This policy literally does the opposite of that. Every time it's implemented, in only creates more fatherless families as women choose the state as their breadwinner over the father.
It's a kind of creature in Game of Thrones that threatened to overrun the entire island.
When more characters exposed themselves as despicable and/or the remaining good ones died, people would says: "OK, rooting for the Whitewalkers now [i.e., to destroy the whole thing]"
Just one month ago, you were taking credit for falling birthhrates and sperging out big time over it. HAHA, TAKE THAT, WOMANS! YOUR REIGN OF TERROR IS OVER!
Now having children is 'the right thing'? Which is it?
this isn't what he was elected to do.
The guy who has never been to Korea is going to decide "what he was elected to do", which is apparently "mass arrests".
I don't think it's the right thing. I just accepted the premise to avoid the usual retarded bullshit of "if you don't want to sell your soul for birth rates, you're a Jew".
Extinction is the right thing?
If you asked his voters
OK, guy who's never been to Korea, and who shilled for Macron twice, and for an pro-abortion candidate in PH because his pro-life opponent was a woman. Do tell me what "his voters" replied when you asked. And how you established that this is indeed widely held sentiment among his voters.
they would say members of Megalia should have been arrested a long time ago.
You're mad that she said "you don't have to hate men to be a feminist". Trying to redefine feminism. That is why Macron is going to be far more sympathetic to feminism than Le Pen, but you don't actually care about that, do you? You care about hating women.
as did Miss Pink Revolution.
Proof? So being anti-abortion is feminism. Hey, you're a feminist!
He pledged to do something about Megalia, but refused to speak further.
You're mad that she said "you don't have to hate men to be a feminist". Trying to redefine feminism.
You actually do. Also why the hell should leftists be allowed to get off scot free once again for their bullshit. Same revisionism that progressives used in the early 1900s when they dropped the progressive label for a few decades once the stink attached. This asshat is supposedly right wing too.
Since when are you a Korean? The fuck you think you have to do with Koreans, Imp? He did not betray you, he didn't even get your vote.
You do not own men all over the planet. Your crazy is showing again.
Feminism is about "liberating" women from the duties of motherhood
More generally, from biology.
I don't know how to explain that to you in a way you will understand.
You cannot argue someone out of a position by reason when he did not arrive at the position by reason.
He has some issues. Either bad experiences with the womans, paranoid personality disorder, or maybe he got trapped in an online echochamber where he heard only horrorstories about the womans (also a leading cause of female radicalization into feminism).
Paying women to make babies has literally never succeeded in raising the birth rate of any society that tries it. It only creates more fatherless children by incentivizing even more women to kick the father out of the home and replace him with the state as their breadwinner. There is nothing anti-feminist about it.
It's bad form to bring up issues you have with people on unrelated threads.
But alright, I'll bite. Just because you managed to convince yourself that Ukraine is pure and saintly, doesn't mean everyone else has to. In fact, Western-backed "human rights" organizations and media have pointed out Ukraine's targeting of civilian areas in Donetsk - which they continued without a hitch as soon as Russia started the war.
There was also nothing to "continue" after Russia "started" (resumed) the war. Just go back to Patrick Lancaster's channel and see all the parades in Donetsk after February, and the frontlines (just outside the city, including in the suburbs) practically didn't change and they're still in artillery range of every kind and caliber (plus missiles, and aircraft). They're being hit there by artillery and missiles alright (notably with HIMARS), but it's never on these crowded parades (crowds of soldiers, but also crowds of civilians) or anything remotely civilian, but just on purely military targets. The only mass casualty event was from fragments of a shot down missile.
If they only wanted, they could easily massacre hundreds or even thousands (including many soldiers, and even top commanders and other leaders) during any of these parades and other mass events (both nowadays and during all these years). Again, look at these parades. This is your "human shields" right there. And it works, makes these crowds of troops and leaders untouchable.
But you for some reason came to believe the silly lie according to which they target and "terrorize" the civilians in particular. Just because someone lied to you on the internet. Or was it also Russian mass media? Or was even Putin personally?
Just like he personally lied to Oliver Stone when he showed him the famous American footage from Afghanistan as a Russian footage from Syria. Makes just you as guilible this demented boomer. Sad. (But would be funny if you got your "info" from Stone, too. He's made a "documentary" about it, I heard.)
So, who was it who easily convinced you so about something that never happened? Please, tell me.
