Prejudice plus power minus black twitter
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (42)
sorted by:
Yeah, this shit is why I find it hard to be outraged by what the Stormfront crowd says.
Most groups don’t like race mixing. They just don’t admit it openly.
Black and white make the most disgusting offspring of all mixed races. Some other combinations it actually does them justice.
Blasian bitches are fine as hell
Pure Asian is gross to me
Anything mixed with black is pretty gross to me
But to each their own
No shit retard. That's why your statement was stupid
I agree with these niggers, I'm calling for a total ban on race-mixing until we figure out what's going on.
Isn't this what south American grannies told their children: to marry a white guy so they have white children? Think it was specifically Brazil where the darker skinned people were just outright disappearing.
Something like 50% of Brazil's population is what they call "brown" (mixed race) or "mestiço" (part aboriginal).
Well, it doesn't work. It would work if, for instance, white, or light, men had far more offspring than brown ones. Just telling people, oh try to marry "up" in the lightness scale results in nothing.
Technically correct because in the "minds" of most blacks racist is a synonyom for white.
(black power)
Broke: Anyone can be racist.
Woke: Only whites can be racist.
Bespoke: Be racist.
I was actually surprised to see this posted in /r/facepalm on the old Spezzit. Of course, I can't reply to any comments because I was mass banned...
Anyway, it's unfortunate because I really wanted to earn my ban by saying "I'm honestly shocked this isn't in ___ ___ twitter in a thread that rhymes with "bountry blub" -- the idiots on that site and their ability to keep their heads in the sand is truly inspiring.
The true measure of racism is the interracial crime stats!
Sorry retard, but you're a stormfag in all but color.
The funniest part of this is that it also helps to show that white racialist narrative still asserts that there is no way to become more white. As if white is the most recessive of all genes. Yet here's a black racialist complaining about generations of kids becoming whiter.
Well, this demonstrates that Kenneth Walker is an idiot racist.
And why is it you don't see that many white men marrying and reproducing with black women? Bill Burr is one notable exception that comes to mind.
Any White man that freely decides to marry a black woman is a masochist, as black women are consistently rated least attractive/desirable of all races, by all races, including black men.
Is that really Mahomes' daughter? Even though he isn't that dark himself, that does seem like just a bit too much of a jump...
Eh, he doesn't want race-mixing then he doesn't want race-mixing.
But opposition to race-mixing is assumed to be racist and black men cannot be racist . . . this is the postmodern/progressive conundrum.
Who cates what the faggot wants
The whole racism is prejudice plus power is idiotic. I imagine that idea came from some clown at university. Racism has a definition. I’m so tired of twisting words. And also they make it to where only white peoples can be held accountable for anything
This. It only exists because people want to be overtly racist, but don't want to get called racist.
Thats the magic trick, it doesnt.
It is an article of faith in the religion of modernity, and questioning it gets you targeted as a heretic.
That’s true. It’s just frustrating how they twist words that have had a clear meaning for centuries and everyone just has to go along with it
Racism does have a definition. Same as "woman". The trick is in making people accept that it doesn't.
You can try to apply one, but the term has never been used consistently. Definitions are a reaction to usage, not the other way around. "Woman" was in fact used consistently for 1000s of years in different languages. "Racism" didn't even exist for most of that time.
How about "Irrational hatred of entire races of people other than one's own"?
Too many people see hatred itself as irrational. It isn't.
Irrational is highly subjective. For example I don't want to live in a black neighborhood because black neighborhoods have a lower quality of life.
Or I don't really look at resumes that have black names or black colleges listed because as a person in a technical field I haven't found a black person who is remotely qualified to do the work I need done.
To me that is perfectly rational. But that fits most modern definitions of "racist".
Sure. Those prejudices are perfectly rational. It's another sign of the times that the word "prejudice" has a negative connotation. There are perfectly logical reasons for all sorts of aversion, from distaste to outright hate.
This condition is directly the result of the left taking control of the language via our educational institutions and publishing industry.
I think we agree that most modern definitions of "racism" are nonsense, especially the "power + prejudice" bullshit.
Well the really funny part is the person who said that didn't even mean that it was the only kind of racism. they were just adding a definition that I partially agree with, given that we've seen racist power structures throughout history.
I believe said person has come out and said that other forms exist and are extremely valid.
Not to give the leftoid so much credit, but I find it funny that even said leftoid is dismayed at how retarded their kin are.
Good points. I just really hate their mentality that they can engage in deplorable behavior but it’s ok when they do it
It's a long-term strategy to maintain the rhetoric of Leftist Inevitability: all previous generations of Leftists were actually Conservatives; all of today's Leftists are tomorrow's Conservatives.
Because Leftism has no objective principled grounding, and is only a Philosophy of War, they can take bad ideas that they had that worked against them, and declare the entire thing "right wing". TERFs are "Right-Wing", and gender essentialists are "Far Right", even though both were considered Leftwing at an earlier time.
Edit - Actually this is part of Racialism's history as well. The Left considers it to be a "conservative" ideology, that was espoused, uplifted, and institutionalized by Progressives like Woodrow Wilson.
Not entirely.
This isn't really all that different form what happened with Napolean's Empire, the Assyrian Empire, or the Soviet Empire.
The success that people without moral frameworks have is in their aggression. It allows them unrestrained aggression and deception at all times, and in all cases. This means that they get to seize the initiative most of the time. Thing is, once they hit containment, or peak expansion (natural containment), their collapse becomes inevitable and irreversible until the whole system collapses utterly.
They are very prone to cascade failures, particularly without maintenance.
A strong moral framework (any moral framework) is an excellent mechanism to resisting attrition from Leftist aggression, which is why de-moralization has to come first. When you re-assert that moral framework, it may limit your avenues of approach, but it creates a massive defensive bonus to resisting attacks.
Moreover, if you have a strong moral framework, it can allow you to take the initiative on some issues, rather than being reactionary to the latest leftist fad.
It's really a different way of fighting war, rather than being disadvantaged. The issue is the Leftist ideological narratives are so prevalent that people don't really see that other ways of fighting wars are workable, because they are only looking at it from a Leftist perspective.
Interesting question for geneticists: Is white skin dominant or recessive in a mixed-color mating?
I'm not sure if I'm asking the question correctly.
BLEACHED