I don't know why even half of this place is so obsessed with loli shit.
Like of course I know it's not real child porn. But I can't help feeling icky about the fact that a known hentai artist is making a "romantic comedy" series about an underage girl tormenting a boy? You can pretend all you want, but he knows exactly what he is doing.
Comment Reported for: Slander over artwork, ban the cunt
Point out that someone is the moderator of https://communities.win/c/lolisho, and all of a sudden they go full commie. You tried to report my post for slander, but slander requires falsehoods.
Your reaction shows your shame. You know it to be immoral degeneracy, otherwise you wouldn't care when someone points out that you are the moderator of lolisho.
Go ahead, point out that I created https://communities.win/c/jewishcontributions. See if I sperg out demanding bans for anyone who mention it. I won't because I am not ashamed of it.
It's cognitive dissonance and shame that you are feeling. You know that you masturbating to images of cartoon children is wrong. You do it anyways and attack those who condemn you for it. It is your shame.
I'm not saying they can't do great work in another topic.
BUT!
The guy doing Nagatoro is OBVIOUSLY doing it in a way that is basically 1 step away from loli porn.
The issue isn't that the artist does hentai. But you don't just do porn, then switch to underage "rom com" that is about this little girl basically bullying a boy into submission and say it wasn't done with the exact same kind of tropes/character writing he would do for the porn.
This is my issue.
I wouldn't even have an issue with it if it was adult characters. Sure, I wouldn't care, because not my shit, but you don't do kiddie characters with the typical porn fetish type dynamics when you are known for porn, then pretend it's not a little sus.
Nope, definitely Nagatoro. Nanashi had QUITE the resume of hentai doujins and artworks before making Nagatoro, and had to go on quite the online cleaning spree the moment it got picked up for anime adaptation. Though didn't Nanashi also write the story, unlike those artists I mentioned earlier who were just tapped for character designs?
This is where I'm at with the "loli" issue. I don't freaking care, since it doesn't harm real children, but the absolute need to go to the ends of the earth to "protect" it has annoyed me to no end. Stop bringing that shit up unless you're actively looking to have people infer you're a pedophile.
The only reason it comes up more than something like feral is because feral is often legal, making so the people who hate it keep to themselves.
Fights occur over lolisho because it's often banned federally and many sites refuse to host it in countries where it's legal, causing arguments about the shit to FREQUENTLY flare up.
If it was legal then people would shut up about it because it's not child porn.
...he's going to be found out to have done something with REAL kids isn't he?
You can be anti loli or enjoy the fictional content, it's the PERFORMANCE that has my 'he's done some bad shit' senses tingling. It's like trying to quickly help you parents out of the blue because you just broke something. The big display you're doing is a red flag as most people just don't consume that media because they don't like it.
That really doesn't make any sense to the current argument, is this one of those twitter 'dunk' lines that gets used when under examination is as hollow as a reality star's head?
I would not assume this "came out of nowhere." Ethan is always surrounded by drama and trolls and this tweet is probably a troll back at them. It's just his style. The "loli community" is a niche of a niche anyway, so it's not exactly a bad business decision to throw them under the bus.
The only problem I have with guys like him and Sargon is they immediately conflate the people liking anime with cute little characters with the people whacking it to sexualized illustrations of underage girls. (while many are definitely doing that, I don't think people attacking "loli" are making that distinction) However that is the mainstream opinion. Weirdos sperging on twitter don't matter.
At least with Sargon it wasn't a big performance, he addressed it directly on an Archcast stream when asked on his position and moved on.
This is a Twitter post and so is like shouting out of your window than quietly addressing it if you are asked about it.
I've gone past that point and my issue is with people applying real life standards to fictional content. The loli stuff is like a unsupervised hot plate compared to the raging forest fire of trans/LGBT shit in society in which is more dangerous to kids.
Most of the time it's a bait and switch as they'd love the right to attack anime more thanks to its surge in popularity (thanks to how shit western entertainment is) so conflate loli to mean pedo when it is a body type, it's the context it's used in that matters. Same way daddy has different meanings to being used in a slice of life show about a family to a porn video.
'Their degeneracy'? Who are you grouping me with? Are you nothing more than a drone that focuses on a 'with us or against us' mentality like those that claim to be virtuous or are you simply labelling me because you're so focused on a small issue that is displeasing that you can't see the bigger picture of what you allow by calling for censorship?
I don't know why even half of this place is so obsessed with loli shit.
Like of course I know it's not real child porn. But I can't help feeling icky about the fact that a known hentai artist is making a "romantic comedy" series about an underage girl tormenting a boy? You can pretend all you want, but he knows exactly what he is doing.
Just look at what .win communities OP moderates. It's worse than AoV being a moderator of r/dickgirls.
.... is that a thing?
Oh, you sweet, innocent summer child 🥺
receipts
Of course he claims he just read it for the mod mail.
Point out that someone is the moderator of https://communities.win/c/lolisho, and all of a sudden they go full commie. You tried to report my post for slander, but slander requires falsehoods.
Your reaction shows your shame. You know it to be immoral degeneracy, otherwise you wouldn't care when someone points out that you are the moderator of lolisho.
Go ahead, point out that I created https://communities.win/c/jewishcontributions. See if I sperg out demanding bans for anyone who mention it. I won't because I am not ashamed of it.