It's not "pure and saintly" (they're just humans), but there was nothing to "point out" after February 2015 when large battles (offensives by either side, and there were only Russian ones after August '14) ended and there was only low level hostilities in the trenches, occasionally and less and less (and practically nothing since Zelensky was elected, no one on either side killed or injured on an average day). These are the facts.
Maybe actually go and check out what "Western-backed "human rights" organizations and media have pointed out" for 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, because you just didn't.
The last big attack on a civ area outside of battle (and the last battle was for Debaltsevo ending in Feb '15, and it wrecked the city) was when the Russians rocketed Mariupol in January of that year just as they officially ended the Minsk-1 ceasefire (to attack Debaltseve full-scale): https://press.un.org/en/2015/sgsm16485.doc.htm (there was no revenge attack for that, and there were no such incidents after 2015 at all.
Well here's one of those tradcon wet dream policies that has literally never worked in practice.
Every single time this is tried, it fails to raise the birth rate and only results in more fatherless homes and broken kids as women take the money and dispose of the man whom they would otherwise need to be their provider.
You can't rebuild the traditional family by giving mothers the option to replace fathers with the state, because most of them will choose the latter.
If you were female, you'd be Valerie Solanas or whatever her name is.
If you're this mad at woman even though you haven't suffered at all at their hands, imagine if they had the massive rates of murder, rape and child molestation that men do.
In b4 "Hitller's mother was to blame for his crimes".
LISTEN UP, PRESIDENT OF KOREA! We, the British immigrants to the US, will not forget your BETRAYAL and TREASON! You will PAY for siding with the Oppressor Gender by trying to ensure the future of human civilization.
bribing them to solve a problem they caused
Just over a month ago, you were saying that so called "MGTOW" are winning because of lower birth-rates. Now the Nazi gender caused it. Which is it?
I should have known women would never allow
The 101st Dumb Slut Brigade has a lot of power, yes.
We as in "everyone anti-feminist", which includes the vast majority of their voters.
And you imagine that everyone anti-feminist is a woman-hating sperg like you?
MGTOW isn't a thing in Korea.
So you claim that feminism is worse in Korea than elsewhere, and still somehow men didn't avoid women to at least the extent as in the US or EU?
They're about to crown their handpicked feminist despot for the UK in an hour,
I'm sure the votes of the 101st Dumb Slut Brigade were crucial in deciding that, and that it has nothing to do with the fact that the said despot is running against the most unpopular politician in the country.
who will defeat the WEF candidate by a large margin.
I don't think they had people chanting kill all men in massive rallies 2200 years ago
Well, the entitled rich brat females were holding rallies demanding an end to sumptuary laws prohibiting them from wearing expensive clothing and jewelry. No joke.
What we're being asked to forgive
The question is not forgiveness, the question is effectiveness.
without any justice for it is ridiculous, hence feminism lite.
One does not put the cart before the horse. One first breaks the power of the opposition, and only then does one go further. If one starts out sperging like you, one will never be in a position to accomplish 'justice'. Do you think Lenin and Hitler started out promising mass murder? No, they promised jobs, bread and peace.
First, you get into power.
If we refuse to have kids, they have to give in to our demands,
Never gonna work. All it does is a faint simulacrum of your 90% nightmare - removing men from the dating market lessens the power that women hold.
I wasn't seriously suggesting she did.
To be fair, I also have zero confidence in "voting" - but I'm not making claims without evidence.
The votes are "randomly distributed" to Conservative members, who then vote online.
Do you know how the De Medici clan ruled Florence? As in the Athenian democracy, most offices were distributed by lot. The De Medici controlled whose names entered the lot - and they paid off the debts of people who were in debt and therefore were ineligible.
Yeah, how dare he...
shuffles deck, draws card
...ensure the continuous existence of civilization
Of his race in fact.
Hilariously and unironically something that could be labelled 'racist' were it not already defined otherwise.
This policy literally does the opposite of that. Every time it's implemented, in only creates more fatherless families as women choose the state as their breadwinner over the father.
To be fair, given the current state of "civilization", one is inclined to root for the Whitewalkers.
That's a term I've never heard before, and I don't trust Urban Dictionary to tell me what it is.
What are Whitewalkers?
It's a kind of creature in Game of Thrones that threatened to overrun the entire island.
When more characters exposed themselves as despicable and/or the remaining good ones died, people would says: "OK, rooting for the Whitewalkers now [i.e., to destroy the whole thing]"
Ice zombies hellbent on wiping out the living.
The monsters in Game of Thrones.
