The part that worries me is that I will have to be doing it from both sides.
I will be having to slap young Leftist saying how the mayo monkeys are all spawn of Satan, and them not having the self awareness to realize they are basically saying everything Hitler ever said but with the races swapped.
But there has been a growing trend of a lot of younger Right-wingers who are seeming to decide that if they are going to be called White Supremacist, then they may as well become them. And they just get angry when I point out that culturally and politically, they have far more in common with the Hispanics living in Dodge City than they do with the White Yuppies and Marxist living in Lawrence and Overland Park.
There are virtually no white supremacists. There are whites who believe in white dignity, the right to white solidarity and white representation in government, white communities and white survival, and ethnically homogeneous white nations - and literally none of that is “supremacist”. Opposing the genocide of your peoples via replacement migration and anti-white government policy is, likewise, not “supremacist”.
Spare me. There are absolutely white supremacists who genuinely believe whites are inherently biologically superior to all other races. It's just wildly unpalatable to say the crazy shit that Spencer was saying in his supervillain rant at Charlottesville, because people are already pre-disposed to opposing it.
Also, having white racial affinity is a joke when you still have to side with white Leftists by definition.
He said there are virtually no white supremacists, and he's absolutely correct. White people, as a collective, are by far the most welcome, xenophilic, tolerant race on the planet. It's not even close. If white people acted like non-white people, there would be no non-white people in power in white countries.
The fact that maybe one in a hundred white people hate non-whites as much as non-whites hate them does not make white supremacy a problem, or even something worth discussing.
We're not talking in over-arching averages. We're talking specifically about right-wing racist whites, which is already a small strata.
Of that already small category, there are definitely white supremacists, and it's fucking weird for you all to try and deny it, when I get to watch idiots come on this board and basically announce they are white supremacists in all but name.
You generally put up really good arguments. Disappointing to see this level of dishonesty and weasel-wording from you, and then to see you defend it repeatedly is, quite honestly, mind boggling.
Oh no, concern trolling, better say the right things so my fans won't be mad at me and unsubscribe.
A) This isn't weasel-wording. I'm using his scope, and it didn't change. The weasel-wording is by people who come here and scream at the top of their lungs that blacks, jews, indians, gays, asians, arabs, and white people that don't agree with them are sub-human scum that deserve total extermination for their inherent racial (and therefore social) inferiority aren't white supremacists. They are, they know that, they're just liars attempting to hide their power level before you trigger them and get them to scream "gas the kikes".
Yes, the elites are the enemy of every race, every creed, and both genders.
I think it might be a good development if some right-wingers do become white supremacists. Not because that is good in itself, but because it expands the Overton Window. People have forgotten what 'white supremacy' actually is, which is why everyone and his dog gets called that.
Yeah, the EthnoNats do not want to accept that everyone is replacable to the Globalists.
I've often said that argument for "Black Replacement" is even stronger than any of the arguments for "White Replacement" given the effects of what has happened to black family units under not only Leftism, but Leftist Racialism / National Socialism over the past several decades: cultural degeneracy, cultural institutionalization of crime, complete social failure, runaway abortion, total collapse of the family unit, eradication of community, paranoid conspiratorial thinking as the norm, rampant poverty, total economic dependency on the government. It's actually lead to American blacks becoming the 2nd largest minority for the first time in American history. The reason Trump won more black support is because when he shut down illegal immigration, it benefited working class blacks immediately, because it was their jobs that were being outsourced to illegal labor even more than whites. The fact that black v. latino gang-wars have been a staple of Democratic hive cities near the southern border is not a surprise.
And this isn't the first time this kind of thing has happened. Arguably, the Democrats actually did this to asians in California after WW2. People forget, when the American japanese were evicted from their homes and placed in camps, they didn't get to keep their homes. Their homes were seized by the government and sold to black families who were moved into the state. FDR literally replaced asians with blacks in California because it secured more votes for Democrats, and many blacks were shifting their votes from Republican to Democrat because of it.
I shouldn't have to explain how Natives were replaced.
I shouldn't have to explain that it's not only whites, and it's genuinely everyone who isn't useful. That makes sense from a globalist perspective: they really don't see any difference between one group and another.
They might be getting angry because your arguments are bad. Them being similar doesn't magically make those Hispanics suddenly less illegal, nor their effects on the economy acceptable.
