Stadlen was born to Sir Nicholas Stadlen, a High Court judge, and Frances Stadlen in London. He is the grandson of concert pianist Peter Stadlen and Hedi Stadlen, the activist and musicologist, both Austrian jews born in Vienna
The people who own banks want us to just keep more money with them they can control, "whoopsies, just lost", manipulate the investments and stock markets to "whoops, just became valueless Monopoly money, let us take it off your hands", etc.
You yourself complained about some bank being "more feminine way" because some woman became some high position there and how you can not trust them with your money.
But the others are genuinely nice people who just want to help you, right?
Then again, you excuse men, especially Jewish men even when they publicly, obviously do fucked up shit, even on an individual basis.
Like pedophiles and such.
(I would love to hear your hot take on Liev Schreiber, that fucking disgusting piece of Satanic shit.)
A real two-year old's understanding of finance and markets shown here.
manipulate the investments and stock markets to "whoops, just became valueless Monopoly money, let us take it off your hands"
This has never happened - no bank has ever seized investments during a market crash. Are you mixing it up with how FDR seized gold?
Aside from that, the last market crashes were not caused by manipulation, they were caused by an error in how risk was calculated in their systems. In 2008, debt books based on mortgage repayments were regarded as low risk because their trade value didn't fluctuate. This meant that every institution was heavily exposed to them because "zero risk" and decent reward. When those mortgages started defaulting because they were actually a high risk default despite what the systems said, those institutions largely collapsed. Lehman Brothers were the largest casualty and Citigroup arguably should have joined them, but instead was bailed out with the Big 3 automakers and other mismanaged businesses that were destroyed in the resulting collapse.
2000's market crash was caused by overspeculation on assets based off future value, think if the whole market was made up of hype stock like GME, RIVN and PLTR. This was largely the work of retail traders enamoured with the possibilities the Internet brought.
Interesting how you assume like superhuman calculation and intentional, foaming at mouth malice when you talk about women, coupled with coordination that is basically borg-level.
But you just give the benefit of "oh, honest mistake" to people with a vested interest in the financial world going their way AND the power to make it so.
Interesting how selective you are with what's plausible and what isn't.
You also say I have an infant's intellect when it comes to finance, but you pretend you know everything when it comes to accusing women. Like when you claimed it's more likely women specially made monekypox to kill men only, than a couple gay men on an individual basis molesting kids and infecting them.
You claim the craziest, most ridiculous theories are true, and you know it for a fact, but everyone else is an idiot.
I only assume the malice, actually. I made a joke about it, calling it Impossible's Razor. Always assume malice, even if incompetence is likely.
Bankers don't make money when everything collapses, look how many missed earnings in Q1 + Q2 2022. I watch a lot of bank stocks and I think the only one that beat on EPS and revenues was Citigroup, which I didn't own, but also says that the only person doing well from everyone doing awfully happens to be a feminist.
Edit : I checked, the only other bank stock to beat on both was Standard Chartered, a UK based bank that operates mainly in Asia, which was sheltered from the Ukrainian war by the fact that those countries don't care about Ukraine.
Considering we already had one plague from a woman's laboratory in the last few years...
Then again, if the financial world collapses... in theory... who can outlast that and profit once it comes back?
The billionaires who already have billions, land, assets of every kind, who can live off of that for all their lives.
Or us, normal people?
I know you overestimate your own wealth and societal value a lot here, but you would not even be in the same ballpark as those big banker dynasties.
They lose money. Hell yes, they do. But their never lose it all. I only have this one place where I live. My one moderate car. IF I lose that, I lost what I owned.
The bankers can afford to lose BILLIONS and still stay at the top, just outlast the issues and you even buy the lie that it's an issue for them that they have to fake losses for a few years while we all get fucked over. HAH.
And you laughed with us when the celebs moaned about being locked in their mega mansions during COVID, talking about how they are doing their part and making such sacrifices. This is the same, but bigger.
I only assume the malice, actually. I made a joke about it, calling it Impossible's Razor
Ockham's razor was adopted because it worked. Impossible's razor only leads to retarded results. So why keep it? FTMs do have an obsession with razors and shaving, they think it makes them a man.
BTW, before you complain: I agree with you that it's not "DA JOOOZ". But I don't believe in blaming it on your substitute Jews, the womans, either.
This has never happened - no bank has ever seized investments during a market crash. Are you mixing it up with how FDR seized gold?
Theoretically, companies can make your stocks worthless by just emitting a trillion new stocks.
