She looks alright, fairly attractive which means that at least the far left haven't fully infiltrated (looking at how female characters got progressively more ugly as the studios went more left)
It at least confirms character switching so we'll probably have 3 we can switch to (another one is a guy) but the crux will always be the story. No one had a problem with a female protagonist in the next GTA (some probably loved the idea of playing a hot chick firing an AR 15 at cops after robbing a bank) the REAL issue is writing, if that's screwed then it's over since that is the primary reason people loved the previous main characters.
One of the things that really stuck out playing Ghost of Tsushima was the distinct lack of remotely attractive female characters. I'm not terribly weeby, nor do I have the old yellow fever, but even an average Japanese chick could be considered reasonably attractive.
Sucker Punch presumably couldn't be having any of that shit.
She looks alright, fairly attractive which means that at least the far left haven't fully infiltrated (looking at how female characters got progressively more ugly as the studios went more left)
You can't turn on a dime. First, you introduce 'diverse' characters who are normal and respectable. And when that's welcomed, you steadily make them more odious.
True which is why I'm going to use the writing as a true test of if they've fully fallen, which is one of the reasons I never pre order anymore and wait 1-2 weeks to buy a game (last exception was Doom Eternal)
Best example of this, the recent Saints Row, the dialogue and writing was MAJOR red flags before anything else and when it released, all the bugs and horrible gameplay were the cherry on top.
Writing is always a precursor to when a series goes to shit.
..confirms character switching so we'll probably have..
My dude. GTA6 campaign will be a pathetic excuse. Just a vehicle for the real multiplayer product. Please don't buy, at least not before trusted reviews.
Like who? Most reviews that come out as soon as the game is released are not very informative.
Gotta wait a few months at the very least for a detailed review. Also, these reviewers never point out the wokeness in these games.
Ok correction, no one but Impy, genuine misogynists not those called that because they didn't lay down in a puddle for women and Fox News cared about it.
Patriarchal societies like the Arabs and China are more 50/50 as one hand don't like a woman that isn't in the kitchen but on the other they control her so preferences.
I do see them forced to accommodate thanks to the trans push (oh look consequences of your own actions hehe) but on large scale no.
It's slightly our fault as we applied the outliers to the general, there are SOME women that prefer to be around men and engage in their hobbies like men, that doesn't mean ALL women can or have the same attitude. Same with the reverse of men in women's hobbies. It's why we had Tomboys and Femboys, they are the exemption not the rule.
Do you ever, and I mean ever see them try to accommodate others in their hobbies? Fuck no.
Yes. Women have not gate-kept me out of dance, gardening, or opera.
Honestly, it's a problem with their agreeableness. I've never seen a woman properly gatekeep by accusing me of being a poser for not having 2 inches of mulch to retain moisture for my Dahlias.
Like most people, most women are happy to chat about their hobbies when you start involving yourself.
The problem is that there are a sub-set of women who could try to be the crazy bitch that takes over a hobby group and uses it as her own personal status vehicle. Those women end up fighting with other women as the whole thing collapses. Also, most of those women don't have men in their lives, so they can't depend on a man's status to support them, and have to hold captive a seized social group.
How were the previous games better than the 2022 version?
You will get different opinions on this. I personally like Saints Row 1 and LOVE Saints Row 2. And Saints Row 3 is where the series went down hill for me, though Saints Row 3 is popular. The first 2 games had IMO a good balance of wackyness & seriousness. Saints Row 3 goes full wacky and it is just not what it should be to me. And from what I have seen online, Saints Row has been a overly wacky series since then.
Also Saints Row 2 was packed with alot of different side activities, while Saints Row 3 was lacking in side activities.
I'm guessing that at the very least, the 4th game allowed you to have a female protagonist.
Saints Row has allowed for a female protaganist since the 2nd game.
Did they not say you can chose a male or female character? That is not bad on its own.
I'm more concerned that they want it done with sensibilities in mind, punch down not up crap.
Either they go woke or just boring. Not sure what is worse.
It is incredible reading this comment knowing you are probably referring to western White women and not like, a group of people who hate you and purposefully destroy the culture you love.
I suppose the execs at multinational media mega-corporations should take off their tiny hats, get back in the kitchen and make me a sandwich.
Many people are bad, in fact, man's fallen nature means that everyone is bad. There is no one righteous, not one. You both try to scapegoat one particular group, which in both cases have relatively good and bad people, for the universal sins of humanity.
Cultural relativism is the idea that all cultures are equal. It's got nothing to do with pointing out that groups aren't inherently evil - other than humans as a whole.
You show that you're aware that all women, blacks, jews, etc etc are not singular entities respectively, so what is your excuse? You should be capable of abstraction. You must realize you're feigning a genuine handicap that low IQ people suffer. It seems like it'd be for the sake of social virtue which would make you extremely fucking confused about this corner of society.
He will never call you, because it is obvious Antonio (and Imp) are our resident jews here at KIA2. Why else would you so vehemently defend a group of people that you should otherwise have no association to?
She looks alright, fairly attractive which means that at least the far left haven't fully infiltrated (looking at how female characters got progressively more ugly as the studios went more left)
It at least confirms character switching so we'll probably have 3 we can switch to (another one is a guy) but the crux will always be the story. No one had a problem with a female protagonist in the next GTA (some probably loved the idea of playing a hot chick firing an AR 15 at cops after robbing a bank) the REAL issue is writing, if that's screwed then it's over since that is the primary reason people loved the previous main characters.
One of the things that really stuck out playing Ghost of Tsushima was the distinct lack of remotely attractive female characters. I'm not terribly weeby, nor do I have the old yellow fever, but even an average Japanese chick could be considered reasonably attractive.