Just one month ago, you were taking credit for falling birthhrates and sperging out big time over it. HAHA, TAKE THAT, WOMANS! YOUR REIGN OF TERROR IS OVER!
Now having children is 'the right thing'? Which is it?
The guy who has never been to Korea is going to decide "what he was elected to do", which is apparently "mass arrests".
Extinction is the right thing?
OK, guy who's never been to Korea, and who shilled for Macron twice, and for an pro-abortion candidate in PH because his pro-life opponent was a woman. Do tell me what "his voters" replied when you asked. And how you established that this is indeed widely held sentiment among his voters.
Did he ever pledge to arrest members of Megalia?
You're mad that she said "you don't have to hate men to be a feminist". Trying to redefine feminism. That is why Macron is going to be far more sympathetic to feminism than Le Pen, but you don't actually care about that, do you? You care about hating women.
Proof? So being anti-abortion is feminism. Hey, you're a feminist!
So you made that up.
You actually do. Also why the hell should leftists be allowed to get off scot free once again for their bullshit. Same revisionism that progressives used in the early 1900s when they dropped the progressive label for a few decades once the stink attached. This asshat is supposedly right wing too.
Paying women to be baby machines is anti-feminist.
Since when are you a Korean? The fuck you think you have to do with Koreans, Imp? He did not betray you, he didn't even get your vote.
You do not own men all over the planet. Your crazy is showing again.
He doesn’t know who you are. You aren’t Allie’s. You aren’t countrymen. The fact that you are both men does not make him your ally for anything.
Except for Bulba, of course, because she's a member of the Dread Gender.
When you say 'we', who among the anti-feminists think that women are 'oppressors'? Other than you and your dick (I guess that is plural)?
Very good national socialist style policy. I'd love to see more nations adopt laws like that, as long as it doesn't subsidize foreigners over natives.
Feminism is about "liberating" women from the duties of motherhood. What he is doing is both anti-feminist and pro-family.
If there are no babies born then there isn't a country to govern. I don't know how to explain that to you in a way you will understand.
More generally, from biology.
You cannot argue someone out of a position by reason when he did not arrive at the position by reason.
He has some issues. Either bad experiences with the womans, paranoid personality disorder, or maybe he got trapped in an online echochamber where he heard only horrorstories about the womans (also a leading cause of female radicalization into feminism).
Paying women to make babies has literally never succeeded in raising the birth rate of any society that tries it. It only creates more fatherless children by incentivizing even more women to kick the father out of the home and replace him with the state as their breadwinner. There is nothing anti-feminist about it.
You just have to make it a requirement that the mother and father are together to earn the money.
Proof?
Imp heard South Korea having an "Incel Revolution" (his words) and instantly codified it as truth.
Speaking of which, so what's about you being told about "terror shelling" and it becoming your dogma just because someone told you?
It's bad form to bring up issues you have with people on unrelated threads.
But alright, I'll bite. Just because you managed to convince yourself that Ukraine is pure and saintly, doesn't mean everyone else has to. In fact, Western-backed "human rights" organizations and media have pointed out Ukraine's targeting of civilian areas in Donetsk - which they continued without a hitch as soon as Russia started the war.
Of course, I can't persuade you, because Poland.
There was also nothing to "continue" after Russia "started" (resumed) the war. Just go back to Patrick Lancaster's channel and see all the parades in Donetsk after February, and the frontlines (just outside the city, including in the suburbs) practically didn't change and they're still in artillery range of every kind and caliber (plus missiles, and aircraft). They're being hit there by artillery and missiles alright (notably with HIMARS), but it's never on these crowded parades (crowds of soldiers, but also crowds of civilians) or anything remotely civilian, but just on purely military targets. The only mass casualty event was from fragments of a shot down missile.
If they only wanted, they could easily massacre hundreds or even thousands (including many soldiers, and even top commanders and other leaders) during any of these parades and other mass events (both nowadays and during all these years). Again, look at these parades. This is your "human shields" right there. And it works, makes these crowds of troops and leaders untouchable.
But you for some reason came to believe the silly lie according to which they target and "terrorize" the civilians in particular. Just because someone lied to you on the internet. Or was it also Russian mass media? Or was even Putin personally?
Just like he personally lied to Oliver Stone when he showed him the famous American footage from Afghanistan as a Russian footage from Syria. Makes just you as guilible this demented boomer. Sad. (But would be funny if you got your "info" from Stone, too. He's made a "documentary" about it, I heard.)
