The spicy part is about 3 minutes past the time stamp. Twitter and the rest of the corporate media EXPLODED over this one.
And of course Dilbert was removed from pretty much every newspaper with an obligatory virtue signaling statement "we are against pattern recognition...etc etc"
Meh. Biggest criticism is where he frames blacks as a hate group. That's inappropriate, but I think he knows that as a "what would the ADL classify as a hate group", and then applying it. And yeah, they would absolutely say that about whites, and certainly plenty of Academicians have specified that whites are an explicitly morally inferior race, and that whites in general are guilty of the crimes of their race, which involve being the inventors of violence, theft, genocide, racism, and colonialism.
Arch and I have had many long winded arguments about White Flight, and I've never seen anything wrong with it. If you don't want to live with people, then you are more than welcome to leave those communities. White Flight scares the living shit out of a lot of Democratically controlled cities, because it means that their party-boss system for their cities is failing, and one of the groups with the largest income earners, is leaving.
The Democrats Party Boss System for cities revolves around balkanizing the cities into ethnic enclaves that can't integrate with each-other, can't communicate with each other, and are utterly dependent upon an ethnic party boss to represent them to the larger government. This means that entire swathes of people are giant political blocs that can be manipulated by working with only one person: the party boss. No on can challenge the party boss, no one can compete against the party boss, and no one go around them because he personally brings in the votes, and the political bloc votes for him religiously. Demographic Replacement is useful to Democrats when different groups start to lose their loyalty to their party boss, or lose their loyalty to the party boss's master, or if there is a pre-existing ethnic group that is hostile to the larger party. It's actually important not to let any one ethnic group dominate the system, because internal dissent will be inevitable, and the party boss system breaks down. So demographic control needs to be strictly managed.
But White Flight is a huge problem of uncontrolled population movement. White tax payers are typically income earners for Democratic governments in the US, and also use the least services. If whites start to leave in an uncontrolled manner, you'll see income sources dry up. That also means that the government's welfare system, that exists only to ensure political loyalty, will become totally unaffordable, which will cause an economic (and likely demographic) collapse for the entire city. As a result, they need to stigmatize white flight, and promote white paternalist/savior attitudes among the remaining whites; and they need to combat and prevent the development of more Republican leaning suburbs. Especially if those suburbs aren't paying into the city's tax revenues.
I see no problem with this. Democratic cities don't deserve to be funded or supported anyway. Just like I suggest pulling your money out of the banks and into assets, I say you should feel free to leave shithole communities in these hive cities.
Scott has a knack for deadpan delivery, but unfortunately literal-minded normies and autists are reinforced when they take effective sarcasm at face value. The world would be a much better place if karma was persistent.
On a second listening, what Scott said has a very different context when quote-mined down to "get the hell away from black people". The full clip is Sowell type 1B discrimination while the legacy media headlines look like the racist racist uncle spouting type 2 discrimination. If I listened to The Lotus Eaters correctly, Scott was saying get the hell away from black people because affirmative action gives PoC an unfair advantage in the workplace, not to have a clinical phobia of them.
Looking past normies; leftists and other aggressively conventional-minded types do not care for statements-of-fact or even how statements will be interpreted, but how statements should be interpreted. The literal minded, outside that detestable quadrant, lap up their bullshit and society conflates their naivety with innocence. Hence the 'sarcasm', which is Scott twisting establishment rhetoric against itself, isn't having the corrective effect on society it should.
I listened to the same lotus eaters segment, and I think Carl sums it up accurately as: "He's in favor of white flight" and "You shouldn't have to live near racists".
I don't disagree with either statement, and frankly, neither did Malcolm X. I'll add his quote in a separate reply later.
race mixer ya boi zack jumps in and call adams racist, can't accept people don't want to live close to niggers, not even niggers themselves want to live amongst niggers
I wonder if he's overcompensating for being called out as a big Pharma stooge and then trying to change over to the "because I'm scary smart I knew the vax was poison all along -- even though I took four jabs of the stuff" side of the fence.
Okay, so he's referring to the dindu portion of every race. Do you think that there aren't shitty men who can't be redeemed?
If so, I highly encourage you to spend time in inner cities, like Philadelphia, Baltimore, etc. Please, show how it's all womens fault and men are never to blame for anything.
Please, show how it's all womens fault and men are never to blame for anything.
I mean, there is a pretty consistent theme among all those men of a horrible single mom who raised them in a manner that made them irredeemable before they were legal. From both serial killers, to ghetto trash, to trailer park psychos, they usually have god awful mothers behind them.
Like, adults are responsible for their own choices. But when you got a rap sheet, a gang connection, and a violent temperament by middle school you really can place the blame back on their mothers.
Most middle eastern terrorism is because the women are just as fervent about indoctrination as any of the men and they're the ones responsible for instilling it into children. However nobody ever wants then to take responsibility.
That said yeah these fuckers are adults and they make their choices. I was raised in an extremely impoverished condition with mostly shitty conditions and I don't even have so much as a speeding ticket and now I'm a lawyer
The spicy part is about 3 minutes past the time stamp. Twitter and the rest of the corporate media EXPLODED over this one.
And of course Dilbert was removed from pretty much every newspaper with an obligatory virtue signaling statement "we are against pattern recognition...etc etc"
must've been liberating for him realizing he'll probably die from the clot soon so might as well say what's on his mind and not give a shit anymore
He probably has fuck you money at this point.
Meh. Biggest criticism is where he frames blacks as a hate group. That's inappropriate, but I think he knows that as a "what would the ADL classify as a hate group", and then applying it. And yeah, they would absolutely say that about whites, and certainly plenty of Academicians have specified that whites are an explicitly morally inferior race, and that whites in general are guilty of the crimes of their race, which involve being the inventors of violence, theft, genocide, racism, and colonialism.
