AOC apparently caught tweeting from her burner account
(twitter.com)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
And that is why "online harrassment" always has to be called into question the moment it is invoked as an argument.
Explanation for why this was clearly AOC's burner:
AOC was literally stupid enough to name the burner account "zazasmoka" HER OWN NICKNAME + a variation of the word "burner". This would be like if Trump make a twitter account and called it "Donnietorcha".
And we all know that AOC has exactly the level of intelligence to behave this way.
100% her.
And to state the obvious: the LAST thing a person who was not AOC would have done, is delete the account. That person would have rejoiced in all the attention and new likes and follows, and been dunking 24/7 on the conservatives claiming he was AOC. It would have been the highlight of this person's life, their 15 minutes of fame, quite literally. Nobody would nuke their account in response to that - except for AOC who would be motivated to do it to try to hide her old shit talking tweets before they could be archived.
I figured she was referring to how much weed she smoked. Like I know a lot of us have an account named xxx_WEED_420_xxx somewhere.
zazasmoka accused to be AOC sock puppet
account immediately deleted
LOL yup it was her. Anime pfp LOL.
Wayback machine still has it, she said it's her in the final tweet here.
Meant to be sarcastic, but you can actually see AOC saying it. It's so hilarious. She's such an immature idiot. She's basically the token congressional Onlyfans thot & exists primarily as a thirst trap for left wing simps, of which there are many.
What I thought. It feels like her at least. And why delete the account when it ISN'T her? Looking at some of the tweets and especially retweets and it seems like it is her. What I got from this is that she seems very into Crowder else she would not be posting so much about him.
What a cesspool. I'm glad I was permabanned.
Why would someone respond to me when I mention them in a tweet? Must be a burner account!
Um, what? He was tweeting AOC and a non-AOC account responded in the 1st person- why would anyone but AOC do that?
Looks like his reply is to both AOC's main account and to zazasmoka though, as zakat highlighted.
He's saying that, in the original tweet that started it all, he responded to both AOC and "zazasmoka". Therefore, zazasmok responding to the allegations makes sense.
The question is, why was zazasmoka part of the original conversation? And why doesn't zazasmoka's tweet show up as part of the conversation in the picture of the guy making the claim?
I agree with zakat; I think the guy is pulling people's legs.
This tweeter thinks he replied to the possible burner's retweet of AOC: https://twitter.com/NNebbu/status/1642390197403893763
I just tried it out and it doesn't include the person who retweeted when you respond to a retweet.
And, like someone in the comments mentioned, even if true, it's already suspicious that they would be following that account if he was really a RWer.
Personally, something about "Joe Biden Hates Black People" just doesn't sit right with me. Seems like bait for Trump supporters.
Well this is confusing. Someone else tested it here by going to the retweeter's profile first and it apparently worked.
The next issue there is what made him go to this zaza profile in the first place that he'd see the AOC retweet and reply from there?
All I can think of is Twitter mobile, but even I wouldn't trust it.
I figure it's worth posting my evidence.
https://i.ibb.co/MStKZB6/image.png
I follow Ramzpaul and he retweeted that. It showed up on my timeline (my prev post where I tried it out was just a random person who retweeted something).
As you can see, it doesn't show Ramzpaul's handle when replying.
My whole thing is:
Niko is not a right winger nor has he ever pretended to be. He's appeared at a few Minds IRL/Better Discourse events, he's very much a lefty just not a DNC shill.
Also lots of RWers follow AOC, she's one of the most prominent Dems in the country. Following /= endorsement.
Knew it. He's using gullible people on the so-called "right" to push this lie and make y'all look stupid.
A lot of people pretend to be RW but are really just "former" liberals, just like a lot of men pretend to be women but are nothing more than men with mental illnesses.
Some people choose to believe that, a lot of us don't. And it's not like he's a journalist or news reporter where he has to follow all these people. He's a gimmick account, at best.
Also, when someone responds to one of my tweets, I immediately delete my account.
You know, to avoid being accussed of being an AOC burner account!
Total stretch on my part, but it's also possible the guy (or a friend) made the "burner" himself to set this up.
The reply was pretty clearly directed at AOC, talked about voting to send money (that's what reps do, not randos) and "standing up" to LibsofTT which is what Sandy is doing in the video not Twitter rando.
Also other evidence in this thread like why would they delete their account & Zaza is a nick name for Alexandria and smoker is a synonym for burner.
Kind of serious when the google search brings up tweets for this account but the cache looks like it's already been wiped. Someone's calling in favors. Or making threats.
Dumb whore.
What a sack of shit she is when she's able to hide behind anonymity.
nitter https://nitter.1d4.us/realnikohouse/status/1642290924469334018
Same for me, maybe an April fools day change