Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

32
Feminists outraged as ideology they supported turns against them (archive.ph)
posted 3 years ago by SparkMandrill83 3 years ago by SparkMandrill83 +32 / -0
45 comments share
45 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (45)
sorted by:
▲ 31 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 [S] 31 points 3 years ago +31 / -0

Defending female spaces from trannies = defending feminism. Stop being a conservative cuck, let women face the consequences of their actions for once.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Women didn't invent liberalism, though.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 [S] 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

This isnt liberalism, communist faggot.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

What is it then?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 [S] 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Gee, what ideology makes martyrs of the underpriveleged to the point of fetishization? The one that espouses free for all competition or the one that demands equality at gunpoint?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

You still didn't name it...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 [S] 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Marxism

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

So....you support Marxism then?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 5 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Women never had spaces before feminism.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 31 ▼
– Ahaus667 31 points 3 years ago +31 / -0

That’s hilariously untrue. Female small business owners have been a known staple of barter economics since antiquity, female meritocracy in “male spaces” also existed long before suffragettes. Women had separate spaces from men before feminism and then demanded all spaces after.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

The landlords wife in Chinese is called the Bosswife because she is stereotypically demanding. kung Fu hustle had a big joke about that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

I meant bathrooms, baths, and things like that always segregated by sex (yes, that was irony), but this applies equally well.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

I'm fine with going back to that given their determination to destroy men's spaces.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I'm shocked that there is no dissent there.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 20 ▼
– Tourgen 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

ruin all female spaces. this is the natural progression of "progress": the progressive agenda. Women cannot escape this. There will be no such thing as women, men, adults, children, farm animals, humans. All will be made equal.

Now, the reality of so-called "women" getting harassed and raped in their "spaces" is just complaining and any that does happen is just the justified cost of equality for all. A few corrective-action rapings will get so-called "women" in line.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

All will be made equal.

"Believe me, Sir, those who seek to level never equalize."
- Edmund Burke

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– dnile1000bc 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

Feminism as a school of thought and religion is bankrupt and corrupt. It is narcissitic, deceitful and seeks to benefit oneself at the expense of others.

Yet, it is accepted as sane and normal by both conservatives and liberals alike. We should do as little as possible to save the beneficiaries of feminism from the negative consequence of it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– realerfunction 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

"oh no, the monster i created is coming after ME now!"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– youtube_admin 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Because the world can’t just appreciate women without also acknowledging men.

This made my day. May feminists continue to be treated the way they have treated others. It is glorious.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Its comments like that that made me post this. Their seething is delicious

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 19 ▼
– deleted 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

I remember that you made this argument before. When I asked what you have achieved, the answer was that you have achieved a lot, because you have a job.

When you were asked if no women ever had a job, you replied that no woman ever deserved her job, and that therefore no woman ever achieved anything.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– Kienan 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

I remember that you made this argument before. When I asked what you have achieved, the answer was that you have achieved a lot, because you have a job.

That's shifting the goal posts, though. I don't think the claim was ever that Imp deserves a museum (would be funny though, and I fully support!), or even that men deserve a museum. Just that women don't. Whether or not the person making that argument deserves a museum is a moot point. Although Imp also answered very poorly, sounds like.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

I deserve a museum for my list posts.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

I don't think the claim was ever that Imp deserves a museum (would be funny though, and I fully support!),

As do I.

Just that women don't

Obviously, they don't. I'm addressing the claim that "they've achieved nothing", which informed by his previous statements means that no woman has ever achieved anything.

Although Imp also answered very poorly, sounds like.

He did as well as you could expect in this situation. He at least made a reasonable argument. In another thread, he said that no woman has ever achieved anything because they all "stole" their jobs form men.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Raos044 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

"The museum for men" exists in Japan actually. It's a porn shop lol.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– OldBullLee 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

But Hedy Lamar invented WiFi!!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

The difference between personal achievements and the kind that go in a museum is huge.

Agreed, but your earlier claim was that no woman ever had any personal achievements either, while you do because you have a job.

Insofar as women have made museum kinds of contributions, you definitely don't need a special museum for it.

I wouldn't say that they can say they earned their jobs considering these factors.

You said that no woman earned her job. Does that mean that in a meritocratic world, zero women would have a job?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

But even accepting all your premises, which is that every single woman in the world has a higher position than she otherwise would due to preferential treatment, they'd still have a job, and according to you, simply holding a job is sufficient to say that you have 'achievements'. So it's not that they hold a job when they otherwise would not, but for preferential treatment. If having a job is an accomplishment, most would have one even in lieu of the current situation.

Anyway, following your logic means that no Color of People can ever have any accomplishments, because affirmative action exists.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 15 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

Women work? Imp in hysteric rage, because how daaaare they take the jerbs of men.
Women don't work? Imp in hysteric rage, because women are stealing his supposed hoarded gold.
Women in prestige jobs? Imp in hysteric rage, because affirmative action.
Women in "low-tier" jobs? Imp in hysteric rage, because women are useless and fuck that, they do nothing.
Women do the woman-specific job and become hoes/porn actresses, Imp in hysteric rage, because women prey on poor poor men.
Women as housewives, Imp in hysteric rage, because they are shitting out spawns and breeding is evil, we should all die out because then he feels he totally won or some shit.

There is literally no way to not make you chimp out, mate.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 8 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

I wouldn't say being a waitress or one of those really low-tier jobs is an achievement, and that's where they'd end up.

A while back, you said that you holding a job at all is an achievement though...

The majority of affirmative action beneficiaries are white women.

Leftist talking point. But it doesn't even matter, because there are more white women than blacks. If women have no achievements because of affirmative action, then the same holds true for groups you don't want to criticize.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy