Parody site that brilliantly illustrates a very real phenomenon: whenever a woman makes a bad decision, it's because she was too young and an evil man manipulated her, even if she's well into adulthood.
These people would happily claim a woman in her 20s is too young to know any better if it furthers the narrative of men bad and/or allows them to participate in a Two Minutes Hate.
I am gay. The Gay Community has a grooming problem. This is painful to admit because we were all demonized as pedos for so long, but where there is smoke, there is fire. Just like the Catholic Church, there are several bad ones, but there are a lot more good ones, and those who aren't in on the pedo bullshit are trying to protect the reputation of the whole by hiding the pedos. No, you cast out the pedophiles and you cast out their enablers!
Age of consent in multiple 1st world countries is 16 years of age. Puberty has mostly finished by then, even if the body still undergoes further development until they're about 25. At 16, most childish traits are gone, even if youth is still obvious. They are adults, in essentially every way. Finding people that age physically attractive is not pedophilia, it's finding prebubescent children attractive that is, as well as attempting to sexualise them prematurely like the predatory grooming the trans community revels in.
Their argument makes no sense whatsoever, no matter how you approach it.
More importantly, I seriously doubt he's talking about 40y/o men, but teens their own age getting married and starting a family. At that age, forget forcing them to have sex, it's hard enough to get them to stop. The only novel thing he's saying for this day and age is that teens should be committed to each other before they do...
Idiots being idiots, and can't even understand what Pedo means, or the difference between Hebe and Ephebe, or even age of consent laws. It's also not grooming when they're under AoC. Also, just after puberty is when women are the most fertile, Fact.
I infer from earlier comments that he approves of traditional marriage at 16. No wonder his pervert opponents are latching onto this for their mad vaporings.
Sure is weird then how evolution made them developed enough to have babies, and that they did in fact do exactly that at that age for the entirety of human history. It's almost like this idiotic delusion is wrong and just used by various sides of politics to try to out-puritan each other.
That shit is how you get people on welfare because they do not have the responsibility or independence to take care of another person, let alone themselves.
A 16 year old mother doesn't end up on welfare if she has a husband and the support of two families.
It really is as Matt Walsh says - teen pregnancy is not really the problem. Teen pregnancy outside of wedlock is the problem.
Maybe that's a problem with modern society rather than a problem with the concept of marriage and parenthood at 16. Clearly people have been becoming more and more infantilised over the past few decades, and that has resulted in all sorts of issues, not the least of which is the fact that the West is incapable of even perpetuating its own existence due to not having children, which then leads to huge immigration which leads to cultural decay and eventually social and/or economic collapse. And all of it could've been prevented if feminists just stopped being anti-feminine narcissists and just had kids.
Yeah, but I'd argue that "competent enough to handle being an adult" is a bar that 18 also definitely doesn't reach for a lot of "average people". Nor 21. Nor 25. Nor 30. Nor 40...
I remember when it used to be very common for folks to get married in their teens back in the day. Nowadays people will consider 22 a child. lol Seriously I've seen posts complaining about how a 22-year-old isn't mature enough now.
That's because the risk of pregnancy was greater. With the pill, why buy the cow when you can get the milk for nothing? Once upon a time, when a man had a burning desire for some woman he had to propose marriage to get under her skirts and often followed through with it, especially if the woman wouldn't give it up without the actual ceremony.
These days it's way more likely that a man will knock up some slut and leave her hanging to either have an abortion or raise their spawn on her own--another topic for another thread.
Because yes, practically speaking, it's very hard to have a job lucrative enough to provide for a family at 16 years of age in the modern world. But with a family to support you in the early years, it becomes far more realistic.
High school itself is a skewed priority. College even moreso, not to mention public education as a whole. The age of majority being functionally split three different ways is a skewed priority.
Nor is biological maturity, which is fairly set, comparable at all to the vileness of Islam marrying off ten year olds.
Makes me nostalgic for the days when a boy dropped out to work on the farm and his girlfriend followed suit and married him once he got established with his own land or with his becoming full partner on the family homestead.
Give me the days when school was the three Rs with maybe some bible or 19th-century literature thrown in for a taste of "morals" and "culture."
With the industrial revolution and the migration to the cities, Harvard creeps like Conant and Dewey began fucking with public education, making it a program of social engineering--a curse that has remained with us ever since, and it's getting worse.
Was Kinsey a fantasy? How about Foucault? Harvey Milk? The overwhelming majority of pedophiles fall in one category and it’s not straight
lol @ these people pretending they have a problem with 16 year olds getting laid.
Also, 16 is legal across the majority of the United States, and the majority of the planet.
https://www.fightfor25.com
Parody site that brilliantly illustrates a very real phenomenon: whenever a woman makes a bad decision, it's because she was too young and an evil man manipulated her, even if she's well into adulthood.
These people would happily claim a woman in her 20s is too young to know any better if it furthers the narrative of men bad and/or allows them to participate in a Two Minutes Hate.
I am gay. The Gay Community has a grooming problem. This is painful to admit because we were all demonized as pedos for so long, but where there is smoke, there is fire. Just like the Catholic Church, there are several bad ones, but there are a lot more good ones, and those who aren't in on the pedo bullshit are trying to protect the reputation of the whole by hiding the pedos. No, you cast out the pedophiles and you cast out their enablers!
imagine modern left having an argument
Forgive me for not believing the people on that Twitter thread. I’d like to hear the full context or hear him address it.
Age of consent in multiple 1st world countries is 16 years of age. Puberty has mostly finished by then, even if the body still undergoes further development until they're about 25. At 16, most childish traits are gone, even if youth is still obvious. They are adults, in essentially every way. Finding people that age physically attractive is not pedophilia, it's finding prebubescent children attractive that is, as well as attempting to sexualise them prematurely like the predatory grooming the trans community revels in.
Their argument makes no sense whatsoever, no matter how you approach it.
More importantly, I seriously doubt he's talking about 40y/o men, but teens their own age getting married and starting a family. At that age, forget forcing them to have sex, it's hard enough to get them to stop. The only novel thing he's saying for this day and age is that teens should be committed to each other before they do...
Well at one time that was common. I know some of my great grandmothers got married around that age
Idiots being idiots, and can't even understand what Pedo means, or the difference between Hebe and Ephebe, or even age of consent laws. It's also not grooming when they're under AoC. Also, just after puberty is when women are the most fertile, Fact.
16 is the age of consent in HOW many states?
soros golem lives don't matter
Hasan is a faggot commie. Commies aren't people.
soros golem lives don't matter
It would be nice to hear what he actually said.
I infer from earlier comments that he approves of traditional marriage at 16. No wonder his pervert opponents are latching onto this for their mad vaporings.
Better to be married at 16 than whoring around.
A bit young but if they are married and have family to support them why not?
Sure is weird then how evolution made them developed enough to have babies, and that they did in fact do exactly that at that age for the entirety of human history. It's almost like this idiotic delusion is wrong and just used by various sides of politics to try to out-puritan each other.
A 16 year old mother doesn't end up on welfare if she has a husband and the support of two families.
It really is as Matt Walsh says - teen pregnancy is not really the problem. Teen pregnancy outside of wedlock is the problem.
Maybe that's a problem with modern society rather than a problem with the concept of marriage and parenthood at 16. Clearly people have been becoming more and more infantilised over the past few decades, and that has resulted in all sorts of issues, not the least of which is the fact that the West is incapable of even perpetuating its own existence due to not having children, which then leads to huge immigration which leads to cultural decay and eventually social and/or economic collapse. And all of it could've been prevented if feminists just stopped being anti-feminine narcissists and just had kids.
Yeah, but I'd argue that "competent enough to handle being an adult" is a bar that 18 also definitely doesn't reach for a lot of "average people". Nor 21. Nor 25. Nor 30. Nor 40...
World's become incompetent.
Some are, some aren't. Those capable of supporting a family should do it if they want to. Those that can't should wait.
Funny, they managed it for 99.9% of human history.
I remember when it used to be very common for folks to get married in their teens back in the day. Nowadays people will consider 22 a child. lol Seriously I've seen posts complaining about how a 22-year-old isn't mature enough now.
That's because the risk of pregnancy was greater. With the pill, why buy the cow when you can get the milk for nothing? Once upon a time, when a man had a burning desire for some woman he had to propose marriage to get under her skirts and often followed through with it, especially if the woman wouldn't give it up without the actual ceremony.
These days it's way more likely that a man will knock up some slut and leave her hanging to either have an abortion or raise their spawn on her own--another topic for another thread.
That's why he specified:
Because yes, practically speaking, it's very hard to have a job lucrative enough to provide for a family at 16 years of age in the modern world. But with a family to support you in the early years, it becomes far more realistic.
High school itself is a skewed priority. College even moreso, not to mention public education as a whole. The age of majority being functionally split three different ways is a skewed priority.
Nor is biological maturity, which is fairly set, comparable at all to the vileness of Islam marrying off ten year olds.
Makes me nostalgic for the days when a boy dropped out to work on the farm and his girlfriend followed suit and married him once he got established with his own land or with his becoming full partner on the family homestead.
Give me the days when school was the three Rs with maybe some bible or 19th-century literature thrown in for a taste of "morals" and "culture."
With the industrial revolution and the migration to the cities, Harvard creeps like Conant and Dewey began fucking with public education, making it a program of social engineering--a curse that has remained with us ever since, and it's getting worse.
UK has entered the chat.