It's cognitive dissonance and shame that you are feeling. You know that you masturbating to images of cartoon children is wrong. You do it anyways and attack those who condemn you for it. It is your shame.
Comment Reported for: Slander over artwork, ban the cunt
Comment Approved: Cato's attack is on me and AoV...
That is strange. I never even mentioned you.
I saw this statement as including me, because I am a moderator on .win. I read this as ".win community moderators" and literally skipped "OP".
Looking back on it, clearly you're talking about Abelist
I might be illiterate, but it's still not a rule violation to point out the forums that a user moderates. It's certainly not harassment or defamation.
Raita; Valkyria Chronicles. Satoshi Urushihara; the Langrisser and Growlanser franchises. Legendary lewd artists can still do amazing SFW material.
I'm not saying they can't do great work in another topic.
BUT!
The guy doing Nagatoro is OBVIOUSLY doing it in a way that is basically 1 step away from loli porn.
The issue isn't that the artist does hentai. But you don't just do porn, then switch to underage "rom com" that is about this little girl basically bullying a boy into submission and say it wasn't done with the exact same kind of tropes/character writing he would do for the porn.
This is my issue.
I wouldn't even have an issue with it if it was adult characters. Sure, I wouldn't care, because not my shit, but you don't do kiddie characters with the typical porn fetish type dynamics when you are known for porn, then pretend it's not a little sus.
I thought you mean takagi san, lol
Nope, definitely Nagatoro. Nanashi had QUITE the resume of hentai doujins and artworks before making Nagatoro, and had to go on quite the online cleaning spree the moment it got picked up for anime adaptation. Though didn't Nanashi also write the story, unlike those artists I mentioned earlier who were just tapped for character designs?
Because they're degenerate neckbeard pedophiles
Can you just enjoy your gross hobby and not tell us about it? Or is inflicting your degeneracy on normal people a part of your fetish?
This is where I'm at with the "loli" issue. I don't freaking care, since it doesn't harm real children, but the absolute need to go to the ends of the earth to "protect" it has annoyed me to no end. Stop bringing that shit up unless you're actively looking to have people infer you're a pedophile.
Same, it grosses normal people out.
I'm not currently in favor of anti-cartoon-childporn deathsquads... BUT I MIGHT CHANGE MY MIND IF YOU KEEP BRINGING IT UP!
The only reason it comes up more than something like feral is because feral is often legal, making so the people who hate it keep to themselves.
Fights occur over lolisho because it's often banned federally and many sites refuse to host it in countries where it's legal, causing arguments about the shit to FREQUENTLY flare up.
If it was legal then people would shut up about it because it's not child porn.
Still degenerate as fuck, people would still care. Degenerate sexual fetishes are always a gateway, not a fixed point.
Only retards care about gateway theory.
No they can't. They get butt blasted when someone says it's disgusting
...he's going to be found out to have done something with REAL kids isn't he?
You can be anti loli or enjoy the fictional content, it's the PERFORMANCE that has my 'he's done some bad shit' senses tingling. It's like trying to quickly help you parents out of the blue because you just broke something. The big display you're doing is a red flag as most people just don't consume that media because they don't like it.
“Arachnophobic? You must secretly want to fuck spiders!”
That really doesn't make any sense to the current argument, is this one of those twitter 'dunk' lines that gets used when under examination is as hollow as a reality star's head?
It makes perfect sense. You’re just too stupid to understand why.
I would not assume this "came out of nowhere." Ethan is always surrounded by drama and trolls and this tweet is probably a troll back at them. It's just his style. The "loli community" is a niche of a niche anyway, so it's not exactly a bad business decision to throw them under the bus.
The only problem I have with guys like him and Sargon is they immediately conflate the people liking anime with cute little characters with the people whacking it to sexualized illustrations of underage girls. (while many are definitely doing that, I don't think people attacking "loli" are making that distinction) However that is the mainstream opinion. Weirdos sperging on twitter don't matter.
At least with Sargon it wasn't a big performance, he addressed it directly on an Archcast stream when asked on his position and moved on.
This is a Twitter post and so is like shouting out of your window than quietly addressing it if you are asked about it.
I've gone past that point and my issue is with people applying real life standards to fictional content. The loli stuff is like a unsupervised hot plate compared to the raging forest fire of trans/LGBT shit in society in which is more dangerous to kids.
Most of the time it's a bait and switch as they'd love the right to attack anime more thanks to its surge in popularity (thanks to how shit western entertainment is) so conflate loli to mean pedo when it is a body type, it's the context it's used in that matters. Same way daddy has different meanings to being used in a slice of life show about a family to a porn video.
You sound like a faggot
Have you been spending a lot of time with them that you can tell or are you hoping as no matter what, you ain't my type.
No you literally sound like a faggot because this is always their line about anyone that speaks out against their degeneracy.
'Their degeneracy'? Who are you grouping me with? Are you nothing more than a drone that focuses on a 'with us or against us' mentality like those that claim to be virtuous or are you simply labelling me because you're so focused on a small issue that is displeasing that you can't see the bigger picture of what you allow by calling for censorship?
Here we go again.
"They're drawings"
"Drawings of what?"
Comment Reported for: False pedophilia allegations as an excuse to promote violence.
Comment Removed:
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - You can't respond back and tell them to kill themselves, because now both comment and reply violate Rule 2.