That'll be South Africa North, from now on. People of the English countryside, prepare to have your land redistributed and then ruined by retards.
Kate Palmer, HR advice and consultancy director at employment law consultancy Peninsula, said that while diversity should be an important focus for organisations, employers should be careful with their wording.
You just gotta word it better. Not actually stop being racist. Don't give away the game plan.
And suddenly everything of importance stops working and can't be maintained...
It'll fail, the migrants will quickly leave when the economy falls and they need to put in effort as handouts stop and then all the UK government are left with is a disgruntled population who they largely ignored as an inconvenience.
The only thing they can be fortunate in is unlike other countries, they won't be mass executed for their incompetence.
The best thing about identity politics is that diversity becomes the metric for success so even when everything starts going poorly it will still be a success.
As for the population, I have doubts, white people are becoming a minority and the foreigners are used to worse standards of living so it will take a long time for enough people to get pissed off. White people can starve to death in large numbers and it will still not be enough to change anything, most of minorities would cheer for that.
Even with everything of importance not working, the rich and powerful will still be rich and powerful. Arguably, they'll be richer and more powerful. Take any African country and you still have super wealthy warlords living like kings. The elite running our society want to be just like that. They want everything to crumble and for you to live like an African.
No it doesn't depend. Racism is the same thing as preferential treatment your own family, friends, or associates. Your race is an extension of like characteristics based on shared culture and lineage. Basically a massive kin group.
The whole point of these behaviors is in group preference at the cost of outsiders. The whole point is the outsiders get the short end of the stick, thereby encouraging and promoting group membership.
Why would you be a part of a group that doesn't show preference for group members? Imagine joining a union that pays people not in the union higher wages? Imagine people telling union members they have less benefits by joining the union. It's ridiculous. Successful groups prioritize the group, not the outsiders.
Your utopian dream is impossible and it has led to the exact situation we’re in now. Where one side doesn’t want to be racist (in-group bias) but the other side has deemed racism as fine. Different cultures have different norms and morals. You expect all of these groups to play by the same rules and that’s just asinine.
Ya I do agree with other people having the right to discriminate and demonstrate preference for their people. It's natural and will not ever change. You're butthurt because you swallowed the Kool aid that it's better to be fair and give your's away, and now you're mad because other people have a brain and prefer to prioritize themselves and their kin.
Why would I have a problem with self/group preservation? Its pure folly to expect someone or something to destroy itself so some other organism can thrive in its place.
Racism was a term basically invented and rose to popularity in the 1960's during the civil rights movement. It was used as a wedge to destroy white European society, it does not actually involve "equality, justice, fairness" or any other concept like that. Those used to be covered with the word called "honor" but communists will never focus on that as a concept.
How in the world do they justify that. It’s pure insanity how you can be the majority population and be treated like this. A group of people at the top keep pushing these insane policies and brainwashing ppl
You are right but it makes zero sense. If a woman is qualified by all means let her apply. The moronic idea that everything has to “look like the world around us” or we need more women in this field is dumb and nobody ever pushes back and asks them to explain why
It said: “An aim to have an organisation less dominated by white men, in areas where traditionally that is the dominant profile, does not mean that there is an intention to achieve that objective by discriminating in recruitment against white men.”
Ah, so they're going with the bald faced lies then. Because that is exactly what the intention of that statement is.
It started with you can't be sexist against men. Then you can't be racist against whites. All feminist principles. We shouldn't be surprised at this outcome as we have accepted feminism as sane and logical by indoctrinating our children with it.
It said: “An aim to have an organisation less dominated by white men, in areas where traditionally that is the dominant profile, does not mean that there is an intention to achieve that objective by discriminating in recruitment against white men.”
So UK authorities are unable to use basic logic. How much longer can the country keep functioning?
IMO the guy torpedoed his own case by asking for $100K, $20K more than the $80K being offered (the winning candidate asked for $78K). He also interviewed poorly - talked too much and came across as arrogant.
I've been in similar situations where a candidate is good on paper, but they don't interview well or their expectations are outside of what the role offers. This typically means they make it past the first interview mainly on the strength of their resume, but will be quickly dismissed if other candidates fit within the parameters of what's being offered.
$20K in salary is a huge difference at this level - I would take someone with less experience, but who I thought could be molded into the role with time, over someone asking for way more than the salary offered and who already has a couple of red flags.
TLDR - guy could have had a case if he had been smarter about it.
Of course it's a possibility the guy wasn't the actual best candidate for the job, but that's immaterial compared to the conclusions of the government that barring white men from jobs isn't discrimination.
That'll be South Africa North, from now on. People of the English countryside, prepare to have your land redistributed and then ruined by retards.
You just gotta word it better. Not actually stop being racist. Don't give away the game plan.
As if. The UK will give everything to women.
They already ruled white women are entitled to protection.
They also ruled that you can't discriminate against feminist beliefs, the Maya Forstater case.
And suddenly everything of importance stops working and can't be maintained...
