From a strategic perspective you are right, people in America would be better served by alliances with groups that can help them promote their values instead of putting themselves in ethnic bubbles.
I don't really like how racism has come to be framed as a moral issue though. It shouldn't be an issue at all except within integrated cultures like the US, and only then as a matter of necessity/practicality.
It shouldn't be seen as an issue at all. This is a country based on Liberal Revolutions. Race is such a distant abstract that it's less relevant than religion in deciding whether someone is capable of integrating effectively into an American society.
Except that the elites/cabal passed the immigration act of 1965 from majority white countries to majority non-white, the Founding Fathers set up the United States as a white Christian ethnostate, and the globalists are intent upon carrying out the Kalergi plan, to literally replace and genocide white people in our own countries, and have said as much for over 100 years, the exact same people who have been promoting open borders, mass non-white immigration, diversity, multiculturalism, anti-white rhetoric and policies, affirmative action, globalist NGOs literally transporting non-whites into white countries, and attacking any white person that speaks out against this as a literal Nazi. These same sick bastards also proclaim that the Kalergi plan is a conspiracy theory pushed by white supremacists, while simultaneously tracking the decline of the white population with glee, saying that they look forward to whites becoming a minority, that it's inevitable, and that we deserve it.
First, the Hart-Celler act was passed by whites so that the Democrats could get more votes.
Second, the Founding Fathers set up the US as a Liberal Republic. Even in 1789, the US could not be considered an ethno-state, and wasn't considered an ethno-state even by the founders themselves. "White" isn't an ethnicity. Anglo, "Scott", "Irish", "Italian", "Spanish", "Portuguese" are ethnicities. And the Americans before the civil war would have found what they saw as ethnic differences between "Pennsylvanian" and "Virginian".
This Pan-European White Solidarity is a progressive racial concept that has more in common with Mr. Kalergi than it does George Washington.
This isn't about you, it isn't about race, it's about simple power.
First, the Hart-Celler act was passed by whites so that the Democrats could get more votes.
There are others involved, yes, which is why I prefer the term globalist.
Second, the Founding Fathers set up the US as a Liberal Republic. Even in 1789, the US could not be considered an ethno-state, and wasn't considered an ethno-state even by the founders themselves. "White" isn't an ethnicity. Anglo, "Scott", "Irish", "Italian", "Spanish", "Portuguese" are ethnicities. And the Americans before the civil war would have found what they saw as ethnic differences between "Pennsylvanian" and "Virginian".
To think that the people back then couldn't delineate between different races of people is asinine. Just because it wasn't a prevailing divisive topic like it is today doesn't mean they couldn't see it. They did see race, and a few of the states (Virginia for example) passed laws specifically limiting voting to white land owning men.
The founding fathers didn't explicitly detail every nuance of their intentions into the founding documents, because they didn't assume our population would become so thoroughly propagandized, corrupted, and dumbed down by our modern education and entertainment. They didn't have to say the country was for white people, because it was implied and understood by everyone. The U.S. was conquered, built, and founded by white people. They didn't have to say it. Everyone knew it. It's the same reason they weren't fully explicit and clear in the 2nd Amendment, or other Amendments which the left/globalists are trying to subvert through legalese, because the founders thought the people wouldn't be this stupid as to ignore such basic truths. The very documents that founded our nation are downstream of thousands of years of built upon legal and philosophical doctrine, going all the way back to the ancient Greeks, that is specific to Western civilization (i.e. white people). No other people on earth could've made the U.S. the way it was. It's why we can see the experiment of Liberia, which has identical founding documents to the U.S. but has resulted in a completely different outcome, because the people are different. Culture, governance, philosophy, tradition, society, they're all downstream of race. The founders knew this. It was just so blatantly obvious to everyone back then that they thought they didn't have to explicitly say it.
If they thought all peoples were equal, then this passage wouldn't have been included in the Declaration of Independence: "[King George III] has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions." If they could specifically differentiate between White people and Native Americans, and believe them to be intrinsically different, then they saw and understood race and racial differences.
If the founding fathers didn't intend the U.S. to be a White ethnostate, they wouldn't have included this language in the naturalization act of 1790: "That any alien, being a free White person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States, for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof." This means they specifically intended for the U.S. to be a white ethnostate, that they didn't differentiate between the different European nations, and they saw the commonality of the people in European nations (that they're white).
This isn't about you, it isn't about race, it's about simple power.
Yes and no. It is about power, and it's also about race. The globalists are intent upon weakening, replacing, and genociding white people so they can gain more power. White people are the most likely demographic to fight back against them. Voting stats by race support this. White people have only been brainwashed to no longer see race through the very institutions the globalists control (like schools, media, news, social media, etc.). White people now have a negative in group preference. That's deadly to the continuation of a people, hell, to any animal on earth. You're also ignoring the blatant, open, and explicitly anti-white language the globalists have used for at least the last 100 years. They didn't say they were going to ethnically replace black people, Asians, or Jews, they explicitly said white people, over and over and over.
