Is this suppose to be something new? This has been my entire school experience.
This was one of the reasons I liked math, there was little bias.
On a related note, my high-school math teacher was published recently in a local newspaper talking about how is the fault of guys that girls do not do well in math competitions. The entire system works against guys so lets take the one thing guys can do on a leveled playing field with girls.
Male teachers also favour female students with higher grades, because men are hard-wired to treat women and girls differently. Even a return to gender segregation probably wouldn't completely solve it, but I'd say it would help.
On top of that, it would be better for a whole host of other reasons.
You won't make it very far into modern society without some level of reading, writing, or arithmetic. Even a complete traditional stay at home mom needs those to some extent to function.
Well, generally I'd expect her to do some amounts of shopping for her to be able to successfully be a homemaker. Because you know, most of the time the patriarch has a real job which leaves little time to do so, especially for him to afford a wife who doesn't work and numerous children.
Unless you just love women so much you want them to live the ultimate life of luxury where they literally do nothing but put in a DVD and then wait for you to return for sex.
Hunters and gatherers. Men were the hunters, women were the gatherers. Going to the grocery store fulfills that primal instinct women have.
In a safe society where you don't have to worry about rape apes, it's not a bad thing for them to do this and it's a good opportunity to socialize kids too.
If you want to go full rural off the grid living, you can. That's a completely different conversation. If you want to restructure literally all of society and the world into your perfect utopia, education is a useless part to even think about because all people would need their dad would teach them to keep the farm running.
But, some of us think about things in more concrete terms than that in hopes of something actually feasible over jerkoff fantasies.
Realistically? No idea. Ideally? Find distant relatives living in the most isolated rural setting, establish a relationship with them, and beg them to teach you and your family how to live right in exchange for money and maybe even labor if you are able to move there.
When it comes to learning a trade boys just do a lot better if it involves actually doing something. I've noticed this with a family member of mine who's recently started working. Before work he was pretty bad in school, just could not concentrate but he's not dumb, just never got used sitting down to learn. He's improved leaps and bounds learning a practical skill.
My father was functionally illiterate, like many ghetto clowns, and was still able to find great success on assemble offshore oil rigs. This despite being barely able to read any of the blueprints or manuals, but simply working off skill and knowledge gained.
A lot of guys would excel in life by being given only a fraction of the schooling we give them now, and simply allowing them to do apprenticeship trade work to learn the rest.
I don't disagree. My father was an extreme that happened to work out. I'd wager that something around just the elementary school years (1-4/5) is still necessary to baseline the populace for survival. Enough time to learn to read, write, do basic math, and get some ability to critical think.
Well yeah, its 35% Black (and much higher than that once you leave South Arkansas areas like Shreveport). So once you factor in the extreme poverty whites and Indians, like 1 in 3 people never bothered to learn.
Absolutely. If anything, the boys that learn really well from sitting down and studying end up being on the fucking spectrum because they are already pre-disposed from physically doing a lot of things, and even then, they still require physical stimuli.
Probably because the entire system is designed to favour girls, if school was more like chess boxing where you have hard physical exercise, then academics and switch between the two constantly, girls score may go low and boys would be on top.
So tdlr, schools don't work, better off having private education and focus on individual learning.
That was a well known problem 15+ years ago. Teacher's inability to deal with and/or dislike of male students was also the cause of the ADD and Autism epidemic of the millennium as well.
The majority of people with either of those diagnosis have nothing of the sort, they were just normal boys who teachers wanted medicated into complacency or became damaged by the label/medication they were forced under until they were that way.
Yes, this is nothing new. Many years back, when I was a high school senior, a girl and I both applied for the same scholarship. I had slightly better grades and way better extracurriculars but she got the scholarship.
The people deciding never met us, this information and a short personal statement were all they had to go on. But I have a masculine name and that girl did not.
That was my first taste of the pervasive gynocentrism in our society. For a long time I still thought if you were the best at your work you would still be recognized and advanced, but a lifetime of watching mediocre women and minorities promoted past their more capable white male peers have disabused me of that fantasy.
Hell high-school? College is the same. My class marshal in college had literally the exact same accolades and GPA as me yet I didn't get the award we both got nominated for but she and 4 other girls with worse resumes did and the admin didn't even bother telling me I didn't get it either.
Is this suppose to be something new? This has been my entire school experience. This was one of the reasons I liked math, there was little bias.
On a related note, my high-school math teacher was published recently in a local newspaper talking about how is the fault of guys that girls do not do well in math competitions. The entire system works against guys so lets take the one thing guys can do on a leveled playing field with girls.
This was my experience at school too.
Everybody says there are too many men in science - maybe because the women bullied them out of every other subject?
Women have a massive in group preference. There is no male in group preference.
We need to return to gender segregated education. It would be best for girls and boys.
Women teachers would still be able to psychologically abuse girls, brainwash them to hate men, etc. Better to just get women out of teaching.
Male teachers also favour female students with higher grades, because men are hard-wired to treat women and girls differently. Even a return to gender segregation probably wouldn't completely solve it, but I'd say it would help.
