AOC apparently caught tweeting from her burner account
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Why would someone respond to me when I mention them in a tweet? Must be a burner account!
Um, what? He was tweeting AOC and a non-AOC account responded in the 1st person- why would anyone but AOC do that?
Looks like his reply is to both AOC's main account and to zazasmoka though, as zakat highlighted.
He's saying that, in the original tweet that started it all, he responded to both AOC and "zazasmoka". Therefore, zazasmok responding to the allegations makes sense.
The question is, why was zazasmoka part of the original conversation? And why doesn't zazasmoka's tweet show up as part of the conversation in the picture of the guy making the claim?
I agree with zakat; I think the guy is pulling people's legs.
This tweeter thinks he replied to the possible burner's retweet of AOC: https://twitter.com/NNebbu/status/1642390197403893763
I just tried it out and it doesn't include the person who retweeted when you respond to a retweet.
And, like someone in the comments mentioned, even if true, it's already suspicious that they would be following that account if he was really a RWer.
Personally, something about "Joe Biden Hates Black People" just doesn't sit right with me. Seems like bait for Trump supporters.
Also, when someone responds to one of my tweets, I immediately delete my account.
You know, to avoid being accussed of being an AOC burner account!
Total stretch on my part, but it's also possible the guy (or a friend) made the "burner" himself to set this up.
The reply was pretty clearly directed at AOC, talked about voting to send money (that's what reps do, not randos) and "standing up" to LibsofTT which is what Sandy is doing in the video not Twitter rando.
Also other evidence in this thread like why would they delete their account & Zaza is a nick name for Alexandria and smoker is a synonym for burner.