From a strategic perspective you are right, people in America would be better served by alliances with groups that can help them promote their values instead of putting themselves in ethnic bubbles.
I don't really like how racism has come to be framed as a moral issue though. It shouldn't be an issue at all except within integrated cultures like the US, and only then as a matter of necessity/practicality.
It shouldn't be seen as an issue at all. This is a country based on Liberal Revolutions. Race is such a distant abstract that it's less relevant than religion in deciding whether someone is capable of integrating effectively into an American society.
Except that the elites/cabal passed the immigration act of 1965 from majority white countries to majority non-white, the Founding Fathers set up the United States as a white Christian ethnostate, and the globalists are intent upon carrying out the Kalergi plan, to literally replace and genocide white people in our own countries, and have said as much for over 100 years, the exact same people who have been promoting open borders, mass non-white immigration, diversity, multiculturalism, anti-white rhetoric and policies, affirmative action, globalist NGOs literally transporting non-whites into white countries, and attacking any white person that speaks out against this as a literal Nazi. These same sick bastards also proclaim that the Kalergi plan is a conspiracy theory pushed by white supremacists, while simultaneously tracking the decline of the white population with glee, saying that they look forward to whites becoming a minority, that it's inevitable, and that we deserve it.
First, the Hart-Celler act was passed by whites so that the Democrats could get more votes.
Second, the Founding Fathers set up the US as a Liberal Republic. Even in 1789, the US could not be considered an ethno-state, and wasn't considered an ethno-state even by the founders themselves. "White" isn't an ethnicity. Anglo, "Scott", "Irish", "Italian", "Spanish", "Portuguese" are ethnicities. And the Americans before the civil war would have found what they saw as ethnic differences between "Pennsylvanian" and "Virginian".
This Pan-European White Solidarity is a progressive racial concept that has more in common with Mr. Kalergi than it does George Washington.
This isn't about you, it isn't about race, it's about simple power.
There are others involved, yes, which is why I prefer the term globalist.
To think that the people back then couldn't delineate between different races of people is asinine. Just because it wasn't a prevailing divisive topic like it is today doesn't mean they couldn't see it. They did see race, and a few of the states (Virginia for example) passed laws specifically limiting voting to white land owning men.
The founding fathers didn't explicitly detail every nuance of their intentions into the founding documents, because they didn't assume our population would become so thoroughly propagandized, corrupted, and dumbed down by our modern education and entertainment. They didn't have to say the country was for white people, because it was implied and understood by everyone. The U.S. was conquered, built, and founded by white people. They didn't have to say it. Everyone knew it. It's the same reason they weren't fully explicit and clear in the 2nd Amendment, or other Amendments which the left/globalists are trying to subvert through legalese, because the founders thought the people wouldn't be this stupid as to ignore such basic truths. The very documents that founded our nation are downstream of thousands of years of built upon legal and philosophical doctrine, going all the way back to the ancient Greeks, that is specific to Western civilization (i.e. white people). No other people on earth could've made the U.S. the way it was. It's why we can see the experiment of Liberia, which has identical founding documents to the U.S. but has resulted in a completely different outcome, because the people are different. Culture, governance, philosophy, tradition, society, they're all downstream of race. The founders knew this. It was just so blatantly obvious to everyone back then that they thought they didn't have to explicitly say it.
If they thought all peoples were equal, then this passage wouldn't have been included in the Declaration of Independence: "[King George III] has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions." If they could specifically differentiate between White people and Native Americans, and believe them to be intrinsically different, then they saw and understood race and racial differences.
If the founding fathers didn't intend the U.S. to be a White ethnostate, they wouldn't have included this language in the naturalization act of 1790: "That any alien, being a free White person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States, for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof." This means they specifically intended for the U.S. to be a white ethnostate, that they didn't differentiate between the different European nations, and they saw the commonality of the people in European nations (that they're white).
Yes and no. It is about power, and it's also about race. The globalists are intent upon weakening, replacing, and genociding white people so they can gain more power. White people are the most likely demographic to fight back against them. Voting stats by race support this. White people have only been brainwashed to no longer see race through the very institutions the globalists control (like schools, media, news, social media, etc.). White people now have a negative in group preference. That's deadly to the continuation of a people, hell, to any animal on earth. You're also ignoring the blatant, open, and explicitly anti-white language the globalists have used for at least the last 100 years. They didn't say they were going to ethnically replace black people, Asians, or Jews, they explicitly said white people, over and over and over.