Sucker Punch presumably couldn't be having any of that shit.
You can't turn on a dime. First, you introduce 'diverse' characters who are normal and respectable. And when that's welcomed, you steadily make them more odious.
True which is why I'm going to use the writing as a true test of if they've fully fallen, which is one of the reasons I never pre order anymore and wait 1-2 weeks to buy a game (last exception was Doom Eternal)
Best example of this, the recent Saints Row, the dialogue and writing was MAJOR red flags before anything else and when it released, all the bugs and horrible gameplay were the cherry on top.
Writing is always a precursor to when a series goes to shit.
That seems to be the strategy
My dude. GTA6 campaign will be a pathetic excuse. Just a vehicle for the real multiplayer product. Please don't buy, at least not before trusted reviews.
Indeed.
Like who? Most reviews that come out as soon as the game is released are not very informative. Gotta wait a few months at the very least for a detailed review. Also, these reviewers never point out the wokeness in these games.
By trusted reviews I meant reviews that you trust. In my case, it's 8/v/ discussions.
So? Wait a few months. It's just a game and we're not starving beasts.
Okay. I thought you meant you knew a couple of reviewers who are reliable.
Lol. I was basically saying the same thing. I should have clarified.
I wonder if we saw the same leaks. She looks fat.
Unless you got confused when she was walk/running around crouched, she ain't fat, she isn't even near the same level of fat as Franklin's aunt.
Ok correction, no one but Impy, genuine misogynists not those called that because they didn't lay down in a puddle for women and Fox News cared about it.
Patriarchal societies like the Arabs and China are more 50/50 as one hand don't like a woman that isn't in the kitchen but on the other they control her so preferences.
I do see them forced to accommodate thanks to the trans push (oh look consequences of your own actions hehe) but on large scale no.
It's slightly our fault as we applied the outliers to the general, there are SOME women that prefer to be around men and engage in their hobbies like men, that doesn't mean ALL women can or have the same attitude. Same with the reverse of men in women's hobbies. It's why we had Tomboys and Femboys, they are the exemption not the rule.
Yes. Women have not gate-kept me out of dance, gardening, or opera.
Honestly, it's a problem with their agreeableness. I've never seen a woman properly gatekeep by accusing me of being a poser for not having 2 inches of mulch to retain moisture for my Dahlias.
Like most people, most women are happy to chat about their hobbies when you start involving yourself.
The problem is that there are a sub-set of women who could try to be the crazy bitch that takes over a hobby group and uses it as her own personal status vehicle. Those women end up fighting with other women as the whole thing collapses. Also, most of those women don't have men in their lives, so they can't depend on a man's status to support them, and have to hold captive a seized social group.
It worked when Saints Row was good because you could make her hot.
Cranks tiddy slider to max. You know... just to test the physics.
You will get different opinions on this. I personally like Saints Row 1 and LOVE Saints Row 2. And Saints Row 3 is where the series went down hill for me, though Saints Row 3 is popular. The first 2 games had IMO a good balance of wackyness & seriousness. Saints Row 3 goes full wacky and it is just not what it should be to me. And from what I have seen online, Saints Row has been a overly wacky series since then.
Also Saints Row 2 was packed with alot of different side activities, while Saints Row 3 was lacking in side activities.
Saints Row has allowed for a female protaganist since the 2nd game.
Call me crazy, but a Grand Thot Auto taking place entirely in the kitchen isn't terribly appealing to me.
She has a dump truck, so that's a plus.
At least she's Latina, something different and new for once. They could've done the typical and made her a strong black woman. eyeroll.
But if we play a female won't we miss out on the GTA tradition of getting laid with a hooker and then running her over ? Or will we play the hooker ?
It's [Current Year], we can have lesbian hookers!
Did they not say you can chose a male or female character? That is not bad on its own. I'm more concerned that they want it done with sensibilities in mind, punch down not up crap.
Either they go woke or just boring. Not sure what is worse.
Nice posting news from like 3 months ago.
Don't care.
It is incredible reading this comment knowing you are probably referring to western White women and not like, a group of people who hate you and purposefully destroy the culture you love.
I suppose the execs at multinational media mega-corporations should take off their tiny hats, get back in the kitchen and make me a sandwich.
"WOMEN ARE BAD!"
"No, DA JOOZ ARE BAD!"
[insert jpg of two apes fighting each other]
child thought.
Many people are bad, in fact, man's fallen nature means that everyone is bad. There is no one righteous, not one. You both try to scapegoat one particular group, which in both cases have relatively good and bad people, for the universal sins of humanity.
That makes you both idiots.
This is essentially cultural relativism, and it’s retarded.
Cultural relativism is the idea that all cultures are equal. It's got nothing to do with pointing out that groups aren't inherently evil - other than humans as a whole.
You show that you're aware that all women, blacks, jews, etc etc are not singular entities respectively, so what is your excuse? You should be capable of abstraction. You must realize you're feigning a genuine handicap that low IQ people suffer. It seems like it'd be for the sake of social virtue which would make you extremely fucking confused about this corner of society.
You're not making much sense and seem to contradict yourself. But do go ahead and enlighten me about "this corner of society".
"this group is bad"
"no this group is bad"
"lul apes!!"
"nobody is bad??"
"no... everybody is bad..."
everyone here was paid 0.03 shekels per post
call me when respected, powerful and wealthy jewish leaders stop calling you dumb cattle made to serve them, antonio
He will never call you, because it is obvious Antonio (and Imp) are our resident jews here at KIA2. Why else would you so vehemently defend a group of people that you should otherwise have no association to?