35
Comments (30)
sorted by:
25
SoctaticMethod1 25 points ago +25 / -0

They're really proving only men are responsible with power at this point

As what did we have, thousands of years, minus the odd war and genocide (not my fault I couldn't understand them and they had shiny things) there wasn't really a targeting of just women to this extent. It's pretty much vindictive which shows they shouldn't have power as vindictive actions always lead to a explosive response.

15
novanleon 15 points ago +15 / -0

I was watching a recent video by Aydin Paladin on YouTube called the "Girl Boss Paradox" where she cited a bunch of studies about male and female happiness. The studies showed that women are actually less happy in countries where they have more freedom and equality with men.

I think there's a fair amount of evidence that women are happiest when men are in charge. You can even see this in the type of men that women are naturally attracted to and what type of romantic/sexual fantasies women have. Despite the fact that most women would vehemently deny this, all the evidence says they WANT to be subservient to strong men.

This also aligns with Christian belief:

Wives, subject yourselves to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is the head of the church, He Himself being the Savior of the body. But as the church is subject to Christ, so also the wives ought to be to their husbands in everything. -- Ephesians 5:22

In the same way, you wives, be subject to your own husbands so that even if any of them are disobedient to the word, they may be won over without a word by the behavior of their wives, as they observe your pure and respectful behavior. -- 1 Peter 3:1-2

Wives, be subject to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. -- Colossians 3:18

I don't really know what to do with this knowledge, but it's interesting. I think at very least it illustrates how self-destructive our society has become despite all of our technological advancements.

8
SoctaticMethod1 8 points ago +8 / -0

We have the growing issue in the west of taking a particular and applying it to the general. There are some women who are naturally more dominant and are happier in charge.

There a lot more women who see that, think that's what they should be and copy that only to feel isolated, alone and without purpose so end up bitter and vindictive. Same with a lot problems we have, trans, promiscuity, vaccines, diets, energy etc we are taking the few examples of where it works or is the case and going "well if it they got it to work so can we"

And now we are apparently heading to having 45% of women single in 2030 (slow claps)

-3
TheImpossible1 [S] -3 points ago +4 / -7

And now we are apparently heading to having 45% of women single in 2030

Progress. But it can be higher.

Freedom is necessary.

6
AntonioOfVenice 6 points ago +6 / -0

Freedom from the continuation of the human species?

-3
TheImpossible1 [S] -3 points ago +3 / -6

You believe the world's leaders would just let that happen?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

Despite the fact that most women would vehemently deny this, all the evidence says they WANT to be subservient to strong men.

I agree, but that's such a negative word.

19
16
cartoonericroberts 16 points ago +16 / -0

For of all sad words of tongue or pen...

14
ApparentlyImAHeretic 14 points ago +14 / -0

Ban young female "I'm sorry I was texting" drivers while you're at it then.

13
Vicious_snek6 13 points ago +13 / -0

Ez solution:

I'm car-gender. Give me my license

12
Galean 12 points ago +12 / -0

Would this be legal? It would be blatant discrimination

23
TheImpossible1 [S] 23 points ago +28 / -5

If legality = 0 AND target = Male, then run femalejudge.exe

6
Galean 6 points ago +7 / -1

I fully agree but there must be a law about not discriminating via gender, I assume. How could they defend that.

22
ApparentlyImAHeretic 22 points ago +22 / -0

Most western countries have anti discrimination laws, yet also have high profile companies running job ads for only non-straight-white-males without consequence.

9
Indipendepede 9 points ago +9 / -0

A law that isn't enforced effectively ceases to exist.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

A law that doesn't obeyed is effectively abolished. The Romans called it desuetudo.

13
yvaN_ehT_nioJ 13 points ago +13 / -0

Forget it Jake, it's Australia.

10
Nikola_S1 10 points ago +10 / -0

In the US it is legal to charge male drivers more for insurance.

3
the_nybbler 3 points ago +3 / -0

In Canada it's legal to change your gender to get cheaper car insurance.

4
dnile1000bc 4 points ago +4 / -0

Most "anti-discrimination" laws have exception provisions that allow for discrimination against men, whites and asians.

7
acp_k2win 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Mad Max sequel nobody wanted

5
Ricky_CIA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh, is it time to reference statistics in order to implement sweeping restrictions of certain age/gender/race?

Lemme just load up the FBI crime stats...

3
BorderInvader 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does that mean we can ban women from working altogether if we're doing things to help society?

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Road safety experts say

LOL.

I support this. Let them push the envelope and move ever more people into overt resistance to the regime.

1
Steampunk_Moustache 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, after trucks, the most dangerous thing on the road is teenage boys.

Show of hands, how many of us know someone who got into a major accident before 21. I do. He died on impact.

Insurance companies know this, which is why insuring a teenage boy costs close to double what insuring his twin sister does. We really can't deny the vastly increased propensity for risk-taking in young males.

...But there's gotta be a better way of looking at the problem than this.

-2
TheImpossible1 [S] -2 points ago +2 / -4

how many of us know someone who got into a major accident before 21.

I was that person, crappy car burst into flames on the motorway and I had no brakes at all.

Other than me, two of my friends wrapped their first cars around trees, one crashed into a postbox trying to impress a girl.

Still not as bad as the woman on our old street, who caused a four car pile-up, while parking.


But there's gotta be a better way of looking at the problem than this.

They don't want to solve the problem. They want to make men's lives worse. That was their goal from their first day of university and probably before that.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

P1 or red P-platers aged under 25 in NSW were currently not permitted to drive with more than one passenger under the age of 21 between the hours of 11pm and 5am. P2 or green P-platers must ensure all occupants, including themselves, are in a seat that has a seatbelt or an approved restraint fitted, and that each passenger is using the seatbelt or restraint.

This is real by the way

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0