Report: Amazon Studios Scrapped Ranking Shows Based On Audience Scores Because It Revealed "Audiences Found Queer Stories Off-Pu...
A new report claims that Amazon Studios scrapped an audience ranking system after data revealed audiences were put off by "queer stories" and themes.
Equity in reviews. Giving the audience the freedom to evaluate your content generates disproportionate negative reviews for certain categories of product. So in the name of equity, we scrapped your ability to evaluate our content.
Equity is anti-freedom.
Netflix did the same thing with their star rankings way back when. Funded a comedy special for some female "comedian" that people gave low ratings, so in response they got rid of the star ratings.
Amy Schumer
This "comedian" simply doesn't cut it for her. There nerds to be more " around comedian for her. Absolutely no jokes aside from muh vagina as well as being quite a bitch.
More " or more ()?
Chuck Schumer's fat pig of a niece isn't funnny, and never was.
Wait, there's someone worse than Amy Schumer?
yes
It's anti-truth. We are basically fully in a situation where if you can call something racist, sexist, or anti-LGBT+ (which to them means anything not explicitly pro-minority, pro-woman, pro-LGBT+) then you can suppress that information in broad daylight. This goes for science, news, and anything else. And, very few people really give a shit.
Or ... or, and hear me out multinational corporation, if you know people don't like that stuff, maybe fuckin' take that out of the shows you produce.
And then, I know this sounds crazy, but if you give people what they want, they'll happily pay you for more of it.
Perhaps give that idea a try.
They believe, correctly even, that if you force something in media long enough people will get used to it and just accept it. Look at things like sex, drugs, blacks, and all other immorality that would be verboten in media just a generation ago that we just shrug as normal.
The gay thing is just taking longer than normal, but they have every reason to believe it will work because we all let it work before.
During Covid, I started watching reruns of the Andy Griffith show, and you can see the propaganda at work.
A woman runs for a city council seat and wins despite many of the men thinking it's an absurd idea.
An episode where Aunt Bee "proves" that men gossip just as much as women.
A controlling father won't allow his daughter to wear dresses and makeup.
And yet by the 80s the "dumb dad" had taken ahold of society so deep that people actually began to think women were smarter, even while laughing at it being a joke.
Heck just look at the effect media had on convincing hundreds of millions of men that women don't like or want sex.
Yup. TV has always been a vehicle for social programming and propaganda.
And yet, men won't push back all the way to the starting line. They have been conditioned so hard that compromise is still leagues ahead of where they started.
That feminist propaganda might fail to convince most men that danger hair fatties are the real 10/10s, but most men won't even question the idea of women getting to vote or be "independent" despite that being the same push.
I don't think its blackpilled. I think its full bluepilled, if we are keeping with that analogy. They haven't "accepted" it overtly. They are just so deep into the reality that has been crafted that they don't even consider certain things they simply take as given are not, and are in fact ill gotten gains of activists.
Because it serves us more that they are "independent" because we aren't stuck funding their worthless existence.
I know you like extinction, but some of us do not. Which means a compromise on them being allowed to live to birth our young and not allowed to do mass harm.
Same with homosexuality. Back in the 90s they started with introducing lesbian characters that were feminine and attractive.
As a kid, almost every kid I knew had parents who were married. A lot of children's movies, specifically Christmas ones, featured divorce and treated it like it was normal. They showed the dads as trying hard to be good dads, but it was still treated as okay that the mothers had divorced them because they had some flaws.
Then in most of the romantic comedies targeting young women they started off with a woman in a relationship with someone that supports them financially and tries to keep them happy, but he's not perfect. Because he made some mistakes, the narrative justifies the woman running off and fucking some fun broke guy she barely knows. A committed and stable relationship is presented as a prison, while chasing random dick is treated as freeing.
Nowadays divorce is common and often happens even when the man is doing mostly everything correctly. Countless women are getting pregnant from the fun strangers that end up as absentee fathers who can't pay child support, cucking other men through taxes when she goes on welfare to raise them.
