My favorite part of this whole debacle is how defenders reach for “you weren’t this mad when your priests were abusing kids!” It’s like, did you even pay attention when that went down? We were FURIOUS. We are STILL furious. Meanwhile these same people making that argument hope we ignore that a lot of them also want to abuse kids, they just want to normalize it rather than doing it in secret. Not much different between those two options to me, they both ought to end at a woodchipper.
A campaign that attempted to reclaim some of the land that had been invaded by rampaging barbarians in the previous centuries, during which those barbarians defaced and destroyed some of the most iconic Christian monuments of the time.
The Christians did not even remotely push all the way into reclaiming all of their lost territory.
No leftist believes anything they say. Literally every word that comes out of their mouths is designed to distract and mislead. The sooner everyone understands this, the better.
But that goes against the whole love your neighbor commandment. I guess I just get tired of people who think they are being edgy or provocative by bashing Christianity
There's a famous phrase in the Bhagavat Gita, that is apt but get's partially quoted by much the same people that would like the tolerant (love thy neighbor Christians) to lie down and accept their servitude. It is a reply to a question asking, isn't non-violence most important? The reply is 'Non violence is the highest duty/righteousness, unless there is no other way for duty/righteousness. ' So kill the fucking evil fucks [paraphrasing the last line].
The same reason we gave police a monopoly on violence, but they are now just security guards for some level of government.
I’ve heard theologians say that self defense is ok. Some Christian pacifists literally say to just stand there and let yourself be killed. Now if I was captured by taliban and they said deny Christ or die then I’d have to die but I will defend loved ones from evil. No question
Do the crusaders strike anyone as ''love thy neighbor'' faggots? Take a look at how heretics were dealt with in true Christian societies. There has been and is an initiative from a certain group of someones to keep Christians docile.
Even the Love the Lord thy God with all your heart soul and mind and love your neighbor as yourself? But this has been a question I’ve been wondering about. Although the Good Samaritan is parable where she shows love to a total stranger. But I guess with people who mock the faith is what you are referring to?
I imagine the DNC is going to retreat on that pretty fast now that they're figuring out Hispanics parents aren't going to be glared into supporting having their children castrated and mutilated.
Except they will vote Democrats, their religion is not that strong. They will condemn it but they will vote for who ever gives them the most perks.
Accepting heresy vs affirmative action and money and they will betray their religion in a heartbeat. They also have no problem being anti-white despite being against Christian teachings.
Same thing with the anti-LGBT2SIAQ+ grooming muslims, they will virtue signal that they are against it while voting for those that support it.
Even native Christians that discovered boycotts don't plan on boycotting for more then a month, having to drive another couple of miles to not support mutilating kids is a step to much for most.
I'm a bit black-pilled on the entire religious people being conservative.
This isn't related to the presidential election. Neither DeSantis or Trump are mentioned in the article. Your comment comes across as pure evil to anyone remotely religious. (many of whom support Trump)
My favorite part of this whole debacle is how defenders reach for “you weren’t this mad when your priests were abusing kids!” It’s like, did you even pay attention when that went down? We were FURIOUS. We are STILL furious. Meanwhile these same people making that argument hope we ignore that a lot of them also want to abuse kids, they just want to normalize it rather than doing it in secret. Not much different between those two options to me, they both ought to end at a woodchipper.
"You weren't mad enough at those child molesters abusing kids, so you should let these child molesters abuse kids!"
Makes sense
Rhetorical warfare. They don't really believe that.
A campaign that attempted to reclaim some of the land that had been invaded by rampaging barbarians in the previous centuries, during which those barbarians defaced and destroyed some of the most iconic Christian monuments of the time.
The Christians did not even remotely push all the way into reclaiming all of their lost territory.
No leftist believes anything they say. Literally every word that comes out of their mouths is designed to distract and mislead. The sooner everyone understands this, the better.
Imagine being stupid enough to believe deflection is a sound strategy to safeguard groomers. Only leftists are that brain damaged.
