Just because they haven't moved out of Mums house fully, doesn't mean they don't have their own culture. I mean, look at Australian beer and Canadian not being America.
Yes to one or both questions - are both of you from the same country? Where you currently live?
The reason why I assumed you were a different ethnicity is because you referred to her as Slavic specifically, which seemed to imply you weren't, but I guess that's wrong.
Sure I would, because it's statistically true anyway. An outlier is an outlier.
And the existence of an outlier does not preclude a general rule, and vice versa.
Which means that, in our extended metaphor, not only should you not eat anything from the bowl, but you should kill the jackass that offered it to you in the first place.
Majority can't be rounded up to an absolute and claimed as a factual statement. No statistician would say 95% IS 100%. Using 'statistic' as an adjective doesn't give your false claim credibility. That's not proper statistics. Not all immigration is warfare. Saying things that aren't true is wrong.
It is if your country is being strained by the increase in population while your indigenous/citizen populations are being propagandised to not reproduce. Even if every immigrant were legal and law-abiding, it's still a negative outcome being enacted on the general population against their will. Most people aren't just not voting for this, but actively against it.
One countries' brain drain is another's boon. I'd say there's some not insubstantial benefits from legal immigration. So all immigration isn't warfare.
I don't think burning public transportation will change much. There are much better places to set alight if you're trying to engage with your government.
*For legal reasons this is simply an observation and not a call to action.
BLM seemed to pick very appropriate things to destroy in Minneapolis, like local businesses, a low-income apartment complex in construction, and a police precinct that contained evidence for criminal cases. It certainly got the job done.
The Micks need to wise up like the Netherlanders did.
Wilders won. The Netherlands is now--if he can form a coalition--on the same path as Poland and Hungary. Still, I don't know anything about the intricacies of Dutch politics and why coalitions are needed in the first place, but I digress . . .
All governments of western Europe need to be toppled.
All immigration is warfare.
Not all immigration is warfare. Two peer countries allowing free movement is not, but importing a hostile war cult is.
Give me an example of two peer countries.
Canada and Australia
In that they are both Chinese vassal states?
That's a slow burn take over. They take generations to turn the culture completely Chinese.
Neither are real countries imo. Both are just extensions, if slight variations of the cuckoldry that has ensnared Britain.
Just because they haven't moved out of Mums house fully, doesn't mean they don't have their own culture. I mean, look at Australian beer and Canadian not being America.
I've been to both places. Canada in particular. I'll stand by it. They're just mild variations of Brit.
I'm not disagreeing, I'm pointing out how the two countries will respond.
Whatever two heritages you and your wife are from. Based on what you've said before, you're either an immigrant or she is.
Incorrect on both counts. Military brats, for example, are frequently born overseas but are natural citizens.
Particularly as we're both white.
Well, you mentioned she was Slavic. Are you Slavic as well? Or maybe from the same country in Eastern Europe?
Indeed I am.
Yes to one or both questions - are both of you from the same country? Where you currently live?
The reason why I assumed you were a different ethnicity is because you referred to her as Slavic specifically, which seemed to imply you weren't, but I guess that's wrong.
That's silly. I'm a legal immigrant and I'm not an agent of warfare.
Even IF one of the M&Ms isn't poisoned, I still wouldn't eat any.
But you wouldn't claim something false like that ALL the M&Ms are poisoned.
I'd claim that it's enough that I don't care how many are poisoned. It's too many to risk eating any.
It might as well be all of them.
Regardless, you would be sensible enough not to actually make a false statement, because you believe that it's wrong to say things that aren't true.
Sure I would, because it's statistically true anyway. An outlier is an outlier.
And the existence of an outlier does not preclude a general rule, and vice versa.
Which means that, in our extended metaphor, not only should you not eat anything from the bowl, but you should kill the jackass that offered it to you in the first place.
Majority can't be rounded up to an absolute and claimed as a factual statement. No statistician would say 95% IS 100%. Using 'statistic' as an adjective doesn't give your false claim credibility. That's not proper statistics. Not all immigration is warfare. Saying things that aren't true is wrong.
Whine all you please about petty semantics. We're done eating from the bowl, and we're going to shove it back.
Just don't state false claims. There's better ways of making your point than hysterical exaggerations.
But I would still say I don't want this brown M&M in my bowl of white M&Ms.
That doesn't enter into it. I'm arguing against making incorrect statement of facts.
Youre the exception not the rule
Perhaps, but not ALL immigration is warfare.
It is if your country is being strained by the increase in population while your indigenous/citizen populations are being propagandised to not reproduce. Even if every immigrant were legal and law-abiding, it's still a negative outcome being enacted on the general population against their will. Most people aren't just not voting for this, but actively against it.
One countries' brain drain is another's boon. I'd say there's some not insubstantial benefits from legal immigration. So all immigration isn't warfare.
You might not harbor any hostilities or be actively contributing to the war effort but you're still part of it, albeit unknowingly.
You guys actually agree and are phrasing it in different ways.
If our government handled non-white immigration as stringently as they do white immigration, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
News media is scum. I remember them clutching their pearls when Trump called them the enemy of the people
2 vehicles on fire?
"omg the apocalypse"
or
"Mostly peaceful protest for justice"
depending on narrative compliance.
I don't think burning public transportation will change much. There are much better places to set alight if you're trying to engage with your government.
*For legal reasons this is simply an observation and not a call to action.
BLM seemed to pick very appropriate things to destroy in Minneapolis, like local businesses, a low-income apartment complex in construction, and a police precinct that contained evidence for criminal cases. It certainly got the job done.
"If we can't have Ireland, no one can"
Irish Geert Wilders when?
The Irish bombed people for trying to take over for decades and are suddenly blamed when the exact same thing happens and they do nothing.
This is the modern government reaction: Pretend like it's not happening. Reinforce the vision of what you say is happening. Multiculturalism.
did the identity of the attacker get released yet? I know it was a 50yo individual but do we have a mug shot?
The Micks need to wise up like the Netherlanders did.
Wilders won. The Netherlands is now--if he can form a coalition--on the same path as Poland and Hungary. Still, I don't know anything about the intricacies of Dutch politics and why coalitions are needed in the first place, but I digress . . .
Imagine if the French ever manage to elect LePen.
Death to the EU!
When even White people have lost control, you know it's the end of the world.