This is kind of where Project Veritas gets to cash in it's integrity equity with me. They've been extremely trustworthy over the years, and taking over 3 months for due diligence and vet the source materials sounds about right to me.
That said, as a donor, I'll reconsider my generosity if they actually got burned.
Exactly how I feel. It's a checklist of "vaccine hesitant" talking points. It confirms all my biases, altogether in one document. I just don't buy it. Even if I agree with the claims it's making, I don't think it's a credible document.
Could be wrong though. But my sense is, this is gonna get spread around with the intention of the usual rightwing suspects eating it up and sharing it, hinging their credibility on it, then it gets to be revealed to be a fake and the well gets poisoned.
It's also been out for a while so if you wait and see it'll be buried. Well it's already buried since it's been out since last year.
One thing that it's missing is an undercover video recording that Veritas normally has. If it were counter intel, it's odd because it doesn't follow further counter intel as it's relatively focused.
Prior events like this have generally created weird and lurid stories that are new and distract people. Like the servers in germany and cuban embassy stuff with the election.
Counter intel that confirms what is already been said seems like an odd choice. Especially when it's such a reasonable story that's come to light.
Fauci's response here is littered with tells. Notice his hands shaking while he responds, and he deflects and avoids actually answering the questions:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDM2OIUksKA
This document is too “on the nose”
The chances that one author had evidence that Fauci funded covid19 AND that ivermectin works?
The data came originally via the DRASTIC group (last year) :
https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/21/the-defuse-project-documents/
https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/10/preempt_hr00111880017_notes_v1_b-1.pdf
This is kind of where Project Veritas gets to cash in it's integrity equity with me. They've been extremely trustworthy over the years, and taking over 3 months for due diligence and vet the source materials sounds about right to me.
That said, as a donor, I'll reconsider my generosity if they actually got burned.
Yeah I'm skeptical but will give them the benefit of the doubt. I also won't use this alone as proof of anything.
To be fair both of those facts were obvious until efforts were made to make them not obvious.
Exactly how I feel. It's a checklist of "vaccine hesitant" talking points. It confirms all my biases, altogether in one document. I just don't buy it. Even if I agree with the claims it's making, I don't think it's a credible document.
Could be wrong though. But my sense is, this is gonna get spread around with the intention of the usual rightwing suspects eating it up and sharing it, hinging their credibility on it, then it gets to be revealed to be a fake and the well gets poisoned.
It's also been out for a while so if you wait and see it'll be buried. Well it's already buried since it's been out since last year.
One thing that it's missing is an undercover video recording that Veritas normally has. If it were counter intel, it's odd because it doesn't follow further counter intel as it's relatively focused. Prior events like this have generally created weird and lurid stories that are new and distract people. Like the servers in germany and cuban embassy stuff with the election. Counter intel that confirms what is already been said seems like an odd choice. Especially when it's such a reasonable story that's come to light.
Fauci's response here is littered with tells. Notice his hands shaking while he responds, and he deflects and avoids actually answering the questions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDM2OIUksKA
Could all be theatrics, though.