Fundamentally, what he's saying is that he doesn't want to be around racists. I don't blame him for that. I think that at a base point, he's espousing White Flight, which scares the shit out of the Left.
Arch and I have had many long winded arguments about White Flight, and I've never seen anything wrong with it. If you don't want to live with people, then you are more than welcome to leave those communities. White Flight scares the living shit out of a lot of Democratically controlled cities, because it means that their party-boss system for their cities is failing, and one of the groups with the largest income earners, is leaving.
The Democrats Party Boss System for cities revolves around balkanizing the cities into ethnic enclaves that can't integrate with each-other, can't communicate with each other, and are utterly dependent upon an ethnic party boss to represent them to the larger government. This means that entire swathes of people are giant political blocs that can be manipulated by working with only one person: the party boss. No on can challenge the party boss, no one can compete against the party boss, and no one go around them because he personally brings in the votes, and the political bloc votes for him religiously. Demographic Replacement is useful to Democrats when different groups start to lose their loyalty to their party boss, or lose their loyalty to the party boss's master, or if there is a pre-existing ethnic group that is hostile to the larger party. It's actually important not to let any one ethnic group dominate the system, because internal dissent will be inevitable, and the party boss system breaks down. So demographic control needs to be strictly managed.
But White Flight is a huge problem of uncontrolled population movement. White tax payers are typically income earners for Democratic governments in the US, and also use the least services. If whites start to leave in an uncontrolled manner, you'll see income sources dry up. That also means that the government's welfare system, that exists only to ensure political loyalty, will become totally unaffordable, which will cause an economic (and likely demographic) collapse for the entire city. As a result, they need to stigmatize white flight, and promote white paternalist/savior attitudes among the remaining whites; and they need to combat and prevent the development of more Republican leaning suburbs. Especially if those suburbs aren't paying into the city's tax revenues.
I see no problem with this. Democratic cities don't deserve to be funded or supported anyway. Just like I suggest pulling your money out of the banks and into assets, I say you should feel free to leave shithole communities in these hive cities.
Scott has a knack for deadpan delivery, but unfortunately literal-minded normies and autists are reinforced when they take effective sarcasm at face value. The world would be a much better place if karma was persistent.
What's the "joke" here?
Saying, something like, "well, if 25% of a group were racists, you'd call them a hate group" isn't exactly satirical, it's simply a statement of fact.
On a second listening, what Scott said has a very different context when quote-mined down to "get the hell away from black people". The full clip is Sowell type 1B discrimination while the legacy media headlines look like the racist racist uncle spouting type 2 discrimination. If I listened to The Lotus Eaters correctly, Scott was saying get the hell away from black people because affirmative action gives PoC an unfair advantage in the workplace, not to have a clinical phobia of them.
Looking past normies; leftists and other aggressively conventional-minded types do not care for statements-of-fact or even how statements will be interpreted, but how statements should be interpreted. The literal minded, outside that detestable quadrant, lap up their bullshit and society conflates their naivety with innocence. Hence the 'sarcasm', which is Scott twisting establishment rhetoric against itself, isn't having the corrective effect on society it should.
I listened to the same lotus eaters segment, and I think Carl sums it up accurately as: "He's in favor of white flight" and "You shouldn't have to live near racists".
I don't disagree with either statement, and frankly, neither did Malcolm X. I'll add his quote in a separate reply later.
race mixer ya boi zack jumps in and call adams racist, can't accept people don't want to live close to niggers, not even niggers themselves want to live amongst niggers
I wonder if he's overcompensating for being called out as a big Pharma stooge and then trying to change over to the "because I'm scary smart I knew the vax was poison all along -- even though I took four jabs of the stuff" side of the fence.
Fun to watch either way.
Is he really selectively capitalizing White with a minorcase black, or is it just you?
Consider the video title. "White" and "black" aren't included.
Oh no did he break AP style guidelines?
That's me. Just following the rules.
It's a video, so...
It's reasonable. White people invented letters, and capital letters. I respect $@%^ culture by not using White imperialist writing to describe them.
Adams is the definition of a midwit. Me, I enjoy the clarity I have from my comfy spot on the left hand side of the bell curve lol.
The bell curve's left hand side or your left hand side while facing the opposite direction to view the curve?
nobody ever refers to the graph from the graph's perspective
That's The Joke.
Dicks
Having watched this video above I think maybe he meant the "urban youth" lmao
Impy ignores everything that's inconvenient to his hatred of women.
Adams absolutely meant the dindu portion of the black race.
Okay, so he's referring to the dindu portion of every race. Do you think that there aren't shitty men who can't be redeemed?
If so, I highly encourage you to spend time in inner cities, like Philadelphia, Baltimore, etc. Please, show how it's all womens fault and men are never to blame for anything.
I mean, there is a pretty consistent theme among all those men of a horrible single mom who raised them in a manner that made them irredeemable before they were legal. From both serial killers, to ghetto trash, to trailer park psychos, they usually have god awful mothers behind them.
Like, adults are responsible for their own choices. But when you got a rap sheet, a gang connection, and a violent temperament by middle school you really can place the blame back on their mothers.
Most middle eastern terrorism is because the women are just as fervent about indoctrination as any of the men and they're the ones responsible for instilling it into children. However nobody ever wants then to take responsibility.
That said yeah these fuckers are adults and they make their choices. I was raised in an extremely impoverished condition with mostly shitty conditions and I don't even have so much as a speeding ticket and now I'm a lawyer
We could also encourage men to stop blaming everyone else for their problems and deal with them in a healthier way. Just throwing that out there.
You act like a woman a lot of the time tbh. Blaming everyone else for shit instead of accepting some level of personal responsibility.
That's because she is a woman.