People learn how the world works by watching others. When everyone's world experience comes from viewing immoral fiction, life begins to emulate those degenerate stories.
Exactly and, as your examples prove, women are far more susceptible to it because of their inclination to conform harder. And since men are pretty easily led by the dick to whatever women want, media just controls the women to control the men.
Who was it that said, back in the 1950s, that having a TV in the home was like having a jew in your living room.
BAN THIS SICK FILTH!!
They can't. They're committed, and will not cease promoting anti-human horror as long as they stay sufficiently in the black. They'll only stop if they're threatened with bankruptcy.
Contrary to what many lefties would tell you, queer is niche. Niche content should do well with the demographic it targets, but expecting it to have broad appeal is unrealistic.
Broad as in large or wide, not as in women, though queer content does appeal to women more than men.
It's impossible for a niche product to stay niche. Eventually whoever runs the studio (or more often takes it over) decides they want to appeal to normies and they destroy the product's original appeal. These days they add the step of calling their original customers bigots when it inevitably bombs.
100%
Goes double for the troon social contagion.
Or maybe because normal people feel a visceral revulsion when they see faggotry
our guys are running deep cover to make events like this possible
And the obvious implication when you read that is "And how can we change this?" That's the next step in their research.
They can never just leave something alone. Society is just a giant blob of clay that they can mold into whatever dildo shape they want. Their hubris is shocking when you sit and think about it.
They're ideologues, which isn't quite far from being crazy.
Can’t say I’m surprised. Most people are not gay. They may not mind a gay character here and there but when there is an agenda to jerk shoving it down your throat you shouldn’t be surprised. Similar reason why I’m very wary of any show with lgbt, black, or female leads since 2014. I won’t watch unless I have a recommendation from a trusted source
They don't seem to understand that by default normal people find homosexual antics digusting to look at especially when the actors look like they came from the circus freak show
To which they would respond:
"You don't seem to understand that WE control what you peasants define as normal."
what a shocker, nobody likes fag shit.
<youregoddamnright.gif>
When the goal of fag fascists went from toleration to total cultural acceptance, they understood what sort of resistance they would meet.
Now they're in like Flynn with the establishment, and that machine--the media/state axis of evil--is bending over to take the Big Gay Dick as an effective wedge to maintain confusion and disorder and to further demoralize normal people.
Same can be said for troons.
So I'm going to be the one to say it?
A league of their own is a 99% female cast. How does Amazon know that's not why people fucking hated it?
All their examples of why people hated gays involved women as main protagonists, something a lot of people hate far more.
Female protagonists constantly flop hard at the box office and even in other mediums.
Sounds more like they're hiding behind the rainbow flag to stand behind a bunch of likely woman-written garbage starring mostly women.
It can be both. People are definitely sick of Mary Sue/girl boss characters.
What a stunning turn of events! Imp making a thread not about women about women!
Who are you trying to fool?
Yeah, except the original movie ALSO starred a lot of women and was a big hit. Big enough for them to adapt it to a series (30 years after the fact, wait, they’re was a TV series back then, too, but it didn’t do well). So the issue might not be the women. Damn, Imp, you’re as bad as most feminists. They’ll make a shitty product and say “they hated it because of misogyny.” Then there’s an idiot like you who sees a shitty product, and rather than point everything that made it shitty (writing, acting, message over story, cheap production, etc.) you’ll go “it’s because we’re all misogynists!”
No, it's because they're all misandrists.
Seeing women in anything in 2023 is a sign that it will be a bottomless pit of hatred, an assumption constantly proven correct.
Aha! We're getting to the root cause. It's NOT because of an abundance of women. Those are only the indicator of why people really dislike these products: "a bottomless pit of hatred." We can dig deeper, and you'll respond with "yes, the root cause is that everyone involved is a misandrist." But you can't prove that one. We can say the writers sucked at writing, because they wrote something hateful and unpleasant, but it's a lot harder to get at their motivation for it. So we'll just leave it at "the writers sucked at writing."
the original league of their own was great.
the reboot was unfuckingwatchable.
Amazon Studios is a feminist bulwark. You're probably not far off.