Good to see. Also if they are so brave go mock Islam. I’m waiting
Christians should treat people that mock their religion the exact same way.
But that goes against the whole love your neighbor commandment. I guess I just get tired of people who think they are being edgy or provocative by bashing Christianity
There's a famous phrase in the Bhagavat Gita, that is apt but get's partially quoted by much the same people that would like the tolerant (love thy neighbor Christians) to lie down and accept their servitude. It is a reply to a question asking, isn't non-violence most important? The reply is 'Non violence is the highest duty/righteousness, unless there is no other way for duty/righteousness. ' So kill the fucking evil fucks [paraphrasing the last line].
The same reason we gave police a monopoly on violence, but they are now just security guards for some level of government.
I’ve heard theologians say that self defense is ok. Some Christian pacifists literally say to just stand there and let yourself be killed. Now if I was captured by taliban and they said deny Christ or die then I’d have to die but I will defend loved ones from evil. No question
Thing is, if you only take action when it is unbearable, you will find yourself out of the tent in the cold and the camel in bed with your wife.
It's why you need to viciously safeguard your boundaries, or find yourself left to the tender mercies of reservation/street life.
You aren’t wrong. That is probably one of my main struggles as a Christian.
I'm sure you will win that struggle. Keep fighting the good fight!
Do the crusaders strike anyone as ''love thy neighbor'' faggots? Take a look at how heretics were dealt with in true Christian societies. There has been and is an initiative from a certain group of someones to keep Christians docile.
Weren’t they being terrorized by Muslims at that time? I feel you should make every attempt but if it breaks down you have to fight
Are Christians in the west not being terrorized now? The difference between then and now is that back then they fought, now they comply...
These things all literal demons. I don’t think God commanded you to love demons.
That "neighbor" is a term that includes your enemies seems to be a fairly recent belief.
Even the Love the Lord thy God with all your heart soul and mind and love your neighbor as yourself? But this has been a question I’ve been wondering about. Although the Good Samaritan is parable where she shows love to a total stranger. But I guess with people who mock the faith is what you are referring to?
Yep. Exactly
Now if only conservative Mexicans in LA were legal so they could vote . . . maybe illegals in LA can vote, come to think on it.
Maybe they can as blue areas have made so many pushes to include illegals on elections.
I imagine the DNC is going to retreat on that pretty fast now that they're figuring out Hispanics parents aren't going to be glared into supporting having their children castrated and mutilated.
Except they will vote Democrats, their religion is not that strong. They will condemn it but they will vote for who ever gives them the most perks. Accepting heresy vs affirmative action and money and they will betray their religion in a heartbeat. They also have no problem being anti-white despite being against Christian teachings. Same thing with the anti-LGBT2SIAQ+ grooming muslims, they will virtue signal that they are against it while voting for those that support it.
Even native Christians that discovered boycotts don't plan on boycotting for more then a month, having to drive another couple of miles to not support mutilating kids is a step to much for most.
I'm a bit black-pilled on the entire religious people being conservative.
Dang for a second I was hoping to read about 1000 dwarfs that were all catholic priests confronting the degenerates
Blessed and Godpilled 🙌
Should have been millions. Hispanic Catholics talked big but really wimped out on this one.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This doesn't make them morally inferior.
Why do you always support trannies?
You hate women and support trannies?
Odds are likely you yourself are a tranny.
You will never be a real woman and Trump will never fuck you even though you yearn for it with how much you suck him off.
This isn't related to the presidential election. Neither DeSantis or Trump are mentioned in the article. Your comment comes across as pure evil to anyone remotely religious. (many of whom support Trump)
You know I'm starting to come around on him. He may be a total MIGA but if these are his enemies, it says something about his allies.
Those are normies, most of them didn't even know it was pride night until they got to the stadium.
But of course you dick ride DeSantis because he's subservient to the tribe...
Wait, that's your reason?
I thought it was because he was pro car dealerships with a carve out for Tesla.
At least call him Meatball Ron as that is a more amusing term than DeSimps