So why all the trouble with guns? Why does a logic universally accepted regarding the First Amendment completely fall apart when we get to the Second? The harm to children from guns far exceeds the harm done by child pornography.
How retarded do you have to be to say this? Every child dead in a gun-related incident is listen and brought up by power hungry leftoids.
How do you know how much harm is done by child porn? How do you know that? Do you know all child pornographers, Neil? Do you? Or all the children trafficked in from fucking Mexico, which I am sure this dirtbag supports, claiming "no human is illegal, UWU".
God, I am so angry when someone is so maliciously, willfully retarded.
Hah! It's this guy! a dumbass reporter who tried to buy a gun to prove how easy it is to buy a gun in America only to get denied because of past history drug use and domestic abuse.
That is amazing. The background check he claims doesn't take place worked and he still had the gall to blame it on the fact that hes a "journalist." Get absolutely fucked, Steinberg. And stay away from children.
Also I laughed at his imagined interaction with the neighbor. "He's afraid" I really don't think journos understand how out of touch and retarded they are.
Check the man's basement for small children. I'm not even joking, I genuinely believe it.
Also, if you're willing to do anything to prevent kids being shot, how about returning control of the high schools to men, because shootings have exponentially increased since women started being the majority.
His analogy would be to restrict ownership of recording devices like cameras only to government agents or government-approved organizations, since cameras "cause" the harm, the same way guns "cause" the harm. Start saying that he wanted Floyd to die in obscurity because he wants to ban citizen journalism and photography.
When your best argument against guns is child pornography its time to re-evaluate your moral trajectory. If your conclusion is that we allow porn under the first amendment yet prevent child porn, you should logically conclude that all forms of pornography are socially unredeemable and harmful acts and pornography should be considered unprotected speech. Neither have any merit.
Guns are entirely different. Countless lives have been saved by guns despite the fact that many guns are also used to kill the innocent. It comes down to the hand the gun falls into. Thats a people problem not a gun problem.
You can't say the same for pornography of any kind. Pornography is inherently detrimental in its use. It offers no benefit, has no upside to counter its potential for harm.
People are also harmed in manufacturing porn. You can manufacture firearms all day long and literally nothing will happen to you.
Because the creation of one explicitly involves the abuse of children and the creation of the other does not. A more apt comparison would be cameras to guns because both can be used to do great harm to children after production, but we know these people aren't here for good faith debate.
Firs tof all, Steinberg. Cool.
Second
How retarded do you have to be to say this? Every child dead in a gun-related incident is listen and brought up by power hungry leftoids.
How do you know how much harm is done by child porn? How do you know that? Do you know all child pornographers, Neil? Do you? Or all the children trafficked in from fucking Mexico, which I am sure this dirtbag supports, claiming "no human is illegal, UWU".
God, I am so angry when someone is so maliciously, willfully retarded.
Every. Single. Time.
Hey! It's not every time! Sometimes it's an employee Just Following Orders from up above, which is every time!
Hah! It's this guy! a dumbass reporter who tried to buy a gun to prove how easy it is to buy a gun in America only to get denied because of past history drug use and domestic abuse.
Archive of article going into details
Just a butthurt bitch with anger issues (among other issues) who's big mad that he can't own guns like normal people.
That is amazing. The background check he claims doesn't take place worked and he still had the gall to blame it on the fact that hes a "journalist." Get absolutely fucked, Steinberg. And stay away from children.
Also I laughed at his imagined interaction with the neighbor. "He's afraid" I really don't think journos understand how out of touch and retarded they are.
Oh, man. I am absolutely delighted someone else remembers the drunken wife beaters attempt to buy a gun…
Because then you'd have nothing to shoot the pedos with.
Just ask Saint Kyle about that.
Check the man's basement for small children. I'm not even joking, I genuinely believe it.
Also, if you're willing to do anything to prevent kids being shot, how about returning control of the high schools to men, because shootings have exponentially increased since women started being the majority.
That should be standard procedure for any male feminist.
every single time
And he was right.
The notion that he was endangering the US is also completely bullshit.
Because we say so and we have guns.
When you bring up child porn like this I immediately assume you're a subhuman pedophile fuck that needs dealing with
His analogy would be to restrict ownership of recording devices like cameras only to government agents or government-approved organizations, since cameras "cause" the harm, the same way guns "cause" the harm. Start saying that he wanted Floyd to die in obscurity because he wants to ban citizen journalism and photography.
Weird flex.
If the FBI ever goes back to arresting child predators instead of protecting them this dude needs to be on "the list".
He’s already on the FBI’s list.
Of allies.
2020 NCMEC - Reports of children exploited for child pornography: 21.7 million World wide, 1.1 million hosted in the US.
2020 CDC - Children's under 19, deaths from gun related injuries: 4.3k US.
A gun grabber is whining about kiddy porn being outlawed. It must be a day that ends in y.
When your best argument against guns is child pornography its time to re-evaluate your moral trajectory. If your conclusion is that we allow porn under the first amendment yet prevent child porn, you should logically conclude that all forms of pornography are socially unredeemable and harmful acts and pornography should be considered unprotected speech. Neither have any merit.
Guns are entirely different. Countless lives have been saved by guns despite the fact that many guns are also used to kill the innocent. It comes down to the hand the gun falls into. Thats a people problem not a gun problem.
You can't say the same for pornography of any kind. Pornography is inherently detrimental in its use. It offers no benefit, has no upside to counter its potential for harm.
People are also harmed in manufacturing porn. You can manufacture firearms all day long and literally nothing will happen to you.
Why not just restrict people named "Steinberg" from holding public office, owning pets, or owning property?
Guns aren't restricted in Chicago. Sure thing dude.
Child porn is bad. Guns are good. Well, that was an easy one to answer.
Chicago...yep. Checks out.
Steinberg
Because the creation of one explicitly involves the abuse of children and the creation of the other does not. A more apt comparison would be cameras to guns because both can be used to do great harm to children after production, but we know these people aren't here for good faith debate.
get out of my country.