They're really proving only men are responsible with power at this point
As what did we have, thousands of years, minus the odd war and genocide (not my fault I couldn't understand them and they had shiny things) there wasn't really a targeting of just women to this extent. It's pretty much vindictive which shows they shouldn't have power as vindictive actions always lead to a explosive response.
I was watching a recent video by Aydin Paladin on YouTube called the "Girl Boss Paradox" where she cited a bunch of studies about male and female happiness. The studies showed that women are actually less happy in countries where they have more freedom and equality with men.
I think there's a fair amount of evidence that women are happiest when men are in charge. You can even see this in the type of men that women are naturally attracted to and what type of romantic/sexual fantasies women have. Despite the fact that most women would vehemently deny this, all the evidence says they WANT to be subservient to strong men.
This also aligns with Christian belief:
Wives, subject yourselves to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is the head of the church, He Himself being the Savior of the body. But as the church is subject to Christ, so also the wives ought to be to their husbands in everything. -- Ephesians 5:22
In the same way, you wives, be subject to your own husbands so that even if any of them are disobedient to the word, they may be won over without a word by the behavior of their wives, as they observe your pure and respectful behavior. -- 1 Peter 3:1-2
Wives, be subject to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. -- Colossians 3:18
I don't really know what to do with this knowledge, but it's interesting. I think at very least it illustrates how self-destructive our society has become despite all of our technological advancements.
We have the growing issue in the west of taking a particular and applying it to the general. There are some women who are naturally more dominant and are happier in charge.
There a lot more women who see that, think that's what they should be and copy that only to feel isolated, alone and without purpose so end up bitter and vindictive. Same with a lot problems we have, trans, promiscuity, vaccines, diets, energy etc we are taking the few examples of where it works or is the case and going "well if it they got it to work so can we"
And now we are apparently heading to having 45% of women single in 2030 (slow claps)
Most western countries have anti discrimination laws, yet also have high profile companies running job ads for only non-straight-white-males without consequence.
To be fair, after trucks, the most dangerous thing on the road is teenage boys.
Show of hands, how many of us know someone who got into a major accident before 21. I do. He died on impact.
Insurance companies know this, which is why insuring a teenage boy costs close to double what insuring his twin sister does. We really can't deny the vastly increased propensity for risk-taking in young males.
...But there's gotta be a better way of looking at the problem than this.
P1 or red P-platers aged under 25 in NSW were currently not permitted to drive with more than one passenger under the age of 21 between the hours of 11pm and 5am.
P2 or green P-platers must ensure all occupants, including themselves, are in a seat that has a seatbelt or an approved restraint fitted, and that each passenger is using the seatbelt or restraint.
They're really proving only men are responsible with power at this point
As what did we have, thousands of years, minus the odd war and genocide (not my fault I couldn't understand them and they had shiny things) there wasn't really a targeting of just women to this extent. It's pretty much vindictive which shows they shouldn't have power as vindictive actions always lead to a explosive response.
I was watching a recent video by Aydin Paladin on YouTube called the "Girl Boss Paradox" where she cited a bunch of studies about male and female happiness. The studies showed that women are actually less happy in countries where they have more freedom and equality with men.
I think there's a fair amount of evidence that women are happiest when men are in charge. You can even see this in the type of men that women are naturally attracted to and what type of romantic/sexual fantasies women have. Despite the fact that most women would vehemently deny this, all the evidence says they WANT to be subservient to strong men.
This also aligns with Christian belief:
I don't really know what to do with this knowledge, but it's interesting. I think at very least it illustrates how self-destructive our society has become despite all of our technological advancements.
We have the growing issue in the west of taking a particular and applying it to the general. There are some women who are naturally more dominant and are happier in charge.
There a lot more women who see that, think that's what they should be and copy that only to feel isolated, alone and without purpose so end up bitter and vindictive. Same with a lot problems we have, trans, promiscuity, vaccines, diets, energy etc we are taking the few examples of where it works or is the case and going "well if it they got it to work so can we"
And now we are apparently heading to having 45% of women single in 2030 (slow claps)
Freedom from the continuation of the human species?
I agree, but that's such a negative word.
Ban young female "I'm sorry I was texting" drivers while you're at it then.
Ez solution:
I'm car-gender. Give me my license
Would this be legal? It would be blatant discrimination
Forget it Jake, it's Australia.
In the US it is legal to charge male drivers more for insurance.
In Canada it's legal to change your gender to get cheaper car insurance.
Most "anti-discrimination" laws have exception provisions that allow for discrimination against men, whites and asians.
I fully agree but there must be a law about not discriminating via gender, I assume. How could they defend that.
Most western countries have anti discrimination laws, yet also have high profile companies running job ads for only non-straight-white-males without consequence.
A law that isn't enforced effectively ceases to exist.
A law that doesn't obeyed is effectively abolished. The Romans called it desuetudo.
The Mad Max sequel nobody wanted
Oh, is it time to reference statistics in order to implement sweeping restrictions of certain age/gender/race?
Lemme just load up the FBI crime stats...
Does that mean we can ban women from working altogether if we're doing things to help society?
LOL.
I support this. Let them push the envelope and move ever more people into overt resistance to the regime.
To be fair, after trucks, the most dangerous thing on the road is teenage boys.
Show of hands, how many of us know someone who got into a major accident before 21. I do. He died on impact.
Insurance companies know this, which is why insuring a teenage boy costs close to double what insuring his twin sister does. We really can't deny the vastly increased propensity for risk-taking in young males.
...But there's gotta be a better way of looking at the problem than this.
This is real by the way
For of all sad words of tongue or pen...