You should add your third side of convincing those Hispanics (and all other groups) to also throw down their tribe to become one with the White. Because they will still prioritize themselves over others, like anyone reasonable would. Yet you are still trying to convince the Whites that they alone can't do that, because for some reason that's bad.
suddenly less illegal, nor their effects on the economy acceptable.
The hell are you talking about? They have lived there for almost 150 years. Their ancestors where cowboys who came up from Mexico and Texas on the cattle drives and then stayed here. The ranches they own have been handed down through generations. And they are quite proud of that heritage, and are some of the most flag waving patriotic people I know. As well as one of the most conservative parts of the state. Incidentally, Also some of the most hardcore border hawks.
to also throw down their tribe to become one with the White.
Well you are in luck then. Because recent voting and census trends have show Hispanics starting to either identify as White, or vote with Whites on political issues. Only in California is that trend not happening, but both Texas and Florida have gone hard to the Right because of shifts in Hispanic voting. Because Hispanic actually are starting to become more like past immigrant waves (Germans, Irish, Italians, etc) where they keep some of their culture but otherwise integrate.
I lived in Kansas until moving to Texas recently. The "Hispanics in Dodge City" that you said we should have so much in common with?
Those are straight up illegal aliens bro, the vast majority of them. Ditto the town of Liberal. Garden City too, which is where most of the fake money in the Midwest comes from if you weren't aware.
They are a plague on this state. Every bit as much the enemy as the white leftists.
Because recent voting and census trends have show Hispanics starting to either identify as White, or vote with Whites on political issues
If only the Hispanics that people actually hated were voting, or were allowed to vote without being bussed around by the Democrats to only vote for them. I'm certain that smaller minority of HIspanic voters will suddenly balance out the issues with the illegal population.
And I'm absolutely certain they won't have a massive bias on that specific issue either, that will effect many of them's personal family members (and many of their direct parents too).
I'm glad for the ones who came here and settled a good land. Those are such a nonissue they don't even factor into anyone's discussion of the problem. Acting like they do is deliberately misreading the issue.
But there has been a growing trend of a lot of younger Right-wingers who are seeming to decide that if they are going to be called White Supremacist, then they may as well become them.
Yeah. I think there's a lot of value in the pro-white arguments (or more specifically the anti-anti-white arguments), and it needs to be said, but I'm still very worried about the pendulum swing. We (rightly) mocked when the left called everything and everyone a Nazi for years, but it might end up being self fulfilling in the end. This leftist societal decay is exactly how you get actual conservative/right-wing authoritarianism.
And as fun as it is to LARP and say they'd deserve it, I don't think that's the ideal path for society to go down. If the pendulum does swing hard, it's going to be very rough for everyone.
Leftists still need to be stopped, but people need to pay attention to the warnings of history too.
From a strategic perspective you are right, people in America would be better served by alliances with groups that can help them promote their values instead of putting themselves in ethnic bubbles.
I don't really like how racism has come to be framed as a moral issue though. It shouldn't be an issue at all except within integrated cultures like the US, and only then as a matter of necessity/practicality.
It shouldn't be seen as an issue at all. This is a country based on Liberal Revolutions. Race is such a distant abstract that it's less relevant than religion in deciding whether someone is capable of integrating effectively into an American society.
Except that the elites/cabal passed the immigration act of 1965 from majority white countries to majority non-white, the Founding Fathers set up the United States as a white Christian ethnostate, and the globalists are intent upon carrying out the Kalergi plan, to literally replace and genocide white people in our own countries, and have said as much for over 100 years, the exact same people who have been promoting open borders, mass non-white immigration, diversity, multiculturalism, anti-white rhetoric and policies, affirmative action, globalist NGOs literally transporting non-whites into white countries, and attacking any white person that speaks out against this as a literal Nazi. These same sick bastards also proclaim that the Kalergi plan is a conspiracy theory pushed by white supremacists, while simultaneously tracking the decline of the white population with glee, saying that they look forward to whites becoming a minority, that it's inevitable, and that we deserve it.
First, the Hart-Celler act was passed by whites so that the Democrats could get more votes.
Second, the Founding Fathers set up the US as a Liberal Republic. Even in 1789, the US could not be considered an ethno-state, and wasn't considered an ethno-state even by the founders themselves. "White" isn't an ethnicity. Anglo, "Scott", "Irish", "Italian", "Spanish", "Portuguese" are ethnicities. And the Americans before the civil war would have found what they saw as ethnic differences between "Pennsylvanian" and "Virginian".