Not saying it's likely. But a lot of stuff that I thought was unlikely came to pass with such rapidity, that I don't know anymore.
Lehman Brothers were the largest casualty and Citigroup arguably should have joined them
So typical of the Matriarchy to collapse a company called Lehman BROTHERS, thereby reinforcing the notion that men are bad at their job and that they should bring in more oppressors from the Nazi gender in order to fix things up.
I've already explained this to you. Sure you have to pay a higher kosher toll to own more property, but you get property in the end which can then be passed on to your descendants. The most damaging thing you can do to globohomo is keep property out of its hands indefinitely.
Genetic dead ends like you however, will have all their assets dispersed to the system when you die. It won't stay in your family.
You could avoid this if you had a will and had some reliably non-pozzed organization to leave it but a) you've already said you don't have a will b) you are too mentally ill to do this now c) there is basically zero awareness of this in MGTOW circles because, as liberals, you have the trademark liberal main character syndrome and cannot comprehend the trite brevity of a single person's life.
you get property in the end which can then be passed on to your descendants.
About that. It sound very good. But I notice that trust fund kiddies tend to be the most repellent creatures around.
Genetic dead ends like you however, will have all their assets dispersed to the system when you die. It won't stay in your family.
There is a theory about medieval Catholic theology that claims that the church intentionally tried to weaken extended families, so more people would not have someone to pass down their property to - resulting in more stuff being bequeathed to the church. Not sure I buy it, but it's definitely good for the state if people die without children.
You could avoid this if you had a will and had some reliably non-pozzed organization to leave it but a) you've already said you don't have a will b) you are too mentally ill to do this now
Damn son.
Though I don't know if there are non-pozzed organizations. Every organization goes poz sooner or later. By the time you get to die, most likely the organization you willed it to will be poz.
there is basically zero awareness of this in MGTOW circles because, as liberals, you have the trademark liberal main character syndrome and cannot comprehend the trite brevity of a single person's life.
About that. It sound very good. But I notice that trust fund kiddies tend to be the most repellent creatures around
Not everyone that inherits property is a "trust fund kiddy." My aunt lives in her ancestral farm (3rd generation since immigrating to the US) and my extended family is anything but "trust fund kiddies."
Yes, didn't mean it like that. But those that accumulate vast fortunes and pass it down to their useless offspring aren't doing their children any favor.
No you dont. You literally just say, "Oh look, a female in a powerful position!" or "someone in a powerful position said 'More Feminine Way'!" and call it a day
The Imp is unfamiliar with the notion of pandering. If his fixation were on race rather than gender, he'd be telling us all how society is structured to benefit blacks - regardless of the fact that 99% of blacks don't benefit from all that nonsense.
The dolphins want us to kill ourselves and be miserable for their amusement. This proves that all things are evidence of the massive dolphin conspiracy.
Yes when you cast a net that wide, and ignore literally any basic sense contrary, anything can follow the same logic and motives.
Oh, yes, we should do it like big good equality China. Force women to have abortions if they exceed their baby quota and take photos with the aborted fetus next to them in bed to use to shame them.
I bet this fuckface thinks China is great.
Also, another case of "too many people in the world". No, too many useless third worlders being kept afloat by them gibz. The world is not overpopulated because a white couple has 3 kids in Oklahoma. It is "overpopulated" when African couples who have zero anything just sit around and have 15 kids who grow up and do the same because libtards like this demand we send them money.
Of course he would say those Asians and Africans don't harm LE ENVIRONMENT, but it's funny how he ignores the fact that those adorable monkeys and elephants are not killed off because of my Eastern European ass. It's Africans killing them so Chinese can buy their body parts to cure their impotence.
EDIT: He says he is "half-Jewish", but his loyalties are obvious.
"The world is burning." People were having lots of children during much more dangerous periods of history. In fact, perilous times are the best times to have 'em, as a hedge against industrial scale death, something we're not seeing yet in 2022.
He has never answered the question of how we continue to have a future if every single ability to have children is either women's ploy, tradcon cuckery, or both.
Which, among many things, is proof that he has no solutions. He just wants to be mad.
Zero fucking consistency.
The people who own banks want us to just keep more money with them they can control, "whoopsies, just lost", manipulate the investments and stock markets to "whoops, just became valueless Monopoly money, let us take it off your hands", etc.
You yourself complained about some bank being "more feminine way" because some woman became some high position there and how you can not trust them with your money.
But the others are genuinely nice people who just want to help you, right?
Then again, you excuse men, especially Jewish men even when they publicly, obviously do fucked up shit, even on an individual basis.
