speed limits. How they test everything at 150 mph to safety but the limit is 65 max outside of desert roads.
The car might be mechanically secure to that speed, but I doubt most drivers are capable of managing, say, lane changes or merging or anything beyond an extremely slight turn at that speed.
I do think there are some places where it could go up to 80 though. Most highways and turnpikes, that would probably be fine.
There was a road in Montana that didn't have one for a little while. It was glorious and I saw the reason why they made the speed limit 80 MPH every time I road it.
Before clicking the link, I thought the reason they'd give that the signs were homophobic would be some dog whistle bullshit. It's actually much dumber; they think the signs were put up to prevent gays from meeting up. That's it.
The signs that read “No Cruising” and prohibited U-turns were installed in 1997 when neighbors complained about gay men hanging out and looking for dates in certain residential areas close to popular gay bars.
They actually were put up to prevent "gays from meeting up," which is a euphemism for turning residential neighborhoods into red light districts.
I know I’m beating a dead horse buuuuttt…. Didn’t they say they just wanted to be left alone and what consensual adults do behind closed doors is none of my business? Didn’t they mock the idea of a slippery slope? Didn’t I get told that seeing a gay character on tv won’t hurt me when I raised concerns about over representation
Maebe they did and Maebe they didn't
It wasn't true. What they want is a society without morals in which everyone can engage in every conceivable vice without shame. As long as anyone believes in right and wrong, they will see themselves as persecuted.
We REALLY need to bring back insane asylums.
There wouldn't be enough space to fit them all.
San Francisco and LA are pretty big.
Not big enough apparently, they keep moving to the Northwest and destroying it.
That's what exile and the gallows are for.
The left would just fill them with dissidents and let their degenerate supporters stay free.
I didnt want to hear that kid touching activist fag's voice.
He's totally not touching kids. It's just sheer coincidence that he's posing in front of a "baby gay" banner.
Maebe A. Girl, did it choose that name or does the graphic guy want to be fired? How does preventing U-turns stop faggots from faggoting together?
You know, I find speed limits to be terribly racist. We should take those down, too. All types of car races should be welcome anywhere.
In one of Adam Carolla's books he has a bit about speed limits. How they test everything at 150 mph to safety but the limit is 65 max outside of desert roads.
Because they set the limits when 65mph was the limit of a car being safe, and then never updated them after the fact.
The car might be mechanically secure to that speed, but I doubt most drivers are capable of managing, say, lane changes or merging or anything beyond an extremely slight turn at that speed.
I do think there are some places where it could go up to 80 though. Most highways and turnpikes, that would probably be fine.
There was a road in Montana that didn't have one for a little while. It was glorious and I saw the reason why they made the speed limit 80 MPH every time I road it.
Before clicking the link, I thought the reason they'd give that the signs were homophobic would be some dog whistle bullshit. It's actually much dumber; they think the signs were put up to prevent gays from meeting up. That's it.
They actually were put up to prevent "gays from meeting up," which is a euphemism for turning residential neighborhoods into red light districts.
In that article the guy even admits that the faggots were loud and obnoxious and making life there difficult
That's also the real reason the police was ''persecuting'' people at Stonewall : public degeneracy being a nuisance.
Ah, of course. That's what I get for taking their words at face value.
Why do I feel like this will be the exact same result as when China flipped the meaning of traffic lights 🤔
I don't care if they're homophobic, traffic markings are more important than your butt sex fetish.
Visually-distracting rainbow-painted roads have entered the chat.
Wait until they get rid of W2-3R signs because of me soggy knees.
Sadly this is not peak wokeness.
BTW traffic signs are there for safety. I'm sure this will not result in anything bad.
Wait, this abomination to the human race is named "Maebe A. Girl"
I have no words.
Elected official Maebe A. Girl
''When you learn the history of it...''
Such levels of terminal academic fart huffing retardation are rarely achieved outside of satire.
based gays using their oppression stack status to subvert CA's most annoying law.
Oh, OK. Make the streets safe for gay cruising again.
Is there any social convention fags won't shit on because they're so fucking worshiped and adored by the left?
"If anyone, anywhere opposes the Gay State, we're gonna track 'em down, find 'em, and put 'em up against the wall!"
Buttfuckers Uber Alles!