This Pan-European White Solidarity is a progressive racial concept that has more in common with Mr. Kalergi than it does George Washington.
This isn't about you, it isn't about race, it's about simple power.
The part that worries me is that I will have to be doing it from both sides.
I will be having to slap young Leftist saying how the mayo monkeys are all spawn of Satan, and them not having the self awareness to realize they are basically saying everything Hitler ever said but with the races swapped.
But there has been a growing trend of a lot of younger Right-wingers who are seeming to decide that if they are going to be called White Supremacist, then they may as well become them. And they just get angry when I point out that culturally and politically, they have far more in common with the Hispanics living in Dodge City than they do with the White Yuppies and Marxist living in Lawrence and Overland Park.
There are virtually no white supremacists. There are whites who believe in white dignity, the right to white solidarity and white representation in government, white communities and white survival, and ethnically homogeneous white nations - and literally none of that is “supremacist”. Opposing the genocide of your peoples via replacement migration and anti-white government policy is, likewise, not “supremacist”.
Spare me. There are absolutely white supremacists who genuinely believe whites are inherently biologically superior to all other races. It's just wildly unpalatable to say the crazy shit that Spencer was saying in his supervillain rant at Charlottesville, because people are already pre-disposed to opposing it.
Also, having white racial affinity is a joke when you still have to side with white Leftists by definition.
He said there are virtually no white supremacists, and he's absolutely correct. White people, as a collective, are by far the most welcome, xenophilic, tolerant race on the planet. It's not even close. If white people acted like non-white people, there would be no non-white people in power in white countries.
The fact that maybe one in a hundred white people hate non-whites as much as non-whites hate them does not make white supremacy a problem, or even something worth discussing.
We're not talking in over-arching averages. We're talking specifically about right-wing racist whites, which is already a small strata.
Of that already small category, there are definitely white supremacists, and it's fucking weird for you all to try and deny it, when I get to watch idiots come on this board and basically announce they are white supremacists in all but name.
You generally put up really good arguments. Disappointing to see this level of dishonesty and weasel-wording from you, and then to see you defend it repeatedly is, quite honestly, mind boggling.
Oh no, concern trolling, better say the right things so my fans won't be mad at me and unsubscribe.
A) This isn't weasel-wording. I'm using his scope, and it didn't change. The weasel-wording is by people who come here and scream at the top of their lungs that blacks, jews, indians, gays, asians, arabs, and white people that don't agree with them are sub-human scum that deserve total extermination for their inherent racial (and therefore social) inferiority aren't white supremacists. They are, they know that, they're just liars attempting to hide their power level before you trigger them and get them to scream "gas the kikes".
B) I reserve the god given right to be wrong.
Yes, the elites are the enemy of every race, every creed, and both genders.
I think it might be a good development if some right-wingers do become white supremacists. Not because that is good in itself, but because it expands the Overton Window. People have forgotten what 'white supremacy' actually is, which is why everyone and his dog gets called that.
Yeah, the EthnoNats do not want to accept that everyone is replacable to the Globalists.
I've often said that argument for "Black Replacement" is even stronger than any of the arguments for "White Replacement" given the effects of what has happened to black family units under not only Leftism, but Leftist Racialism / National Socialism over the past several decades: cultural degeneracy, cultural institutionalization of crime, complete social failure, runaway abortion, total collapse of the family unit, eradication of community, paranoid conspiratorial thinking as the norm, rampant poverty, total economic dependency on the government. It's actually lead to American blacks becoming the 2nd largest minority for the first time in American history. The reason Trump won more black support is because when he shut down illegal immigration, it benefited working class blacks immediately, because it was their jobs that were being outsourced to illegal labor even more than whites. The fact that black v. latino gang-wars have been a staple of Democratic hive cities near the southern border is not a surprise.
And this isn't the first time this kind of thing has happened. Arguably, the Democrats actually did this to asians in California after WW2. People forget, when the American japanese were evicted from their homes and placed in camps, they didn't get to keep their homes. Their homes were seized by the government and sold to black families who were moved into the state. FDR literally replaced asians with blacks in California because it secured more votes for Democrats, and many blacks were shifting their votes from Republican to Democrat because of it.
I shouldn't have to explain how Natives were replaced.
I shouldn't have to explain that it's not only whites, and it's genuinely everyone who isn't useful. That makes sense from a globalist perspective: they really don't see any difference between one group and another.
