What a chode
(media.scored.co)
Comments (36)
sorted by:
When I think "Stalin's crimes", gotta say, ephebophelia wasn't exactly on the top of my complaint list. Like yeah, sure, it's bad, but the lack of consent was a bit worse... And even that's still fucking minor (pun not intended) compared to the whole "10 million genocided" thing.
I've never seen a whataboutism in regards to the same person being criticized. That's how bad Stalin was.
ackshully it's ephebophillia!!
God i hate that shit so much. no, you're not an ephfttpebophile, you're just a chomo, fuck do we need to take language back.
Believe it or not, being attracted to 7 year olds and fucking them is morally distinguishable and should probably be classified differently than being attracted to 14 year olds and fucking them. That isn't an instance where leftist linguistic propaganda corrupts the language; that's a word with actual meaning being used in place of a word with a meaning that is similar but does not apply.
We can agree that both are bad, but of all the countless fronts to wage war on in the fight against linguistic propaganda, this isn't one of them.
Agreed. Words have power. That's why the Left tries to pervert them so often and so much. Additional clarity and granularity without muddying any other words' definitions by consequence is really only a net benefit. Just because the words "homicide" and "fratricide" both exist doesn't mean one somehow invalidates the other's severity, it only clarifies what is going on.
I suppose they are distinguishable, in the sense that possessing child porn and distributing child porn shouldn't be treated exactly the same, nor the same as raping a child. But morally... you're still going to have a seat with Chris Hansen.
Also it would depend on the 14 year old and how old the man is. I have seen some very mature 14 year olds but it's rare. Still, can't you wait a few fucking years?
Not pedo; just a perv. not to be that guy, but if you can impregnate her she's a woman. Which doesn't make it right. But it does make it not pedophilia. If it does, then we all come from a long line of pedophiles.
Yeah and no birth control + no abortion + no tolerance meant that if a girl screwed around and (likely) got pregnant, your whole family had a big problem. Well, at least if it happened, they were getting married now. Also, people didn't use to live that long -- need to live long enough to raise their kids. IDK exactly what the ideal age for pregnancy is in nature to ensure live births and lower maternal mortality, but it's not 30+. Getting going on reproduction was vital to survival. As usual, applying modern moral standards to ancient behavior is dumb.
But this topic isn't about that. I don't know why the guy you're replying to took it there, or why you insisted on applying ancient behavior standards (or even biological qualifiers if you're just saying "hey technically the term doesn't apply here") to Stalin's behavior.
the average marrying age in ye olde medieval times was around 20-22 and mainly if not almost always with other 20-22 year-olds
i do not care what lies you pull out nor do i care about "she was 17 and 11 months you sick fuck", if you cannot keep your dick in your pants and try to grab at dumb girls when you're 30 and losing it i will bash your head in same as the guy trying to touch babies.
Even if that were the case they mostly married people around their own age. Not massively older.
not true. Men tended to marry around 20, sometimes later, when they had established the means to support a family. at least in more eastern areas. The Western European pattern that has held true for ages is that men and women of roughly equal ages married around 20/25 (F/M) whereas in Eastern Europe and the rest of the planet, the marriage age was more like 15/25 (F/M).
yes it does. Cause Stalin was massively older
You realize the youngest person to ever get pregnant was 5
Edit: why are people downvoting me for this? holy shit are you that desperate to call children women?. fucking pedos
Then by that definition that 5 year old is a woman. Not sure what the issue people are having with the comment here, as opposed to the prior "not a pedo!" comment.
What the fuck, how? Jesus.
It was higher last time I read a Guiness book of world records, but I believe you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Medina#:~:text=Lina%20Marcela%20Medina%20de%20Jurado,seven%20months%2C%20and%2021%20days.
No.
11 year olds are not women.
Wow based and rational pilled.
That's some Snopes-level fact checking.
UnVeRiFiAbLe vErAcItY!!
I mean, as far as this shit goes, there's worse things to point out that he did than fuck (well, rape...) a 14 year old and knock her up.
Yeah, but people only care about the government of Russia killing Ukrainians if CNN tells them to.
No one is saying this is the worst thing he's done.
If anything, the post is mocking the guy who draws a line at 13/14.
It's weird to say a political faction is neutered by talking more about political issues than pop culture.
c/TheDonald
Yeah, I find it funny that some twat supporting a 90s democrat is going to talk about "diluting right wing forums", as if they aren't the exact same establishment shills, just so long as it has their figurehead in the seat pushing the same politics only slower.
All the dude does is post suppprt of left wing shit but you think he's right wing
I'm ok that OnlyFans is pornographic, I'm not ok that it basically takes advantage of lonely guys who mostly have mental issues or are in a bad head space due to extreme loneliness. OnlyFans is a terrible deal and legalized prostitution would help kill it, and legalized prostitution would be a great deal for those lonely guys.
As for Abortion, I'm not pro-life or pro-choice but I hate feminists and abortion being illegal triggers the fuck out of them so I am very happy with the overturning of Roe VS Wade. (Shouldn't have messed with my video games cunts!)
This is sticking it to SJWs, Trump-style.