Gentleman and gamers, it’s been a pleasure
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
O7.
F.
This will age like milk.
See you in a year.
Just another failure of Biden and the DNC.
Thank you.
The best way to prevent $ assets from losing value too quickly. Start a few wars.
Doesn't help those of us local to the $, as it was never meant for us. We just need to keep paying taxes on depreciating currency so as to maintain the facade of addressing national debt/debt payments.
Think of us as a hamster on the wheel of the 'green' energy science project, and war is the diesel engine hidden under the table, providing the actual said energy in service of the school administration that are trying to receive funds for placing first.
Run Henry Run.
What did Biden do this time? For real, what did he do this time because I've been away the past couple of days.
Iran bombed Isreal with a 70-missile volley, nothing truly has happened yet beyond that statement, but people are justifiably alarmed, and worried at what the USA might do to intervene in the possible coming conflict.
Thanks, I got a horror vision of a lovechild of John Bolton and Mike Pompeo, two of the most abominable creatures in Washington.
The attack was unprovoked, Israel has every right to defend itself from hostile islamic tribes.
The Iran embassy just blew itself up on its own right?
The embassy is owner by Iran which is a hostile power. Since when are we defending hostile Islamic regimes?
He is not. He is pointing out that when you pick fights you will be fought straight back. Israel bombed an embassy so Iran responded, simple as that.
You fucking moron.
Embassies are not to be touched under any circumstances if you want to retain even a semblance of peaceful negotiations.
Consider for a moment that foreigners in the embassy were not combatants.
this time, demonstrably and verifiably untrue you disingenuous hack
Jews ain't dindunuffin
dinjewnuffin
Bombing an embassy is an act of war. Unprovoked my ass. This is FAFO.
NATO bombed the Chinese embassy in its 1999 bombing of Yugoslavia.
And it kicked off a huge shitstorm with people worried about WW3 starting.
Sweet Eris. Why on earth would you start a shooting war with a nuclear power? How can that turn out well?
They're counting that an attack that is for show won't provoke nuclear retaliation.
The Yom Kippur War was different in that for a moment, it looked like Israel might collapse. That was dangerous. But even that worked well for Egypt in the end, because it led to the Camp David accords.
They are fucking insane.
If Iran starts a war with Israel, then Israel will take out the Iranian nuclear enrichment program.
Doing that will be very, very hard with anything but A) Cooperation of the Iranians or B) a nuclear strike.
Israel has sworn to never let Iran get a nuclear weapon, and I can't say that they are wrong in that pledge.
I think I was unclear (being a massive faggot). I don't think the Iranians want a shooting war. They perfectly calibrated their 'attack' to accomplish absolutely nothing.
At the same time, there have been many instances of people taking on nuclear powers. It seems to make barely any difference. As long as you are not an existential threat, then nuclear weapons remain off the table.
I agree. I don't think the Iranians want a shooting war. That said, the Iranians are striving, day and night, to finish a nuclear weapon specifically so that they can vaporize Tel Aviv. The Iranians are itching for any pretext at all to end Iran as a potential nuclear threat; Up to and including nuking the hardened facilities in which uranium is enriched.
I don't particularly dislike your cock-sucking ways, Tony. The day I can't point out your massive faggotry is the day I leave and don't come back.
I'm not sure they are, but at the same time, it's a breath of fresh air to hear something... normal here rather than the constant "da joooz are evil".
The Iranian regime generally does what it can get away with. It is fairly cautious in international affairs. You rarely see it go out on a limb. Even when they have cockamamie schemes like assassinating the Saudi ambassador in Washington, it's something they don't face any consequences for - so a good prediction as to what they could get away with.
I fear that this would only encourage them to actually go full steam ahead trying to get a nuke. Right now, they're in the sweet spot of "they can develop one if they want to, but won't because that would actually lead to backlash" (at least, in my judgment). An all-out attack might change that calculus.
The day you forget to point out my massive faggotry is the day you won't be allowed to come back.
You supported John McCain?
No judgment. But in retrospect, are you sure your sentiment at the time was right?