Nothing will change, because Mexico isn't a real country with a real head of state. It's a satrapy for the various criminal interests who actually run the place.
Is this stupid? You betcha. Does it really matter? No. Because their elections are faker than ours.
Mexicans: "We're plagued by violent criminal cartels, who kidnapped group of student protesters and burned them in an open ditch, murdered an entire town's police force, and abducted and REDACTED a female mayor."
Also Mexicans: "It's time to put a Jewish woman in charge."
(but I agree with the other guy it's faker than gay)
It is super odd that for being minorities.. they make up like 50% of a western country's cabinet.. or in this case, president of a catholic majority country. Hmmm.
Are we going to pretend that the barely extant catholicism of mexico actually holds value?
Catholicism, while not as openly destructive as islam, is ideologically opposed to the core structures of the US.
Catholicism is leftist, globalist subversion of christianity into a weapon for men to use to manipulate nations. The US was built upon the moral framework of protestantism.
Before it was NGOs and the cartels trafficking hordes of third worlders with the government turning a blind eye. Now with her in charge the government will actively aid in the invasion.
Also, apparently a Jew who has converted to Christianity is a Jew, and a Christian who converts to Judaism is also a Jew, according to the weirdos at least. What's that all about?
As a JIDF shill that you are, you are very aware that nobody can CONVERT to Judaism. Why do you think there's no such thing as Jewish missionaries? Because they believe that only TRUE Jews (people descended from the original Jews) can be Jews and every single other human being is now and forever a Goy.
you are very aware that nobody can CONVERT to Judaism. Why do you think there's no such thing as Jewish missionaries?
Cause they lived in Christian and Muslim lands for 2000 years where if they tried to convert people, they would be in very, very serious trouble. This necessity has now been adopted into their religion.
Although still, conversions are possible and even recognized by the Israeli state. I assume that if they didn't demand that you slit your dick for them, more people would convert in order to invade Israel.
Because they believe that only TRUE Jews (people descended from the original Jews) can be Jews
Staying true to the religion of your forefathers. Who else would want to be a Jew, rather than adopting the vastly improved version that is available?
Before Jerusalem was sacked the Jews disliked goyim converting to Judaism, even to what they considered a heretical sect. A couple decades after Christ, the reason the Jews hated Paul but tolerated the Christians in Jerusalem is because Paul dared bring the message to goyim, whereas the church in Jerusalem was basically all Jewish Christians.
Nice partial-sentence quote, the "couple decades after Christ" part is pretty important to the thought. Stephen was shortly after the crucifixion of Christ, but things settled down in Jerusalem, at least until Paul came around when he got arrested.
Uh, OK. So you mean a very short sliver of time in history then? Then I'm not exactly sure what point you're trying to make. This 10-20 years (not exactly sure) weighs more than the rest of history?
If Jews don't want other people to become Jews, that's good, not bad. It means they don't bother other people for that reason.
Cause they lived in Christian and Muslim lands for 2000 years where if they tried to convert people, they would be in very, very serious trouble. This necessity has now been adopted into their religion.
AntonioOfBBCJournalist, it's askschually the whitey and christian fault. It's both sad and hilarious that after being inactive for so long, I open this forum to see what's up and I see AntonioTheMerchant still being a jshill, do you not have a hobby or something productive to do?
It’s very simple, Antonio. No one honestly believes that practicing Jew Ivanka Trump is actually Jewish. Similarly, no one believes that avowed atheist Woody Allen isn’t Jewish.
Sure, that's a reasonable standard. But the problem is that earlier in the thread, there were people who called that Milei fellow in Argentina, who apparently converted to Judaism or something, a Jew. While I know of these people that they would also label everyone who is a Jew who converts to Christianity a Jew, except apparently the apostles.
I mean initially. I doubt I can find the very first thread where I heard of Milei, but people here were like late 1990s schoolgirls meeting DiCaprio in real life.
I can't find the thread, but as far as I remember, I was the only one saying that.
Not because of anything Jew-related, but because I thought he was just a bit weird. I'm not used to presidential candidates calling people "shit leftists".
For some reason your username never hit me, even though I've read The Merchant of Venice. The only motivation I can think of is for picking it is to troll, which if indeed true is well done.
You make solid arguements, but there are no shades of gray for the conpro types. I would argue, however, that those of us who cheered for Afuerta and those downvoting you are mostly two separate groups of people on here.
Nothing will change, because Mexico isn't a real country with a real head of state. It's a satrapy for the various criminal interests who actually run the place.
Is this stupid? You betcha. Does it really matter? No. Because their elections are faker than ours.
Mexico is the future of America. A bunch of jews at the head of a muttlatto mix of low to mid iq rabble that constantly begs for gibs.
Hardly. The future of Mexico is finding themselves facing the world's largest minefield.
Jews probably run the Cartels too so it probably does matter
First time I've heard of it.
If only you knew...
Apparently Escobar is Spanish for Goldstein.
Oh things will change. Mexico, a Christian country, will suddenly have a mysterious influx of Muslim and other non-Christian settlers.
Mexico has been basically a Leftist state since they killed Maximillian.
Who, frankly, was the only competent ruler of Mexico in it's history.
Sheinbaum's posture looks like she went to the Montgomery Burns Finishing School for Girls.
Excellent.
Booourns! Boooooourns!
