I bet ceasing all foreign military aid (to Israel and otherwise), closing the borders, implementing more restrictive immigration laws, and pursuing a fair foreign policy that spreads prosperity and freedom instead of war and economic slavery would go a long way actually.
The answer is western chauvinism and nationalism. If you don't believe yourself and your people to be worthy to inherit your ancestors wealth and lands, you will find no obstacle in giving it away.
It could help. Not solve, that's for sure, but certainly might help.
Closing the borders to them, and restricting immigration laws, good start. As would cutting off all their communications, internet, etc. And restricting trade routes. Wait, now we're sounding all Isreal-y. And no conflict ever came around them.
if this is true, and OP makes it sound like it is, then Israel needs to either evacuate or completely genocide the entire region. Anything short of these two outcomes means more forever wars.
Given that genocide is always objectively bad, it stands to reason that the best course of action then is to simply evacuate Israel.
That's pretty funny lol. No doubt this will be broadcast by the "kill em all and let God sort em out" boomer crew over the next few weeks. Criticizing the provenance of the data will be hard: AWRAD appears to be a Palestinian organization.
So what next? My problem with the pro-Israeli side is twofold. First, "kill em all" is not a real solution. The "real" solution appears to be dumping Palestinians in Spain and Greece. Two, if you poll Jews, most of them have a pretty low view of white people too.
Right on schedule lol, here comes the "nuke them" option - with a twist.
We could obviously never do that because the US would have to prop up Israel before they get consequently destroyed by Russia, which would lead to World War III. Why prop up Israel? Because we have more Jews over here than over there.
It's working on enough people. Especially the idiots.
Don't get me wrong, I think Israel is the least bad of the two, and hamas are a bunch of terrorists, but I don't want us blowing money on their fight either.
Depending on how large of a proportion the area with fighting entails, it sounds so bizarre to me to have a survey with war happening inside your territory. With that said, how on earth do you get a random sample?
Then, exposing my ignorance here, would political violence be a factor in the responses? That is, are people routinely killed there for not supporting the current leadership?
Comment Approved: A) This is literally Sargon's "I wouldn't even rape you". Hence it is NOT violent speech. It is, in fact, anti-violent. The worst it does is imply people are ugly. B) "Khazar Milkers" wasn't invented by anyone outside of the Alt-right, sooooo...
This is true across the entire Muslim world, not just Palestine.
They aren't all terrorists, but like 95% support terrorist activity when polled. There is no peace with these people.
Same on nearly every other topic that the left cares so much about -- Islam is not interested in that shit.
How many Jews seem to support whites being raped, tortured and killed in our homelands?
Tell them not me.
Huh?
A lot of useful idiots think if they just get rid of Israel it'll be peaceful. No, they'll just come after us next.
How did supporting Israel protect us from Muslims? Oh right, it didn’t.
Nothing will stop them, you brainlet.
I bet ceasing all foreign military aid (to Israel and otherwise), closing the borders, implementing more restrictive immigration laws, and pursuing a fair foreign policy that spreads prosperity and freedom instead of war and economic slavery would go a long way actually.
no, because we're still infidels and must be shown the sword until we submit.
they operate under two worlds: the world of islam and the world of war.
And...then they eventually come after us anyway, because that's how they are.
This is like the retarded boomer take on "just take over the middle east", just the reverse. And just as bad.
Just redirecting the resources we waste on Israel and jew wars towards national security would be enough to prevent that.
Uh huh.
I can see you're one of the 'muh jews' people, so I'm not going to bother trying to convince you of anything. Not worth more of my time or energy.
The answer is western chauvinism and nationalism. If you don't believe yourself and your people to be worthy to inherit your ancestors wealth and lands, you will find no obstacle in giving it away.
It could help. Not solve, that's for sure, but certainly might help.
Closing the borders to them, and restricting immigration laws, good start. As would cutting off all their communications, internet, etc. And restricting trade routes. Wait, now we're sounding all Isreal-y. And no conflict ever came around them.
if this is true, and OP makes it sound like it is, then Israel needs to either evacuate or completely genocide the entire region. Anything short of these two outcomes means more forever wars.
Given that genocide is always objectively bad, it stands to reason that the best course of action then is to simply evacuate Israel.
Don't care still not supporting Israel
Buuuuut the 6 gorillion! But rape! But skin lamps! But babies beheaded!
That's pretty funny lol. No doubt this will be broadcast by the "kill em all and let God sort em out" boomer crew over the next few weeks. Criticizing the provenance of the data will be hard: AWRAD appears to be a Palestinian organization.
So what next? My problem with the pro-Israeli side is twofold. First, "kill em all" is not a real solution. The "real" solution appears to be dumping Palestinians in Spain and Greece. Two, if you poll Jews, most of them have a pretty low view of white people too.
The solution is to (not literally, but figuratively) wall off the middle east and let them sort it out. If Israel nukes everyone over there, so be it.
That's their problem.
Right on schedule lol, here comes the "nuke them" option - with a twist.
We could obviously never do that because the US would have to prop up Israel before they get consequently destroyed by Russia, which would lead to World War III. Why prop up Israel? Because we have more Jews over here than over there.
the treebeard party
i'm on nobody's side, because nobody's on my side.
It's working on enough people. Especially the idiots.
Don't get me wrong, I think Israel is the least bad of the two, and hamas are a bunch of terrorists, but I don't want us blowing money on their fight either.
Postulate: arming both sides ensures maximum casualties on both sides.
Biden - 5D chess?
Only 82% support terrorism, murder, and rape.
And people wonder why I don't a fuck if the west bank got glassed.
Only 63% in the gaza. "only"
The question is also biased, but w/e.
Comment Reported for: Encouraging genocide.
Comment Approved: "I don't give a fuck if" is not the encouraging of a genocide. It is, at most, the apathy to one.
Guess the 'muh jews' people got butthurt. It's absolutely apathy.
Depending on how large of a proportion the area with fighting entails, it sounds so bizarre to me to have a survey with war happening inside your territory. With that said, how on earth do you get a random sample?
Then, exposing my ignorance here, would political violence be a factor in the responses? That is, are people routinely killed there for not supporting the current leadership?
Top keks.
As though anyone would willingly rape Jew women.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Approved: A) This is literally Sargon's "I wouldn't even rape you". Hence it is NOT violent speech. It is, in fact, anti-violent. The worst it does is imply people are ugly. B) "Khazar Milkers" wasn't invented by anyone outside of the Alt-right, sooooo...
It's weird how a certain tribe seems to think every mention of said tribe (that isn't gushing, effusive praise) is somehow "violent speech."
Makes you wonder, why they seem to think even noticing their existence leads to violence...