Dignifai has been suspended from twitter
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Intimate? It could be quite easily argued the posts were the OPPOSITE of intimate.
This shows the war against AI isn't about muh sexism, it's about control
AlwaysHasBeen.jpg
Remember Tay?
Hell fuckin' yeah I do.
Bought the t-shirt and everything!
(I wonder if JIDF-chan will click the link and figure out that he owes me a downvote here...🤔)
It was this day when someone realized the "rules" aren't actually rules as the right or the dictionary would define them, and instead are just bludgeons to punish enemies of the left.
I always thought "anarcho-tyranny" was a contradictory term, until I read that it was the demonstrable double standard of "they're allowed to break the law/rules, but we'll make an example of you if you fart and I don't like it".
They shared the original along side their altered version though, correct?
Yes, except the photos that are being adjusted were freely shared and posted online by women, meaning they're okay with people seeing them, and with strangers doing whatever they want with their images.
The people in power and their useful idiot thots are probably arguing under the tired lines that women should "have control of their bodies". And yet, they're okay with destroying these women, in every conceivable way, turning them into tatted up whores with no redeeming values. The people AI adjusting their photos are showing what's being done to these women, how evil it is, and how much better women (and society) will be without this damaging influence. Thus, the people in power hate DignifAI and will censor it, as it runs counter to their agenda.
Wasn't the point of the twitter account to shame whores by posting "modest" AI edits of their publicly posted pics? I fail to see how doing that would violate this rule.
ISTR it included the original, immodest picture for comparison.
If the original picture was posted publicly, I don't see the problem.
If the original picture was posted behind a paywall, I also don't see the problem, but I could see how that would violate the rule.
I'd need to check, but it may be that while posted on a publicly-accessible website, the original image still did not meet Twitter standards.
Or, perhaps, the original image was a Twitter image that didn't meet standards, and was taken down at the same time DignifAI was - I don't know if that's been checked by anybody.
Twitter literally lets people post porn and at one point was the biggest CP repository online. I don't buy it.
If it was distributed on X, how can they deem it still privately distributed? Garbage.
Did it hit a nerve?
I bet the ones with the thots well dressed and holding babies did lol
Bigly. I never thought I'd see women offended at being dressed up to cover exposed skin...but I guess that gets in the way of the sex narrative.
Some of them should be flattered with the AI. Mr. Burns hinted in a very old Simpsons episode that women can be more attractive fully clothed in very elegant clothing where they make you chase them just to see their skin. I'm somewhat in agreement there.
When butt hurt bitches mass-report an account, it automatically gets locked. The account has been back online for quite some time now. Rushing into conclusions is never a good idea.
I didn't follow this, but my gut says it was for making edits of photos that were ONLY meant to be distributed through OnlyFans, thus were not allowed to be shared, let alone edited, at all.
Like those Patreon artists (human ones) who only share their unedited uncompressed work through that site, especially now that DeviantArt is starting to crack down.
Had the edits been of regular stuff you could find through Google Image Search, it would have been fine.
Just my theory, though. It was a neat AI idea.
I think the majority- if not all, were pics for advertising their OnlyFans on X. If it's accessible by the public, anything posted on the Internet is public.
Ah, a technicality. Very well, then.
...the fuck's with the downvotes? I was just saying "Oh, that's the answer? Alright." How did THAT get taken as insulting?
Elon is not your fren.
But don't you want to have a brain implant while being tracked by a billion satellites as your life force is harvested to sustain a Mars mission?
🤣
He must have posted a picture of one of Elon's side pieces and has to bah-lete it to get his account back.
If these companies had storefronts so people could walk in and ask for an explanation most of this wouldn't have happened.
So much of what's going wrong in the world is because no one lives with the threat of being punched in the face for their wrongdoing.
why is that even a rule
They keep removing my favorite accounts, like the one that would just repost insane tranny shit from Reddit. X is not what Elon likes to pretend it is.
Looks like it was probably just auto-locked due to mass reports and is back already.
Comment Reported for: TheImp
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech