There's always a handful of people who can start connecting the dots after finally experiencing for themselves the true nature of the left, drawing the inference that "if the left lied to me about this one issue and demonised me for objecting, what else could they be lying about, and what if other groups of people I've been taught to demonise have been lied about just like I have?"
But most TERFs are just SJWs who hate trannies, and feminists who hate men so much that they can't even abide men who give up their masculinity. It's very much a "let them fight" situation, I'm glad that the troons have derailed their movement, and simply pointing to how viciously these people treat each other and saying "look at how they treat each other, now imagine how they'll treat you" is a really good way to get across to retarded normies who can't be reached with abstract reasoning.
That said, I've seen a significant number of TERFs come around to realizing they were on the wrong side. Many of them just got inducted into the cult when they were at a low point in their lives, and needed to experience the left in its Mr. Hyde form to start getting it. Which is frustrating enough on its own, but hey, it beats those who are too retarded or stubborn to even start the process of questioning if maybe they've been lied to about other things.
‘You did not appreciate the comments made by Mr Cooper and one person’s banter may be insulting to other people but that did not justify what you then went on to do.
‘You were seen to be approaching him, throwing your drink over him and then striking him deliberately in the face with the glass that you had. Your conduct was incomprehensible.
‘The only explanation that can really be put forward is that you were under the influence of drink, which does you no credit.
‘It was no doubt traumatic for Mr Cooper and it would have had an impact on him. Fortunately he seems to have made a good recovery.
The judge didn't give her a righteous female rage pass, he/she gave her an "upstanding mother" pass.
Women like this think that all the makeup they slather on makes them look ten years younger than they do, so they expect people to guess as such. And it does, in pictures with heavily curated angles and focal lengths. But in real life, makeup is very easy to spot and just makes you look gross. It's also easy to see through if you know what to look for.
The article title seems a bit misleading. The woman looks to be going to jail, just not immediately. edit: nvm I'm retarded
Dodd was sentenced to 12 months in prison, suspended for 12 months and was ordered to complete 180 hours of unpaid work. She was also ordered to pay £800 in compensation to her victim.
But like you're saying, quite lenient.
‘There is no doubt that this offence is so serious that it crosses the custody threshold. The issue is whether the sentence is immediate or can be suspended.
‘There can be no doubt in this case that you are no risk to the public and that this offence was entirely out of character and I suspect that having been so shaken by your own conduct the court will never see you again.
Perhaps more importantly you are a mother of a young child. Although, no doubt, the child would be taken care of, an immediate term of imprisonment would have a devastating effect on your child. It would be disproportionate to the sentence that needs to be imposed.’
The incident occurred on September 9 last year [...]
A suspended sentence is a sentence in which the period of incarceration is suspended. In effect it is exactly like getting parole on day 0.
So as long as this woman keeps her sentence conditions (shows up to community service plus whatever else) she will not see a single day inside an actual prison.
The fact that so many women like this evade jail after committing violent crimes on the basis of muh children is so mindnumbing in its own right.
You really think that someone who gets piss drunk and attacks strangers with broken glass is someone that child needs in their life?
Nvm that this excuse is almost never applied to fathers, even for victimless crimes.
Granting that foster care is almost always far worse than a shitty parent, so it should be a last resort, but if the kid has relatives to stay with, send that slag the message that she's a little too old to be acting like a spoiled teenage girl.
I can almost guarantee that thing is a single mother, and the odds are also good that whatever relatives still talk to her will not be willing to take in a child.
That said, foster care is still probably a better solution for society at that point. Things like her cannot be told they are free from the consequences of their actions, and for the child foster care into hopefully a two parent situation is a side grade at worst and potentially a big upgrade.
Nah, corporal punishment. Ten lashes and some time in the stockade. They only respond to animal level stimulus. You hurt someone you get hurt in return.
I think in many/most cases it's useless. All of the criminals that are in there that just gang up in prison and come out and go right back to their bullshit. What a waste of money and resources. I'd propose trying out some corporal punishment or something of that nature for lesser offences and expanded use of the death penalty for greater ones and continuously repeat offenders.