So, who was it who easily convinced you so about something that never happened? Please, tell me.
It's not "pure and saintly" (they're just humans), but there was nothing to "point out" after February 2015 when large battles (offensives by either side, and there were only Russian ones after August '14) ended and there was only low level hostilities in the trenches, occasionally and less and less (and practically nothing since Zelensky was elected, no one on either side killed or injured on an average day). These are the facts.
Maybe actually go and check out what "Western-backed "human rights" organizations and media have pointed out" for 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, because you just didn't.
The last big attack on a civ area outside of battle (and the last battle was for Debaltsevo ending in Feb '15, and it wrecked the city) was when the Russians rocketed Mariupol in January of that year just as they officially ended the Minsk-1 ceasefire (to attack Debaltseve full-scale): https://press.un.org/en/2015/sgsm16485.doc.htm (there was no revenge attack for that, and there were no such incidents after 2015 at all.
You were fooled. What now?
Maybe it will keep them out of the workplace and give men some peace and quiet.
"We the Koreans...."
I was going to say something, but engaging you in good faith is absolutely stupid.
So I'm just gonna sit here and laugh at your pathetic faggish behavior.
You literally behave like a hysterical woman or faggot. It's like you always have sand in your vagina. Perpetually with your panties on a bunch.
I just hope you finally decide to try having sex with a dude, so once you're riding on the dick carrousel, you'll at least calm down a little.
Very much like hysterical women, what you need is some dick.
You inspire it in people.
...
Well here's one of those tradcon wet dream policies that has literally never worked in practice.
Every single time this is tried, it fails to raise the birth rate and only results in more fatherless homes and broken kids as women take the money and dispose of the man whom they would otherwise need to be their provider.
You can't rebuild the traditional family by giving mothers the option to replace fathers with the state, because most of them will choose the latter.
If you were female, you'd be Valerie Solanas or whatever her name is.
If you're this mad at woman even though you haven't suffered at all at their hands, imagine if they had the massive rates of murder, rape and child molestation that men do.
In b4 "Hitller's mother was to blame for his crimes".
Whatevee happened to your, quote, Incel Revolution?
But I told you it was not true and there was never really such a thing, Jesus Christ man
Is this copypasta?
LISTEN UP, PRESIDENT OF KOREA! We, the British immigrants to the US, will not forget your BETRAYAL and TREASON! You will PAY for siding with the Oppressor Gender by trying to ensure the future of human civilization.
Just over a month ago, you were saying that so called "MGTOW" are winning because of lower birth-rates. Now the Nazi gender caused it. Which is it?
The 101st Dumb Slut Brigade has a lot of power, yes.
And you imagine that everyone anti-feminist is a woman-hating sperg like you?
So you claim that feminism is worse in Korea than elsewhere, and still somehow men didn't avoid women to at least the extent as in the US or EU?
I'm sure the votes of the 101st Dumb Slut Brigade were crucial in deciding that, and that it has nothing to do with the fact that the said despot is running against the most unpopular politician in the country.
Eh, I'd rather have the WEF candidate.
Aww... I'm so disappointed in Marcus Porcius Cato. Turns out he was feminism lite 2200 years before feminism existed!
Ah, I see. YOU'RE NOT GETTING THIS PRECIOUS DICK, WOMANS! DIE MAD ABOUT IT!
Another gem from the "90% died from the vaccine" guy.
Well, the entitled rich brat females were holding rallies demanding an end to sumptuary laws prohibiting them from wearing expensive clothing and jewelry. No joke.
The question is not forgiveness, the question is effectiveness.
One does not put the cart before the horse. One first breaks the power of the opposition, and only then does one go further. If one starts out sperging like you, one will never be in a position to accomplish 'justice'. Do you think Lenin and Hitler started out promising mass murder? No, they promised jobs, bread and peace.
First, you get into power.
Never gonna work. All it does is a faint simulacrum of your 90% nightmare - removing men from the dating market lessens the power that women hold.
To be fair, I also have zero confidence in "voting" - but I'm not making claims without evidence.
Do you know how the De Medici clan ruled Florence? As in the Athenian democracy, most offices were distributed by lot. The De Medici controlled whose names entered the lot - and they paid off the debts of people who were in debt and therefore were ineligible.
I need some of that crack you are smoking
Again please give me some of that crack. I have never heard a traditionalist say this
You
Also you
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/15JTtwT2Ai/x/c/4OdgvU5yB4U