Damn son 👍
Thanks
They might be getting angry because your arguments are bad. Them being similar doesn't magically make those Hispanics suddenly less illegal, nor their effects on the economy acceptable.
You should add your third side of convincing those Hispanics (and all other groups) to also throw down their tribe to become one with the White. Because they will still prioritize themselves over others, like anyone reasonable would. Yet you are still trying to convince the Whites that they alone can't do that, because for some reason that's bad.
The hell are you talking about? They have lived there for almost 150 years. Their ancestors where cowboys who came up from Mexico and Texas on the cattle drives and then stayed here. The ranches they own have been handed down through generations. And they are quite proud of that heritage, and are some of the most flag waving patriotic people I know. As well as one of the most conservative parts of the state. Incidentally, Also some of the most hardcore border hawks.
Well you are in luck then. Because recent voting and census trends have show Hispanics starting to either identify as White, or vote with Whites on political issues. Only in California is that trend not happening, but both Texas and Florida have gone hard to the Right because of shifts in Hispanic voting. Because Hispanic actually are starting to become more like past immigrant waves (Germans, Irish, Italians, etc) where they keep some of their culture but otherwise integrate.
I lived in Kansas until moving to Texas recently. The "Hispanics in Dodge City" that you said we should have so much in common with?
Those are straight up illegal aliens bro, the vast majority of them. Ditto the town of Liberal. Garden City too, which is where most of the fake money in the Midwest comes from if you weren't aware.
They are a plague on this state. Every bit as much the enemy as the white leftists.
If only the Hispanics that people actually hated were voting, or were allowed to vote without being bussed around by the Democrats to only vote for them. I'm certain that smaller minority of HIspanic voters will suddenly balance out the issues with the illegal population.
And I'm absolutely certain they won't have a massive bias on that specific issue either, that will effect many of them's personal family members (and many of their direct parents too).
I'm glad for the ones who came here and settled a good land. Those are such a nonissue they don't even factor into anyone's discussion of the problem. Acting like they do is deliberately misreading the issue.
Yeah. I think there's a lot of value in the pro-white arguments (or more specifically the anti-anti-white arguments), and it needs to be said, but I'm still very worried about the pendulum swing. We (rightly) mocked when the left called everything and everyone a Nazi for years, but it might end up being self fulfilling in the end. This leftist societal decay is exactly how you get actual conservative/right-wing authoritarianism.
And as fun as it is to LARP and say they'd deserve it, I don't think that's the ideal path for society to go down. If the pendulum does swing hard, it's going to be very rough for everyone.
Leftists still need to be stopped, but people need to pay attention to the warnings of history too.
From a strategic perspective you are right, people in America would be better served by alliances with groups that can help them promote their values instead of putting themselves in ethnic bubbles.
I don't really like how racism has come to be framed as a moral issue though. It shouldn't be an issue at all except within integrated cultures like the US, and only then as a matter of necessity/practicality.
It shouldn't be seen as an issue at all. This is a country based on Liberal Revolutions. Race is such a distant abstract that it's less relevant than religion in deciding whether someone is capable of integrating effectively into an American society.
Except that the elites/cabal passed the immigration act of 1965 from majority white countries to majority non-white, the Founding Fathers set up the United States as a white Christian ethnostate, and the globalists are intent upon carrying out the Kalergi plan, to literally replace and genocide white people in our own countries, and have said as much for over 100 years, the exact same people who have been promoting open borders, mass non-white immigration, diversity, multiculturalism, anti-white rhetoric and policies, affirmative action, globalist NGOs literally transporting non-whites into white countries, and attacking any white person that speaks out against this as a literal Nazi. These same sick bastards also proclaim that the Kalergi plan is a conspiracy theory pushed by white supremacists, while simultaneously tracking the decline of the white population with glee, saying that they look forward to whites becoming a minority, that it's inevitable, and that we deserve it.
First, the Hart-Celler act was passed by whites so that the Democrats could get more votes.
Second, the Founding Fathers set up the US as a Liberal Republic. Even in 1789, the US could not be considered an ethno-state, and wasn't considered an ethno-state even by the founders themselves. "White" isn't an ethnicity. Anglo, "Scott", "Irish", "Italian", "Spanish", "Portuguese" are ethnicities. And the Americans before the civil war would have found what they saw as ethnic differences between "Pennsylvanian" and "Virginian".
This Pan-European White Solidarity is a progressive racial concept that has more in common with Mr. Kalergi than it does George Washington.
This isn't about you, it isn't about race, it's about simple power.