Like pedophiles and such.
(I would love to hear your hot take on Liev Schreiber, that fucking disgusting piece of Satanic shit.)
desire to know more intensifies
I am not going into details. Just google him and his son.
Ray Donovan? reads Oh no...well, wait...what did I expect?
A real two-year old's understanding of finance and markets shown here.
This has never happened - no bank has ever seized investments during a market crash. Are you mixing it up with how FDR seized gold?
Aside from that, the last market crashes were not caused by manipulation, they were caused by an error in how risk was calculated in their systems. In 2008, debt books based on mortgage repayments were regarded as low risk because their trade value didn't fluctuate. This meant that every institution was heavily exposed to them because "zero risk" and decent reward. When those mortgages started defaulting because they were actually a high risk default despite what the systems said, those institutions largely collapsed. Lehman Brothers were the largest casualty and Citigroup arguably should have joined them, but instead was bailed out with the Big 3 automakers and other mismanaged businesses that were destroyed in the resulting collapse.
2000's market crash was caused by overspeculation on assets based off future value, think if the whole market was made up of hype stock like GME, RIVN and PLTR. This was largely the work of retail traders enamoured with the possibilities the Internet brought.
Interesting how you assume like superhuman calculation and intentional, foaming at mouth malice when you talk about women, coupled with coordination that is basically borg-level.
But you just give the benefit of "oh, honest mistake" to people with a vested interest in the financial world going their way AND the power to make it so.
Interesting how selective you are with what's plausible and what isn't.
You also say I have an infant's intellect when it comes to finance, but you pretend you know everything when it comes to accusing women. Like when you claimed it's more likely women specially made monekypox to kill men only, than a couple gay men on an individual basis molesting kids and infecting them.
You claim the craziest, most ridiculous theories are true, and you know it for a fact, but everyone else is an idiot.
I only assume the malice, actually. I made a joke about it, calling it Impossible's Razor. Always assume malice, even if incompetence is likely.
Bankers don't make money when everything collapses, look how many missed earnings in Q1 + Q2 2022. I watch a lot of bank stocks and I think the only one that beat on EPS and revenues was Citigroup, which I didn't own, but also says that the only person doing well from everyone doing awfully happens to be a feminist.
Edit : I checked, the only other bank stock to beat on both was Standard Chartered, a UK based bank that operates mainly in Asia, which was sheltered from the Ukrainian war by the fact that those countries don't care about Ukraine.
Considering we already had one plague from a woman's laboratory in the last few years...
Then again, if the financial world collapses... in theory... who can outlast that and profit once it comes back?
The billionaires who already have billions, land, assets of every kind, who can live off of that for all their lives.
Or us, normal people?
I know you overestimate your own wealth and societal value a lot here, but you would not even be in the same ballpark as those big banker dynasties.
They lose money. Hell yes, they do. But their never lose it all. I only have this one place where I live. My one moderate car. IF I lose that, I lost what I owned.
The bankers can afford to lose BILLIONS and still stay at the top, just outlast the issues and you even buy the lie that it's an issue for them that they have to fake losses for a few years while we all get fucked over. HAH.
And you laughed with us when the celebs moaned about being locked in their mega mansions during COVID, talking about how they are doing their part and making such sacrifices. This is the same, but bigger.
Easy now, some of those pampered, privileged, pompous pretenders have penises, and are above reproach.
Ockham's razor was adopted because it worked. Impossible's razor only leads to retarded results. So why keep it? FTMs do have an obsession with razors and shaving, they think it makes them a man.
BTW, before you complain: I agree with you that it's not "DA JOOOZ". But I don't believe in blaming it on your substitute Jews, the womans, either.
Theoretically, companies can make your stocks worthless by just emitting a trillion new stocks.
Not saying it's likely. But a lot of stuff that I thought was unlikely came to pass with such rapidity, that I don't know anymore.
So typical of the Matriarchy to collapse a company called Lehman BROTHERS, thereby reinforcing the notion that men are bad at their job and that they should bring in more oppressors from the Nazi gender in order to fix things up.
They seized money multiple times for example cyprus and Italy
I've already explained this to you. Sure you have to pay a higher kosher toll to own more property, but you get property in the end which can then be passed on to your descendants. The most damaging thing you can do to globohomo is keep property out of its hands indefinitely.
Genetic dead ends like you however, will have all their assets dispersed to the system when you die. It won't stay in your family.
