As I said, a women's museum should be filled with quotes of how women believe men should be treated. Then they should take school kids there to learn from an early age.
No...it's more complicated than that and I don't know how to draw a chart on here.
Let's assume that a company has four levels of employees.
Staff > Managers > Directors > CEO
Because of the aforementioned biases, women mostly end up in the middle two levels, despite not being deserving of those roles. Companies can also promote women to the top level, typically after a woman-led rape scandal that's as fake as women's loyalty.
In a meritocracy, women would fall down the ranks and nearly entirely occupy the lowest level.
But even accepting all your premises, which is that every single woman in the world has a higher position than she otherwise would due to preferential treatment, they'd still have a job, and according to you, simply holding a job is sufficient to say that you have 'achievements'. So it's not that they hold a job when they otherwise would not, but for preferential treatment. If having a job is an accomplishment, most would have one even in lieu of the current situation.
Anyway, following your logic means that no Color of People can ever have any accomplishments, because affirmative action exists.
Women work? Imp in hysteric rage, because how daaaare they take the jerbs of men.
Women don't work? Imp in hysteric rage, because women are stealing his supposed hoarded gold.
Women in prestige jobs? Imp in hysteric rage, because affirmative action.
Women in "low-tier" jobs? Imp in hysteric rage, because women are useless and fuck that, they do nothing.
Women do the woman-specific job and become hoes/porn actresses, Imp in hysteric rage, because women prey on poor poor men.
Women as housewives, Imp in hysteric rage, because they are shitting out spawns and breeding is evil, we should all die out because then he feels he totally won or some shit.
There is literally no way to not make you chimp out, mate.
I wouldn't say being a waitress or one of those really low-tier jobs is an achievement, and that's where they'd end up.
A while back, you said that you holding a job at all is an achievement though...
The majority of affirmative action beneficiaries are white women.
Leftist talking point. But it doesn't even matter, because there are more white women than blacks. If women have no achievements because of affirmative action, then the same holds true for groups you don't want to criticize.
As I said, a women's museum should be filled with quotes of how women believe men should be treated. Then they should take school kids there to learn from an early age.
No...it's more complicated than that and I don't know how to draw a chart on here.
Let's assume that a company has four levels of employees.
Staff > Managers > Directors > CEO
Because of the aforementioned biases, women mostly end up in the middle two levels, despite not being deserving of those roles. Companies can also promote women to the top level, typically after a woman-led rape scandal that's as fake as women's loyalty.
In a meritocracy, women would fall down the ranks and nearly entirely occupy the lowest level.
But even accepting all your premises, which is that every single woman in the world has a higher position than she otherwise would due to preferential treatment, they'd still have a job, and according to you, simply holding a job is sufficient to say that you have 'achievements'. So it's not that they hold a job when they otherwise would not, but for preferential treatment. If having a job is an accomplishment, most would have one even in lieu of the current situation.
Anyway, following your logic means that no Color of People can ever have any accomplishments, because affirmative action exists.
I wouldn't say being a waitress or one of those really low-tier jobs is an achievement, and that's where they'd end up.
The majority of affirmative action beneficiaries are white women.
Women work? Imp in hysteric rage, because how daaaare they take the jerbs of men.
Women don't work? Imp in hysteric rage, because women are stealing his supposed hoarded gold.
Women in prestige jobs? Imp in hysteric rage, because affirmative action.
Women in "low-tier" jobs? Imp in hysteric rage, because women are useless and fuck that, they do nothing.
Women do the woman-specific job and become hoes/porn actresses, Imp in hysteric rage, because women prey on poor poor men.
Women as housewives, Imp in hysteric rage, because they are shitting out spawns and breeding is evil, we should all die out because then he feels he totally won or some shit.
There is literally no way to not make you chimp out, mate.
So, exactly like women react?
Men work? That's bad because "patriarchy"
Men don't work? That's bad because "lazy"
Men in prestige jobs? That's just because "they're privileged"
Men in shitty jobs? "No ambition"
Men do male-dominated jobs? "We need more women in that field"
Men do woman-dominated jobs? "We don't want groomer males in teaching"
Men provide? "I deserve alimony for sacrificing my career"
Men don't provide? "The guy's a deadbeat"
A while back, you said that you holding a job at all is an achievement though...
Leftist talking point. But it doesn't even matter, because there are more white women than blacks. If women have no achievements because of affirmative action, then the same holds true for groups you don't want to criticize.