How would you deal with tax fraud? Honestly just curious. Or any other crime like that, tax evasion, insider trading, etc? Still find it baffling how some people get the bare minimum when they got some kinda celebrity bonus but if its uncle Joe who missed 10 bucks? 10 years easily(obviously exaggerated but similar have happened).
There's always a handful of people who can start connecting the dots after finally experiencing for themselves the true nature of the left, drawing the inference that "if the left lied to me about this one issue and demonised me for objecting, what else could they be lying about, and what if other groups of people I've been taught to demonise have been lied about just like I have?"
But most TERFs are just SJWs who hate trannies, and feminists who hate men so much that they can't even abide men who give up their masculinity. It's very much a "let them fight" situation, I'm glad that the troons have derailed their movement, and simply pointing to how viciously these people treat each other and saying "look at how they treat each other, now imagine how they'll treat you" is a really good way to get across to retarded normies who can't be reached with abstract reasoning.
That said, I've seen a significant number of TERFs come around to realizing they were on the wrong side. Many of them just got inducted into the cult when they were at a low point in their lives, and needed to experience the left in its Mr. Hyde form to start getting it. Which is frustrating enough on its own, but hey, it beats those who are too retarded or stubborn to even start the process of questioning if maybe they've been lied to about other things.
Yes this is common public beliefs. Men can be assaulted and battered by women.
That quote needs more context
The judge didn't give her a righteous female rage pass, he/she gave her an "upstanding mother" pass.
What a psycho. Not just for attacking the guy, but for thinking a correct guess +/-10% is any kind of insult at all.
I'm thinking she'd fly into rage even if he guessed entirely correctly.
Women like this think that all the makeup they slather on makes them look ten years younger than they do, so they expect people to guess as such. And it does, in pictures with heavily curated angles and focal lengths. But in real life, makeup is very easy to spot and just makes you look gross. It's also easy to see through if you know what to look for.
Female judges make a good commercial for the benefits of despotism.
The article title seems a bit misleading. The woman looks to be going to jail, just not immediately.edit: nvm I'm retardedBut like you're saying, quite lenient.
Guy, do you know what a suspended sentence is?
A suspended sentence is a sentence in which the period of incarceration is suspended. In effect it is exactly like getting parole on day 0.
So as long as this woman keeps her sentence conditions (shows up to community service plus whatever else) she will not see a single day inside an actual prison.
Ah. Thanks for informing me.
The fact that so many women like this evade jail after committing violent crimes on the basis of muh children is so mindnumbing in its own right.
You really think that someone who gets piss drunk and attacks strangers with broken glass is someone that child needs in their life?
Nvm that this excuse is almost never applied to fathers, even for victimless crimes.
Granting that foster care is almost always far worse than a shitty parent, so it should be a last resort, but if the kid has relatives to stay with, send that slag the message that she's a little too old to be acting like a spoiled teenage girl.
It's a demonstration that they aren't fit to raise those children, not a reason to keep them with them.
I can almost guarantee that thing is a single mother, and the odds are also good that whatever relatives still talk to her will not be willing to take in a child.
That said, foster care is still probably a better solution for society at that point. Things like her cannot be told they are free from the consequences of their actions, and for the child foster care into hopefully a two parent situation is a side grade at worst and potentially a big upgrade.
Both the defendant and the judge need a concussive glass-based cranium adjustment.
I'm very anti-prison, but these are the types of crimes that prison would be useful on. Put her in there a year to teach her a lesson.
Nah, corporal punishment. Ten lashes and some time in the stockade. They only respond to animal level stimulus. You hurt someone you get hurt in return.
Why are you anti-prison?
I think in many/most cases it's useless. All of the criminals that are in there that just gang up in prison and come out and go right back to their bullshit. What a waste of money and resources. I'd propose trying out some corporal punishment or something of that nature for lesser offences and expanded use of the death penalty for greater ones and continuously repeat offenders.
Behold, the only based Abolish Prisons advocate in the world
How would you deal with tax fraud? Honestly just curious. Or any other crime like that, tax evasion, insider trading, etc? Still find it baffling how some people get the bare minimum when they got some kinda celebrity bonus but if its uncle Joe who missed 10 bucks? 10 years easily(obviously exaggerated but similar have happened).
Mr. Cooper needs to get a good fucking lawyer and sue her for disfigurement and pain and suffering.
Bankrupt the bitch.