Sure I would, because it's statistically true anyway. An outlier is an outlier.
And the existence of an outlier does not preclude a general rule, and vice versa.
Which means that, in our extended metaphor, not only should you not eat anything from the bowl, but you should kill the jackass that offered it to you in the first place.
Majority can't be rounded up to an absolute and claimed as a factual statement. No statistician would say 95% IS 100%. Using 'statistic' as an adjective doesn't give your false claim credibility. That's not proper statistics. Not all immigration is warfare. Saying things that aren't true is wrong.
Sure I would, because it's statistically true anyway. An outlier is an outlier.
And the existence of an outlier does not preclude a general rule, and vice versa.
Which means that, in our extended metaphor, not only should you not eat anything from the bowl, but you should kill the jackass that offered it to you in the first place.
Majority can't be rounded up to an absolute and claimed as a factual statement. No statistician would say 95% IS 100%. Using 'statistic' as an adjective doesn't give your false claim credibility. That's not proper statistics. Not all immigration is warfare. Saying things that aren't true is wrong.
Whine all you please about petty semantics. We're done eating from the bowl, and we're going to shove it back.
Just don't state false claims. There's better ways of making your point than hysterical exaggerations.
It's not false. Immigration is war.
It's also rape.