Government has no real presence outside of Mexico City
Mexicans: "We're plagued by violent criminal cartels, who kidnapped group of student protesters and burned them in an open ditch, murdered an entire town's police force, and abducted and
REDACTEDa female mayor."Also Mexicans: "It's time to put a Jewish woman in charge."
(but I agree with the other guy it's faker than gay)
She’ll just expedite the invasion of the country
just a cohencidence.
It is super odd that for being minorities.. they make up like 50% of a western country's cabinet.. or in this case, president of a catholic majority country. Hmmm.
C’mon, they only make up like 20% of Biden’s cabinet. Just ignore the fact that that 20% is basically every important position.
Oh boy? More like Oy vey!
What could she possibly do to Mexico or US? The borders to US are already opened and no one is asking for the presidents permission.
Will she demand that the cartels become more inclusive to women?
Same thing that's being done everywhere else: import millions of Africans, Arabs and other non-Christians to replace the Christian population.
Are we going to pretend that the barely extant catholicism of mexico actually holds value?
Catholicism, while not as openly destructive as islam, is ideologically opposed to the core structures of the US.
Catholicism is leftist, globalist subversion of christianity into a weapon for men to use to manipulate nations. The US was built upon the moral framework of protestantism.
That may not work in Mexico, it has a reputation of being a dangerous country and lacks opportunities.
Before it was NGOs and the cartels trafficking hordes of third worlders with the government turning a blind eye. Now with her in charge the government will actively aid in the invasion.
(((Sheinbaum)))
It’s becoming impossible to ignore.
But noticing is anti-Semitic.
Yes.jpg
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment asserts an ongoing, inter-temporal, jewish race war.
lol, you retards were cheering Milei. AFUERTA!
Also, apparently a Jew who has converted to Christianity is a Jew, and a Christian who converts to Judaism is also a Jew, according to the weirdos at least. What's that all about?
As a JIDF shill that you are, you are very aware that nobody can CONVERT to Judaism. Why do you think there's no such thing as Jewish missionaries? Because they believe that only TRUE Jews (people descended from the original Jews) can be Jews and every single other human being is now and forever a Goy.
I am?
Cause they lived in Christian and Muslim lands for 2000 years where if they tried to convert people, they would be in very, very serious trouble. This necessity has now been adopted into their religion.
Although still, conversions are possible and even recognized by the Israeli state. I assume that if they didn't demand that you slit your dick for them, more people would convert in order to invade Israel.
Staying true to the religion of your forefathers. Who else would want to be a Jew, rather than adopting the vastly improved version that is available?
Before Jerusalem was sacked the Jews disliked goyim converting to Judaism, even to what they considered a heretical sect. A couple decades after Christ, the reason the Jews hated Paul but tolerated the Christians in Jerusalem is because Paul dared bring the message to goyim, whereas the church in Jerusalem was basically all Jewish Christians.
[Saint Stephen has entered the conversation]
Nice partial-sentence quote, the "couple decades after Christ" part is pretty important to the thought. Stephen was shortly after the crucifixion of Christ, but things settled down in Jerusalem, at least until Paul came around when he got arrested.
Uh, OK. So you mean a very short sliver of time in history then? Then I'm not exactly sure what point you're trying to make. This 10-20 years (not exactly sure) weighs more than the rest of history?
If Jews don't want other people to become Jews, that's good, not bad. It means they don't bother other people for that reason.
AntonioOfBBCJournalist, it's askschually the whitey and christian fault. It's both sad and hilarious that after being inactive for so long, I open this forum to see what's up and I see AntonioTheMerchant still being a jshill, do you not have a hobby or something productive to do?
???
It's nobody's "fault". I don't regard it as a bad thing.
Says the guy who claims that I'm Russian...
When did I claim that you're Russian? I just said you're a slav.
lol you're such a JIDF clown.
Why though?
It’s very simple, Antonio. No one honestly believes that practicing Jew Ivanka Trump is actually Jewish. Similarly, no one believes that avowed atheist Woody Allen isn’t Jewish.
It’s an ethnicity.
But Ivanka's children will be Jewish. Conversion is one of the ways to aquire power for the tribe.
Sure, that's a reasonable standard. But the problem is that earlier in the thread, there were people who called that Milei fellow in Argentina, who apparently converted to Judaism or something, a Jew. While I know of these people that they would also label everyone who is a Jew who converts to Christianity a Jew, except apparently the apostles.
????
White Nationalists have been critical of Milei. Maybe some of them might be falling for the gayop, but it doesn't appear to be many.
I mean initially. I doubt I can find the very first thread where I heard of Milei, but people here were like late 1990s schoolgirls meeting DiCaprio in real life.
Which people though? Lethn, Gizortnik, and TheImp were the ones sucking him off the most.
Ah the usual people who has very mixed track records of hot takes.
I can't find the thread, but as far as I remember, I was the only one saying that.
Not because of anything Jew-related, but because I thought he was just a bit weird. I'm not used to presidential candidates calling people "shit leftists".
For some reason your username never hit me, even though I've read The Merchant of Venice. The only motivation I can think of is for picking it is to troll, which if indeed true is well done.
Why is it trolling to pick the name of the most noble character in the play?
You're right (obviously), I was thinking Antonio was Shylock for some reason.
Apparently, Shylock didn't like that.
You make solid arguements, but there are no shades of gray for the conpro types. I would argue, however, that those of us who cheered for Afuerta and those downvoting you are mostly two separate groups of people on here.
I don't think you can raise it past 15 in Mexico without big trouble from the population, the quince is nearly sacred.