You could avoid this if you had a will and had some reliably non-pozzed organization to leave it but a) you've already said you don't have a will b) you are too mentally ill to do this now c) there is basically zero awareness of this in MGTOW circles because, as liberals, you have the trademark liberal main character syndrome and cannot comprehend the trite brevity of a single person's life.
About that. It sound very good. But I notice that trust fund kiddies tend to be the most repellent creatures around.
There is a theory about medieval Catholic theology that claims that the church intentionally tried to weaken extended families, so more people would not have someone to pass down their property to - resulting in more stuff being bequeathed to the church. Not sure I buy it, but it's definitely good for the state if people die without children.
Damn son.
Though I don't know if there are non-pozzed organizations. Every organization goes poz sooner or later. By the time you get to die, most likely the organization you willed it to will be poz.
Damn.
Not everyone that inherits property is a "trust fund kiddy." My aunt lives in her ancestral farm (3rd generation since immigrating to the US) and my extended family is anything but "trust fund kiddies."
Yes, didn't mean it like that. But those that accumulate vast fortunes and pass it down to their useless offspring aren't doing their children any favor.
Unless they have Hunter Biden as a role model.
Just goes to show how fucked things are when inheriting a house means you're a trust fund kiddy lmao
This is literally the exact same amount of proof that you ever give for your female conspiracies.
Except I show a clear motive and they all follow the same logic, that feminists want to reduce the male population and will do anything to achieve it.
No you dont. You literally just say, "Oh look, a female in a powerful position!" or "someone in a powerful position said 'More Feminine Way'!" and call it a day
The Imp is unfamiliar with the notion of pandering. If his fixation were on race rather than gender, he'd be telling us all how society is structured to benefit blacks - regardless of the fact that 99% of blacks don't benefit from all that nonsense.
Feminists or women? I never did figure out if you think the Gearheart agenda is specifically feminist or just something all women want.
It's something all feminists want, but because feminism is an ideology of hiding your true intent, any woman in power could be supporting it.
Yes when you cast a net that wide, and ignore literally any basic sense contrary, anything can follow the same logic and motives.
What is the motive for this plot of yours to kill 90% of men?
To improve the dating market for the men who remain?
To make sure that, in your words, they cannot leech off men anymore?
They hate us. Just like Hitler hated Jews. They believe men are the root of all evil.
Yeah, the antisemitic inconsistency is much worse than yours. Totes.
Oh, yes, we should do it like big good equality China. Force women to have abortions if they exceed their baby quota and take photos with the aborted fetus next to them in bed to use to shame them.
I bet this fuckface thinks China is great.
Also, another case of "too many people in the world". No, too many useless third worlders being kept afloat by them gibz. The world is not overpopulated because a white couple has 3 kids in Oklahoma. It is "overpopulated" when African couples who have zero anything just sit around and have 15 kids who grow up and do the same because libtards like this demand we send them money.
Of course he would say those Asians and Africans don't harm LE ENVIRONMENT, but it's funny how he ignores the fact that those adorable monkeys and elephants are not killed off because of my Eastern European ass. It's Africans killing them so Chinese can buy their body parts to cure their impotence.
EDIT: He says he is "half-Jewish", but his loyalties are obvious.
Why don’t you start with Africa and China, kike?
Indians Bollywood dance into chat.
What an absolutely narcissistic doom-fag.
"The world is burning." People were having lots of children during much more dangerous periods of history. In fact, perilous times are the best times to have 'em, as a hedge against industrial scale death, something we're not seeing yet in 2022.
He probably can't get it up anyway. Sour grapes.
Methinks the only thing this man has a chance of conceiving is a giant turd. Perhaps a monkeypox infection.
Right . . . SORE grapes (Haw Haw!)
if you're so fucking worried about the planet, kill yourself. you will be doing the planet a service.
oh, are you too important to be the change you want others to be?
Except
illegal aliensillegal immigrantspoor migrantsdreamersrefugees, of course.Archives for this post:
link - archive.org - archive.today
What a racist!
Haha, tradcons are getting hit from the left.
But of course, it's different when they want to impose penalties on people with none.
Yes? The point of penalizing is to discourage harmful behaviors and encourage good ones.
Exactly, and nothing is more harmful than continuing to enable women's ego.
People who keep propping them up when society desperately needs them kicked down should be punished.
TIL a next generation "enables women's ego".
They're far more fragile and insecure than even you are, dummy.
He has never answered the question of how we continue to have a future if every single ability to have children is either women's ploy, tradcon cuckery, or both.
Which, among many things, is proof that he has no solutions. He just wants to be mad.
When have they not been hit from the left? At this point, those strikes should be slapping against a hard callous.