Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

32
Feminists outraged as ideology they supported turns against them (archive.ph)
posted 3 years ago by SparkMandrill83 3 years ago by SparkMandrill83 +32 / -0
45 comments share
45 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
▲ 7 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

The difference between personal achievements and the kind that go in a museum is huge.

Agreed, but your earlier claim was that no woman ever had any personal achievements either, while you do because you have a job.

Insofar as women have made museum kinds of contributions, you definitely don't need a special museum for it.

I wouldn't say that they can say they earned their jobs considering these factors.

You said that no woman earned her job. Does that mean that in a meritocratic world, zero women would have a job?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

But even accepting all your premises, which is that every single woman in the world has a higher position than she otherwise would due to preferential treatment, they'd still have a job, and according to you, simply holding a job is sufficient to say that you have 'achievements'. So it's not that they hold a job when they otherwise would not, but for preferential treatment. If having a job is an accomplishment, most would have one even in lieu of the current situation.

Anyway, following your logic means that no Color of People can ever have any accomplishments, because affirmative action exists.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 15 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

Women work? Imp in hysteric rage, because how daaaare they take the jerbs of men.
Women don't work? Imp in hysteric rage, because women are stealing his supposed hoarded gold.
Women in prestige jobs? Imp in hysteric rage, because affirmative action.
Women in "low-tier" jobs? Imp in hysteric rage, because women are useless and fuck that, they do nothing.
Women do the woman-specific job and become hoes/porn actresses, Imp in hysteric rage, because women prey on poor poor men.
Women as housewives, Imp in hysteric rage, because they are shitting out spawns and breeding is evil, we should all die out because then he feels he totally won or some shit.

There is literally no way to not make you chimp out, mate.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 8 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

I wouldn't say being a waitress or one of those really low-tier jobs is an achievement, and that's where they'd end up.

A while back, you said that you holding a job at all is an achievement though...

The majority of affirmative action beneficiaries are white women.

Leftist talking point. But it doesn't even matter, because there are more white women than blacks. If women have no achievements because of affirmative action, then the same holds true for groups you don't want to criticize.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy