What really got me curious is why are these people being all realistic in the NYT comment section.
I mean, you simply do not see these comments on Twitter or in any other open forum.
Is it because it's closed behind a paywall and the subscribers are 99% liberal? I don't know, I guess I've gotten so used to seeing these people deny reality that it just seems like I'm watching a wrestler break character or something.
I don't know... I hope these comments are legit, but at this point I find it hard to believe that so many people would suddenly get some sense in their heads.
But if they are, then the beaner express nonstop from Texas to NYC might be the way to swing the next election (if winning elections even makes a difference at this point).
More and more people are being priced out of the circuses as they struggle to pay for bread. This can trigger preference cascades, but none of it ultimately matters. The demographic time bomb was set over 50 years ago. The country has already been remade. We could shut down all immigration and deport all illegals right this moment and it still wouldn’t save the nation.
The way forward for heritage America is brutal, unflinching nepotism and unapologetic tribal solidarity. Be really Jewish, basically.
How the fuck is anyone still falling for the climate change meme? I was told in the early 2000s that kids being born at the time would never see snow in their lifetimes.
So many dem voters list climate change as the reason they could *never *vote republican, even in cases like this where the catastrophic failure of leftist policy is undeniable.
IMHO the right has got to attack the climate alarmism of the left as a top priority. Not climate change itself per se, but specifically the irrational fear that it is some kind of 'existential threat'. That claim, which the left has somehow managed to inculcate in an entire generation, has no scientific basis. It is easily attacked and disproved, and doing so will allow many (d) voters who can see the failure of leftist policy but have voted single issue on climate change to vote more rationally.
Because they just rename it and the people who nod along to whatever don't ever make the connection. If they do, they take the name change as "proof we understand it better now."
Back then it was global warming, so when people started to see record snow they had to just generalize it to "climate change." Something that just happens all on its fucking own naturally, that they can now use as proof.
Eh, the solution is separation and parallel institutions/economies. Lean heavily into states’ rights and reject federal edicts. The deep state probably doesn’t want a hot civil war.
That is fine and all but these NYT readers infuriatingly refuse to vote against the Dems when it comes time for any actual elections.
It's like Stockholm syndrome, but more retarded.
NYT readers don't elect anyone. The black people slaving in the pits to fabricate votes do. Blacks built Weimerica.
Republicans don't fix immigration either, though. I wonder if they realize that turning Dem voters against immigration gives them fewer excuses.
That's because they would be biting the hand that feeds them.
What really got me curious is why are these people being all realistic in the NYT comment section.
I mean, you simply do not see these comments on Twitter or in any other open forum.
Is it because it's closed behind a paywall and the subscribers are 99% liberal? I don't know, I guess I've gotten so used to seeing these people deny reality that it just seems like I'm watching a wrestler break character or something.
I don't know... I hope these comments are legit, but at this point I find it hard to believe that so many people would suddenly get some sense in their heads.
But if they are, then the beaner express nonstop from Texas to NYC might be the way to swing the next election (if winning elections even makes a difference at this point).
Surprised they even have a comment section.
I believe it's limited to subscribers, so that does it's own filtering. Anyone who would drop red pills isn't paying for a subscription to the NYT.
More and more people are being priced out of the circuses as they struggle to pay for bread. This can trigger preference cascades, but none of it ultimately matters. The demographic time bomb was set over 50 years ago. The country has already been remade. We could shut down all immigration and deport all illegals right this moment and it still wouldn’t save the nation.
The way forward for heritage America is brutal, unflinching nepotism and unapologetic tribal solidarity. Be really Jewish, basically.
Nope, close the border and kick these people out.
Biden: no
at this point we can't control fed agencies until 2025. Governors can't deport. All they can do is dump illegals on the libs.
Abbot needs to send this to DC.
How the fuck is anyone still falling for the climate change meme? I was told in the early 2000s that kids being born at the time would never see snow in their lifetimes.
So many dem voters list climate change as the reason they could *never *vote republican, even in cases like this where the catastrophic failure of leftist policy is undeniable.
IMHO the right has got to attack the climate alarmism of the left as a top priority. Not climate change itself per se, but specifically the irrational fear that it is some kind of 'existential threat'. That claim, which the left has somehow managed to inculcate in an entire generation, has no scientific basis. It is easily attacked and disproved, and doing so will allow many (d) voters who can see the failure of leftist policy but have voted single issue on climate change to vote more rationally.
Because they just rename it and the people who nod along to whatever don't ever make the connection. If they do, they take the name change as "proof we understand it better now."
Back then it was global warming, so when people started to see record snow they had to just generalize it to "climate change." Something that just happens all on its fucking own naturally, that they can now use as proof.
Newspeak, is legit.
They lack the words to describe the ideas correctly so they are stuck within the paradigm of "gentrification" which is something that white people do.
No one is coming to save you. The only solution at this point is grassroots upheaval, the likes of which would turn this whole country on its head.
Eh, the solution is separation and parallel institutions/economies. Lean heavily into states’ rights and reject federal edicts. The deep state probably doesn’t want a hot civil war.
Why should I have to give up my country?
I would be more optimistic for the future if your headline were literal instead of figurative.
Archive: https://archive.is/qEBcN
If only we had fair elections so these failed policies actually mattered....