Propaganda about propaganda.
(media.communities.win)
Comments (37)
sorted by:
I bet the study was in part funded by those "healthy democracies".
But did you know that those countries are ACKSHULLY happier according to a study? I always laugh at that.
I lived in Sweden for a bit, they are not happy. It's just not a Swedish thing to complain. So many of them are hella depressed. Sure, they have a bunch of "free this" and "free that" that sound appealing to your average dull lib, but that doesn't make them content or happy with themselves and their lives.
A bunch of people I met there have alcohol or other substance issues. They are aimless, feel like there is no way to motivate themselves. Their relationships are not doing great. They seem to be doing great financially because they have the typical consoomer goods you associate with a good life, but they have no savings and basically they are right on the verge of financial ruin if just one thing goes wrong. Things like that.
The WEF's ideal
citizensubject, thenAnd they have massive muslim rape gang issues, along with gangs, etc.
That's not really where it started, though. I think that's pretty much irrelevant in the sense that I have seen fucking millionaire spawns, people who never have to interact with illegal scum be just as miserable.
Like this guy, his family was all doctors and lawyers. They lived in the poshest of posh places where there were no Muzzies. None. He was still depressed as fuck.
It's really not about that. They are discouraged from standing out and such. It's considered kind of... uncomfortable if you are above average, outspoken or ambitious. They could have literally zero rapes, but the fact that you are supposed to be so muted at all times kills the drive of anyone.
Being too happy or proud is vanity and insensitive. Being too driven is being pushy and greedy. Just be sensitive to others and don't stand out.
Aye the old fashioned jantelagen, interesting if it still is a thing for the younger generation, to my knowledge the multiculturalism is forcing it away due to its not part of their culture and the clashes forces it to be a bit of dead end.
Sweden was a great place with a massive domestic production and creation market.
Just like the usa and Germany.
Now all our countries outsourced everything, destroyed the people, and are run by foreigners and feminism.
Happiness is a meme to get people obsessed with hedonism. Nobody is actually "happy" for longer than passing moments, much like lust, and acting like it is the be all of existence is one of the foundational stones of the entire Leftist movement and its promotion of degeneracy. Heck the notion of it didn't even exist in its current form until the late 18th century.
People associate happiness with a separate feeling removed from virtue, success, or the numerous other principles that make a person a "good person." But by it being so they can still convince themselves they are "good" while committing acts of degeneracy.
For example, women most often initiate divorces because they aren't happy. This allows them to justify it was a necessary thing, and to hell with the massive damage it causes to everyone else around them. But, the goal of happiness demands they do so, even when it is impossible to ever truly reach.
The Swedes and the Danes have always been bland on the outside and seething with suicidal depression on the inside, with millions of closet alcoholics wandering about, knocking into each other on their way to taking the gas pipe.
I bet they consider the healthiest democracies to be the ones with the most tranny fags.
The ones where the outcomes only elect the people they want elected.
"Democracy" is just one of those words the left redefined. It basically means "a totalitarian system in which the only acceptable opinion and parties are left-leaning globalists".
I live in a country with a massive public media apparatus (Germany). Their bias, one-sided reporting and outright propaganda is ridiculous. Even though by law they should be impartial and cater to all political leanings they're nothing but propagandists for globalist parties.
So, what are they trying to say is Iran, Russia and China, with massive public funding of media healthy democracies?!
You can see how that works in Canada. All the media that report what the government wants get funding and access. All media that criticize gets harassed by the state and have to sue to get access. Citizens that protest the government's (like the Trucker Protest) get relentlessly smeared by State Media. The state also pushes laws to censor all speech online.
What the hell is a healthy democracy anyway?
Everything being published and peer reviewed is a bunch of ass anymore.
"A new study finds"
New studies can find fucking anything you want them to find. Only GOOD studies find the truth.
The actuality of the healthy democracy is a healthy, competitive media. Not one owned by 3 mega conglomerates that also own the politicians. Controlled opposition is still state-run propaganda.
Healthier just means they do what i want. If they don't, then it's not a healthy democracy
They seem to have the relationship backwards. Modern societies that are at least somewhat stable create and fund public media. Public media does not itself create, nor necessarily foster "healthy democracy."
Of course, I would need to know how they define "public media" and "healthy democracy" first.
That isn’t satire?
I really don't like the implication that "democracy" can be bought.
Mark Zuckerberg and George Soros do.
I fucking love science!
"democracy" LOL.
"Government sponsored media makes Democracy better!"
Yeah, right.
This is what happens when society accepts feminism as sane and logical instead of insance and a cult. "Science" now have to accomodate twisted post modernist takes on everything or be labelled sexist for not including "other ways of knowing".
NPR? Fuuuuuuuuuhuhuhuuhuck YOU!