Comments (37)
sorted by:
dnile1000bc 46 points ago +46 / -0

Unfortunately this will not be news to those paying attention but good on Project Veritas for getting receipts.

NihilistCaregiver 40 points ago +40 / -0

All the people in the Eric Weinstein twitter thread who are like 'this is stupid. unfollowed'

Fucking tribal NPCs. Fuck them. Absolute wastes of oxygen.

NotAGlowy 20 points ago +20 / -0

They followed to post that

BidenLikesMiners 6 points ago +6 / -0

snowflakes care how many people are following a twitter account.

Killroyomega 28 points ago +29 / -1

It's an interesting report where the author makes the claim that the virus itself was developed as a new form of mass inoculation. Most interestingly, this idea has been floated since well before covid that various governments were working on aerosolized vaccination mechanisms for use without consent on various populations.

I could certainly see this being the case.

almond_activator 20 points ago +21 / -1

various governments were working on aerosolized vaccination mechanisms for use without consent on various populations.

The CIA also had a spray intended to make everyone they dusted with it turn into a massive faggot... and it seems like this may be related to the US-China Bioweapon somehow.

cmpunk 2 points ago +2 / -0

What makes some of us immune?

realerfunction 14 points ago +14 / -0

well are you already a faggot?

Johan_Liebert 4 points ago +4 / -0

So basically DDT us with a "vaxx".

GloboHomoErectus 3 points ago +3 / -0


If you read this it appears that covid 19 was released so that "omicron" could be later released as a vaccine.

This whole pandemic is a proof of concept so they can modify our DNA with viruses in the future..

NotAGlowy 23 points ago +25 / -2

This document is too “on the nose”

The chances that one author had evidence that Fauci funded covid19 AND that ivermectin works?

The data came originally via the DRASTIC group (last year) :



JustHereForTheSalmon 23 points ago +23 / -0

This is kind of where Project Veritas gets to cash in it's integrity equity with me. They've been extremely trustworthy over the years, and taking over 3 months for due diligence and vet the source materials sounds about right to me.

That said, as a donor, I'll reconsider my generosity if they actually got burned.

censorthisss 8 points ago +9 / -1

Yeah I'm skeptical but will give them the benefit of the doubt. I also won't use this alone as proof of anything.

cartoonericroberts 21 points ago +21 / -0

To be fair both of those facts were obvious until efforts were made to make them not obvious.

Booker 19 points ago +20 / -1

Exactly how I feel. It's a checklist of "vaccine hesitant" talking points. It confirms all my biases, altogether in one document. I just don't buy it. Even if I agree with the claims it's making, I don't think it's a credible document.

Could be wrong though. But my sense is, this is gonna get spread around with the intention of the usual rightwing suspects eating it up and sharing it, hinging their credibility on it, then it gets to be revealed to be a fake and the well gets poisoned.

deleted -7 points ago +2 / -9
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
NotAGlowy 1 point ago +3 / -2

I admit I 100% don’t understand what this document is -

All these documents were dropped off at DRASTIC last year and Project Veritas has found some way of verifying them?

subbookkeeper 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's also been out for a while so if you wait and see it'll be buried. Well it's already buried since it's been out since last year.

One thing that it's missing is an undercover video recording that Veritas normally has. If it were counter intel, it's odd because it doesn't follow further counter intel as it's relatively focused. Prior events like this have generally created weird and lurid stories that are new and distract people. Like the servers in germany and cuban embassy stuff with the election. Counter intel that confirms what is already been said seems like an odd choice. Especially when it's such a reasonable story that's come to light.

CletustheElitist 13 points ago +14 / -1

I wouldn't be surprised if this were the case but it almost seems too lax, you'd think there would be more informal jargon.

RaisingPhoenix 6 points ago +6 / -0

I thought military entities (such as DARPA) would tend to avoid such informal jargon in documents, particularly in internal stuff.

CletustheElitist -1 points ago +1 / -2

I don't know, it just strikes me as very wanton, watercooler conversation-esque even. But I dunno maybe DARPA is just cool like that.

Steampunk_Moustache 8 points ago +8 / -0


So, why'd this get out now?

Are they incompetent, or do they want to laugh at us by demonstrating how brazenly they can lie, and how they can punish anyone who doesn't believe the obvious lie?

I'm still expecting that nothing will happen.

When has anything ever happened as a result of Project Veritas blowing the lid off the official narrative?

Hope Joe Rogan covers it. That's the only chance this shit stands of getting any MSM response whatsoever.

deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
FutaCumDiet 6 points ago +7 / -1

Shame the normies don't care and the elites will never be punished.

tellmywifehello 6 points ago +6 / -0

We're just calling them spoilers now.

NotAGlowy 4 points ago +4 / -0
bangbangshootshoot 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is how they do it, slow leak, soon it'll be creeping into the mainstream, no one will do anything about it as it gradually becomes clear what happened.

ApparentlyImAHeretic 3 points ago +3 / -0

This feels too good to be real, maybe the programming is kicking in for me

justaddwater 3 points ago +3 / -0

""And ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free."" John VIII-XXXII

deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
RadioVet 4 points ago +4 / -0

As just getting over covid myself... its literally a cold. I've been way sicker for longer.