posted ago by HafelTruant ago by HafelTruant +39 / -1

Can anyone put together an infographic?

This should help shed some light on far-left demonisation of anyone who doesn't agree with them.

Here are some links to get you started if you're up to the task:

Archived webpages:




Comments (35)
sorted by:
NihilistCaregiver 29 points ago +29 / -0

Why? You think you're going to change someone's mind?

Woman = Good

Man = Bad

That's 2022.

WeedleTLiar 19 points ago +19 / -0

It drives me nuts how people's brains work.

They hear something on the news, with no proof; that must be true.

I tell them it isn't, with tons of evidence; I'm a conspiracy theorist.

It actually happens to them: "Did you know that this isn't true? I know because I saw it happen to my uncle!"


JustHereForTheSalmon 12 points ago +12 / -0

"NPC" is absolutely apt here. They don't have brains that work. They just accept programming and act out what the voice inside the box tells them to do.

Indipendepede 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's called the "idiot box" for a reason.

AzureAceStarburstXXX -1 points ago +1 / -2

The pedoleftist cannot be reasoned with and will never stop coming for your kids.

The "Centrist" would sooner tolerate the pedoleft status quo than you standing up for yourself.

Being good little boys and girls will not stop the enemy from wanting us genocided.

BidenLikesMiners 2 points ago +3 / -1

god, this dude. so many fucking times.


thats not right {name}


dagthegnome 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's more than that. This trial has a chance to seriously damage the credibility of the MeToo movement, and with it the power these people have to enforce ideological compliance. Not just in the entertainment industry, but in every industry with high-profile public figures in it. MeToo, just like Twitter, is one of the most important tools in their arsenal of societal control. They will defend it with everything they have, even if it means defending Amber Heard.

AnotherSchwarzesMark 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think the damage to metoo has already been done, even normies don't believe this shit and think Turd is a shit person for how she treated JD. It has become pretty mainstream and shill media is whining that their favorite toy is being taken away.

SarcasticRidley 7 points ago +7 / -0

We really need a replacement for wikipedia that isn't tainted by ideologues.

JustHereForTheSalmon 11 points ago +11 / -0

I mean we have https://infogalactic.com/ but god forbid people run a regex redirector to send Wikipedia links there instead or, even worse, type the url in the address bar.

Unknownsailor 19 points ago +19 / -0

are presenting it like people who see Depp as innocent are far right extremists

They always do that, to everyone who opposes the current Narrative™.

Once you realize that the "far right extremist" term is being used here as just a rhetorical device they use to maintain their own attitude of moral righteousness, you stop caring what they call you.

Steampunk_Moustache 16 points ago +16 / -0

lol, even twitter has daily trends all pointing to Amber Herd as a sociopath. If the userbase of TWITTER isn't buying it, nobody is.

deleted 10 points ago +12 / -2
realerfunction 5 points ago +5 / -0

has team heard offered a single medical report detailing her injuries?

Shill4Hire 2 points ago +2 / -0

Her non-existent false tears and photo-op held-in-place tissues say more than REAL evidence ever could.

RoulerBleu 12 points ago +12 / -0

They did the same thing during GamerGate.

Men bad, women victims, everyone pointing their grifting playbook in action = far-right mysoginazis.

anta_occult 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was gonna say, this is 100% gamergate 2.0 (on overdrive) and has the exact same key points: Media attempts to gaslight the world regarding the actions of a shitty woman because the narrative is that women as an oppressed group must always be right.

Because of the scope of the trial, the normie-level basis of it (as opposed to gamergate) and the positive feelings many have for Johnny, I think the Heard v Depp trial might actually make a huge difference when it comes to red pilling the world regarding the media and #metoo.

BidenLikesMiners 1 point ago +1 / -0

is heard related to literally know who? maybe theyre getting a little hollywood lesbian action going on.

the_nybbler 11 points ago +11 / -0

Depp's not even on trial here.

FrozeInFear 6 points ago +6 / -0

There's been an odd conflation in the term 'innocent' dealing with Heard being accused of defamation for herself claiming Depp abused her.
I suppose as some would see it, the guilt of one means the other is wholly innocent.

wuhan_2020_tour 2 points ago +2 / -0

Depp is on trial. He sued Amber Heard, and she counter-sued. The cases were merged into one trial. The jury has the option of finding against him.

Adamrises 9 points ago +9 / -0

Its damage control. They only barely convinced people Heard was a victim when it was only articles reporting on accusations. Now that the trial is out and celeb gossip like that draws eyes, its completely falling apart. So they are desperate to maintain what is already failed.

Because they forgot the one rule. Women's horniness comes before all things, including their safety and sisterhood. And Depp owns a lot of women's entire libidos. Heard needed an ironclad case to beat that, and was laughably bad.

Daucus9 6 points ago +6 / -0

They're just pissed because this is showing people that 1. women can lie about being abused and 2. women can be abusers themselves

So you get these feminist rags fussing over the "implications" over people horrified by what a sociopath Amber Heard is by spinning it as misogyny or some other shit.

bloodguard 4 points ago +4 / -0

The sense I get is they're both pieces of shit (narcissistic sociopaths). If I were the judge I'd sentence them to stay married and be exiled to an island so they can't fuck up anyone else's life.

Wideeyedjackal 5 points ago +5 / -0

What did Johnny do?

Fartinggoose 0 points ago +3 / -3

How about giving up 10 million dollars so he could make a movie with a wanted pedophile rapist living in exile in France? Does that sound like the sort of thing a good man does?

AnotherSchwarzesMark 4 points ago +4 / -0

The more I saw of the case the more I thought JD is actually a pretty swell guy, what's your issue with him (aside from him being an actor, actors in general I am no fan of, they are at best dancing monkeys and I don't wanna hear a monkeys opinion).

BidenLikesMiners 1 point ago +2 / -1

youtube is not evidence.

Fartinggoose -1 points ago +1 / -2

A video of the man talking is evidence no matter where it's hosted. He defended a child rapist.

Kirko 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes, and? You made the same comment on this very thread, thrice.

Fartinggoose 0 points ago +1 / -1

Guess you're a pedo huh? Don't talk bad about the pedo supporter, just ignore it!

Kirko 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh yeah, definitely Depp's fault Polanski is a child predator, he should had definitely buried the fucker, absolutely no guns pointed at his career and all and I'm most certainly a pedo.

Take your meds you colossal retard.

MegoThor 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole thing is so ridiculously one-sided against Amber Heard I sometimes think it’s an elaborate hoax to convince people that Johnny Depp isn’t a scumbag, but then I remember that no woman would willingly allow herself to look like the bad guy, so I don’t know.

nuggetpatrol 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because money is a thing and clickbait works.