Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

24
()
posted 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 +24 / -0
27 comments share
27 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (27)
sorted by:
▲ 20 ▼
– current_horror 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

Unmarried, age 25-45, 100k salary, 6ft, not obese: less than 0.5%

What do you think the top 0.5% of women between the ages of 25 and 45 look like? Do you think they are fat? Or single moms?

If you’re in that top 0.5% of men, your appropriate mate is basically a 20-25 year old 9/10 with no kids.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 27 ▼
– current_horror 27 points 3 years ago +27 / -0

The survey doesn’t take into account mental illness, so you’re probably not top 0.5%.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– ghostfox1_ 22 points 3 years ago +22 / -0

He's also still in the closet, so that's another issue. The way he and antonio go at it...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– SarcasticRidley 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

I'm not sure which one is the bigger faggot at this point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– ghostfox1_ 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Definitely theimp. Antonio at least admits he's into dudes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

0.05% then

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– SR388-SAX 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Funny, because you seem to care a lot about imaginary internet points.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– tappydans 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

You’re short though

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Adamrises 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Its amazing how just the height one alone can jump the percentage available by large margins by just a single inch of difference. And yet its probably the first filter women use to discount the majority of men out.

Fortunate as it has been for all our manlet bros through history that women can't do math or spatial awareness, and thereby think 5'11 is 6'2 if you tell em.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Anyone who has ever seen a woman parallel park should know we have no concept of space. You say it is so, I believe it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– RaceCreatesCulture 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

There was a study conducted on I believe the dating app Hinge where people can filter by height if they bought premium. It basically proved how insane women were. The height in men the LEAST filtered by women was 6'7". Meaning if you were 6'7", you would appear on the most women's profiles because the least amount of women will have filtered you based on height. If you were under 5'10" only 16% of women will see you because 84% of women filtered men shorter than 5'10". The sweet spot for height was basically 6'0"-6'11" and within this range, the least filtered range was 6'2"-6'9" or 6'4"-6'7" (with 6'7" being the least filtered). Most women filtered out <6' and >6'11". Lastly, more women would rather date a 7' man than a 5'11" man.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Adamrises 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

I do think part of that is the aforementioned lack of spatial understanding they have. They truly cannot tell the difference between 5'10 and 6'2 unless those two guys are standing next to each other, because women being as short as they are are always looking up at them.

So their mind lazily just plugs in "6' is the big number" instead of having to do the basic math of how tall a 5'9 dude is to their own 5'2.

Your data only confirms that, because if they actually met a 6'7 dude they would absolutely filter him out. Over like 6'4-6'5 you start getting into the "actually detrimental" heights with real drawbacks due to the world not being scaled for that size, not to mention that their size makes building mass incredibly hard leading to that gangly build most have. Women are simply assuming "its big number!" and calling it a good thing, without any reality or thoughts put into it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– CarmenOfSandiego 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

They truly cannot tell the difference between 5'10 and 6'2

If you want a really fun game of shitposting see what happens when it gets displayed as 5' 13" or more. Most people zone in on the 5 and don't engage any cognitive power to realise what is going on.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– current_horror 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I used to run with a basketball crowd when I was younger. You really couldn’t be more wrong. Dudes up to 6’10” pulled girls effortlessly. It only started to fall off when you hit the 7ft range because most of those dudes were ugly from growth disorders.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Adamrises 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I know quite a few dudes in the 6'5-6'7 range, and all of them are incredibly awkward in motion due to their size. Not to mention watching them try to fit in tables and cars. So your examples don't disprove what I said. Its easy to find something hot looking at it, until reality of living with it sets in. The same way bitches love muscly ripped guys, until they are having to live with an extreme diet and have him at the gym constantly.

Also, your sample size is athletes. Who can pull women regardless of any other factor about them. Even the guys who are painfully ugly or short can pull better than most of us with that as their claim to fame. Not to mention, being athletes, they are probably way more trained and suited to make their size work for them compared to the average guy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– RaceCreatesCulture 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

I'm a 34yo guy so I put in the numbers for my height, race, income, etc...

For ages 27-40 year old, I represent 0.26% of the men in this category.

I used my requirements in women for the calculator and apparently 30.4% of women between the ages of 18-29 years old meet my standards.

And people wonder why things are so fucked...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– dzonatan 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

35 y.o Single White 6ft 1' fat 30k annual (£25k because I like my UK) Hopeless MMO junkie

5.5% chance if someone aims for me.

3/5 Aspiring Cat Lady.

My self esteem just got better =)

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 17 ▼
– ailurus 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

In this day and age, you don't run an adblocker? Seriously?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– NoEyesNoGroin 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

The internet has ads?!?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Vivs3rdSock 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Everybody has Aids! Every webpage has ads Aids!

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy