Sure is weird then how evolution made them developed enough to have babies, and that they did in fact do exactly that at that age for the entirety of human history. It's almost like this idiotic delusion is wrong and just used by various sides of politics to try to out-puritan each other.
That shit is how you get people on welfare because they do not have the responsibility or independence to take care of another person, let alone themselves.
A 16 year old mother doesn't end up on welfare if she has a husband and the support of two families.
It really is as Matt Walsh says - teen pregnancy is not really the problem. Teen pregnancy outside of wedlock is the problem.
Maybe that's a problem with modern society rather than a problem with the concept of marriage and parenthood at 16. Clearly people have been becoming more and more infantilised over the past few decades, and that has resulted in all sorts of issues, not the least of which is the fact that the West is incapable of even perpetuating its own existence due to not having children, which then leads to huge immigration which leads to cultural decay and eventually social and/or economic collapse. And all of it could've been prevented if feminists just stopped being anti-feminine narcissists and just had kids.
Yeah, but I'd argue that "competent enough to handle being an adult" is a bar that 18 also definitely doesn't reach for a lot of "average people". Nor 21. Nor 25. Nor 30. Nor 40...
I remember when it used to be very common for folks to get married in their teens back in the day. Nowadays people will consider 22 a child. lol Seriously I've seen posts complaining about how a 22-year-old isn't mature enough now.
That's because the risk of pregnancy was greater. With the pill, why buy the cow when you can get the milk for nothing? Once upon a time, when a man had a burning desire for some woman he had to propose marriage to get under her skirts and often followed through with it, especially if the woman wouldn't give it up without the actual ceremony.
These days it's way more likely that a man will knock up some slut and leave her hanging to either have an abortion or raise their spawn on her own--another topic for another thread.
Because yes, practically speaking, it's very hard to have a job lucrative enough to provide for a family at 16 years of age in the modern world. But with a family to support you in the early years, it becomes far more realistic.
A bit young but if they are married and have family to support them why not?
Sure is weird then how evolution made them developed enough to have babies, and that they did in fact do exactly that at that age for the entirety of human history. It's almost like this idiotic delusion is wrong and just used by various sides of politics to try to out-puritan each other.
A 16 year old mother doesn't end up on welfare if she has a husband and the support of two families.
It really is as Matt Walsh says - teen pregnancy is not really the problem. Teen pregnancy outside of wedlock is the problem.
Maybe that's a problem with modern society rather than a problem with the concept of marriage and parenthood at 16. Clearly people have been becoming more and more infantilised over the past few decades, and that has resulted in all sorts of issues, not the least of which is the fact that the West is incapable of even perpetuating its own existence due to not having children, which then leads to huge immigration which leads to cultural decay and eventually social and/or economic collapse. And all of it could've been prevented if feminists just stopped being anti-feminine narcissists and just had kids.
Yeah, but I'd argue that "competent enough to handle being an adult" is a bar that 18 also definitely doesn't reach for a lot of "average people". Nor 21. Nor 25. Nor 30. Nor 40...
World's become incompetent.
Some are, some aren't. Those capable of supporting a family should do it if they want to. Those that can't should wait.
Funny, they managed it for 99.9% of human history.
I remember when it used to be very common for folks to get married in their teens back in the day. Nowadays people will consider 22 a child. lol Seriously I've seen posts complaining about how a 22-year-old isn't mature enough now.
That's because the risk of pregnancy was greater. With the pill, why buy the cow when you can get the milk for nothing? Once upon a time, when a man had a burning desire for some woman he had to propose marriage to get under her skirts and often followed through with it, especially if the woman wouldn't give it up without the actual ceremony.
These days it's way more likely that a man will knock up some slut and leave her hanging to either have an abortion or raise their spawn on her own--another topic for another thread.
That's why he specified:
Because yes, practically speaking, it's very hard to have a job lucrative enough to provide for a family at 16 years of age in the modern world. But with a family to support you in the early years, it becomes far more realistic.