On top of that, it would be better for a whole host of other reasons.
My high school gym teacher was one such example. Always gave girls higher grades for lesser results.
why do girls need to go to school?
You won't make it very far into modern society without some level of reading, writing, or arithmetic. Even a complete traditional stay at home mom needs those to some extent to function.
She doesnt need to "make it" farther than her husband's house.
If you want illiterate sons, making sure that their first teacher is functionally illiterate is a great way to accomplish that.
Well, generally I'd expect her to do some amounts of shopping for her to be able to successfully be a homemaker. Because you know, most of the time the patriarch has a real job which leaves little time to do so, especially for him to afford a wife who doesn't work and numerous children.
Unless you just love women so much you want them to live the ultimate life of luxury where they literally do nothing but put in a DVD and then wait for you to return for sex.
women shopping is gay modernity
the husband brings home resources, the wife makes the best she can out of them
and they work together to balance their needs, wants, and ability to provide
Hunters and gatherers. Men were the hunters, women were the gatherers. Going to the grocery store fulfills that primal instinct women have.
In a safe society where you don't have to worry about rape apes, it's not a bad thing for them to do this and it's a good opportunity to socialize kids too.
Yes, I said "modern society" from the start.
If you want to go full rural off the grid living, you can. That's a completely different conversation. If you want to restructure literally all of society and the world into your perfect utopia, education is a useless part to even think about because all people would need their dad would teach them to keep the farm running.
But, some of us think about things in more concrete terms than that in hopes of something actually feasible over jerkoff fantasies.
Home economics is way more than baking brownies. Teach girls some basic chemistry so they can make home made laundry detergent.
Her mother and grandmother and other female family members can teach her that.
How, when they're 3-4 generations removed from self-reliance, do they rediscover it?
Realistically? No idea. Ideally? Find distant relatives living in the most isolated rural setting, establish a relationship with them, and beg them to teach you and your family how to live right in exchange for money and maybe even labor if you are able to move there.
I don't even believe that.
Honestly, I think girls absolutely do better in a very structured, quiet, and directed learning environment.
Teaching boys to sit still is the first lesson.
Hence, why the system inevitably favors girls.
When it comes to learning a trade boys just do a lot better if it involves actually doing something. I've noticed this with a family member of mine who's recently started working. Before work he was pretty bad in school, just could not concentrate but he's not dumb, just never got used sitting down to learn. He's improved leaps and bounds learning a practical skill.
My father was functionally illiterate, like many ghetto clowns, and was still able to find great success on assemble offshore oil rigs. This despite being barely able to read any of the blueprints or manuals, but simply working off skill and knowledge gained.
A lot of guys would excel in life by being given only a fraction of the schooling we give them now, and simply allowing them to do apprenticeship trade work to learn the rest.
Idk I believe in literacy at a minimum.
I don't disagree. My father was an extreme that happened to work out. I'd wager that something around just the elementary school years (1-4/5) is still necessary to baseline the populace for survival. Enough time to learn to read, write, do basic math, and get some ability to critical think.
Eh most of Louisiana is illiterate based on my interactions with them
Well yeah, its 35% Black (and much higher than that once you leave South Arkansas areas like Shreveport). So once you factor in the extreme poverty whites and Indians, like 1 in 3 people never bothered to learn.
Absolutely. If anything, the boys that learn really well from sitting down and studying end up being on the fucking spectrum because they are already pre-disposed from physically doing a lot of things, and even then, they still require physical stimuli.
"Ghetto Clowns on the Oil Rig" sounds like an amazing adventure novel.
Probably because the entire system is designed to favour girls, if school was more like chess boxing where you have hard physical exercise, then academics and switch between the two constantly, girls score may go low and boys would be on top.
So tdlr, schools don't work, better off having private education and focus on individual learning.
That's not a bug, it's a feature.
That was a well known problem 15+ years ago. Teacher's inability to deal with and/or dislike of male students was also the cause of the ADD and Autism epidemic of the millennium as well.
The majority of people with either of those diagnosis have nothing of the sort, they were just normal boys who teachers wanted medicated into complacency or became damaged by the label/medication they were forced under until they were that way.
The entire feminist system is designed to only produce only two types of men: illiterate thugs and effeminate bookworms.
Yes, this is nothing new. Many years back, when I was a high school senior, a girl and I both applied for the same scholarship. I had slightly better grades and way better extracurriculars but she got the scholarship.
The people deciding never met us, this information and a short personal statement were all they had to go on. But I have a masculine name and that girl did not.
That was my first taste of the pervasive gynocentrism in our society. For a long time I still thought if you were the best at your work you would still be recognized and advanced, but a lifetime of watching mediocre women and minorities promoted past their more capable white male peers have disabused me of that fantasy.
Hell high-school? College is the same. My class marshal in college had literally the exact same accolades and GPA as me yet I didn't get the award we both got nominated for but she and 4 other girls with worse resumes did and the admin didn't even bother telling me I didn't get it either.
Women live life on I’m Too Young To Die difficulty exhibit number ten million.
No shit