It'll fail, the migrants will quickly leave when the economy falls and they need to put in effort as handouts stop and then all the UK government are left with is a disgruntled population who they largely ignored as an inconvenience.
The only thing they can be fortunate in is unlike other countries, they won't be mass executed for their incompetence.
The best thing about identity politics is that diversity becomes the metric for success so even when everything starts going poorly it will still be a success.
As for the population, I have doubts, white people are becoming a minority and the foreigners are used to worse standards of living so it will take a long time for enough people to get pissed off. White people can starve to death in large numbers and it will still not be enough to change anything, most of minorities would cheer for that.
Like the "highest grossing movie from a black female director," that is still hundreds of millions in the red?
Even with everything of importance not working, the rich and powerful will still be rich and powerful. Arguably, they'll be richer and more powerful. Take any African country and you still have super wealthy warlords living like kings. The elite running our society want to be just like that. They want everything to crumble and for you to live like an African.
Hope the elites invest in armored cars and gas generators like the South Africans do.
Can’t spell cuck without UK!
As an Englishman, this hurts.
It hurts even more that so many here close their eyes in life, and prove it true.
What can you do? Women are the problem and no one will stand against them.
Oh, shut up. You’ve sailed past annoying, though satire, and now you’re just coasting in boring.
I warned you multiple times about Sally's Law, and it passed.
Deluding yourself won't change that.
You’ve consistently dribbled and ranted about how women are evil.
You are, in a word, tedious.
Racism is fine. The problem is English and Scots not being racist. If they were racist they wouldn't be replaced by foreigners.
No it doesn't depend. Racism is the same thing as preferential treatment your own family, friends, or associates. Your race is an extension of like characteristics based on shared culture and lineage. Basically a massive kin group.
The whole point of these behaviors is in group preference at the cost of outsiders. The whole point is the outsiders get the short end of the stick, thereby encouraging and promoting group membership.
Why would you be a part of a group that doesn't show preference for group members? Imagine joining a union that pays people not in the union higher wages? Imagine people telling union members they have less benefits by joining the union. It's ridiculous. Successful groups prioritize the group, not the outsiders.
Your utopian dream is impossible and it has led to the exact situation we’re in now. Where one side doesn’t want to be racist (in-group bias) but the other side has deemed racism as fine. Different cultures have different norms and morals. You expect all of these groups to play by the same rules and that’s just asinine.
Ya I do agree with other people having the right to discriminate and demonstrate preference for their people. It's natural and will not ever change. You're butthurt because you swallowed the Kool aid that it's better to be fair and give your's away, and now you're mad because other people have a brain and prefer to prioritize themselves and their kin.
Why would I have a problem with self/group preservation? Its pure folly to expect someone or something to destroy itself so some other organism can thrive in its place.
Racism was a term basically invented and rose to popularity in the 1960's during the civil rights movement. It was used as a wedge to destroy white European society, it does not actually involve "equality, justice, fairness" or any other concept like that. Those used to be covered with the word called "honor" but communists will never focus on that as a concept.
How in the world do they justify that. It’s pure insanity how you can be the majority population and be treated like this. A group of people at the top keep pushing these insane policies and brainwashing ppl
Because no one is going to draw and quarter them in the street for doing so.
You are right but it makes zero sense. If a woman is qualified by all means let her apply. The moronic idea that everything has to “look like the world around us” or we need more women in this field is dumb and nobody ever pushes back and asks them to explain why
Ah, so they're going with the bald faced lies then. Because that is exactly what the intention of that statement is.
It started with you can't be sexist against men. Then you can't be racist against whites. All feminist principles. We shouldn't be surprised at this outcome as we have accepted feminism as sane and logical by indoctrinating our children with it.
And people think that allying with women will save us.
It just makes everything worse.
So UK authorities are unable to use basic logic. How much longer can the country keep functioning?
It'll be interesting to see the UK version of Orania.
Time will tell if it's just an attempt to escape or if it will be a base to strike back and take back what was stolen from them.
"Words don't have the same meaning when we target them against what we deem to be morally degenerate races."
OP's article's is a bit shit and leaves out a few key details, better article here: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12880681/jobseeker-lose-race-sex-discrimination-white-men.html
IMO the guy torpedoed his own case by asking for $100K, $20K more than the $80K being offered (the winning candidate asked for $78K). He also interviewed poorly - talked too much and came across as arrogant.
I've been in similar situations where a candidate is good on paper, but they don't interview well or their expectations are outside of what the role offers. This typically means they make it past the first interview mainly on the strength of their resume, but will be quickly dismissed if other candidates fit within the parameters of what's being offered.
$20K in salary is a huge difference at this level - I would take someone with less experience, but who I thought could be molded into the role with time, over someone asking for way more than the salary offered and who already has a couple of red flags.
TLDR - guy could have had a case if he had been smarter about it.
Of course it's a possibility the guy wasn't the actual best candidate for the job, but that's immaterial compared to the conclusions of the government that barring white men from jobs isn't discrimination.