These aren't even the guys that worked with US forces. Most of the "friendlies" got left in Afghanistan alongside lists of them with biometric data that is now in the hands of the Taliban. The British were even nice enough to send the Taliban an email with names, addresses, and pictures of their former assets. The men being imported to the west are just randos that got on the planes.
Not really, on at least one military base it's literally all completely random people who passed through Taliban checkpoints and forced their way into evac planes.
Exactly, they're not looking for the right red flags. Afghanistan's Ex-Muslim Christian apostates might be safe, but the overwhelming majority of Afghans - meaning the overwhelming majority of Afghan Muslims - are incompatible with civilised society.
The fact that there is shitskin from Afghanistan should disqualify any actual vetting process, so giantfort goy is just a kike puppet with the rino script
A sane response. More of this. Proposing sensible solutions is the only way we shift the overton window back to a place where actual solutions become feasible.
If we had a real right - I mean not cuckservatives and not the GOP which is the left doing the speed limit - it wouldn't take a rape for our leadership to realize these "people" don't belong here.
Can we start putting women in prison for aiding and abetting in their own rape? This would at least fall under reckless endangerment if society was rational.
We could just reopen sanitoriums for them, they clearly are incapable of taking care of themselves or functioning as a person. Rape is a stretch of a term for this frankly, my rule is if the “victim” wasn’t drugged or has clear defensive wounds then it wasn’t rape.
All 1400 of them? You checked? No, you made it up.
By your standard, if a rapist films himself raping a woman who is clearly unwilling and repeatedly says NO, he dindu nuffin because there are no visible marks. You're at least as much of a moron and scumbag as a SJW... or even a male feminist...
If a woman is clearly unwilling there would be physical damage, or are we pretending now that rapists are kind and gentle people? Also, would you say a rape porno is clearly rape? It meets all the same conditions you just listed. The only rational way to define rape is if the woman is incapacitated, or takes or gives physical damage in order to deter the rape. Otherwise it falls into a massive gray zone that winds up with innocent men in jail because women can’t be bothered to take self responsibility.
Why are we mass importing military age men again?
Target practice once they start acting up
The food.
Well then I'm even more outraged!
No to importing afghani's and somali's.
Yes to importing mexicans, chinese, thai's, etc...
Mexicans make every kind of food except some Asian food. The Asian places that don't use Mexicans are using slave labor tho.
These aren't even the guys that worked with US forces. Most of the "friendlies" got left in Afghanistan alongside lists of them with biometric data that is now in the hands of the Taliban. The British were even nice enough to send the Taliban an email with names, addresses, and pictures of their former assets. The men being imported to the west are just randos that got on the planes.
I often find myself surprised at my being surprised given the circumstances.
Not really, on at least one military base it's literally all completely random people who passed through Taliban checkpoints and forced their way into evac planes.
They were also raping women and children at the airport already. (https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jw8EXou7/inspiring-afghan-rapefugee-doing/c/)
So what if they're fully vetted, that won't change the reality of their nature. They do not belong here.
Exactly, they're not looking for the right red flags. Afghanistan's Ex-Muslim Christian apostates might be safe, but the overwhelming majority of Afghans - meaning the overwhelming majority of Afghan Muslims - are incompatible with civilised society.
The fact that there is shitskin from Afghanistan should disqualify any actual vetting process, so giantfort goy is just a kike puppet with the rino script
Halt is competely insufficient. Deport the animals already here, how about that?
A sane response. More of this. Proposing sensible solutions is the only way we shift the overton window back to a place where actual solutions become feasible.
I don't need to spend airfare, just hang them from construction cranes in Billings
Mighty good timing there, guvnah.
Sad simp of a Governor can "call" for a halt all he wants. The people running the Biden meat puppet will just ignore him.
Start by sending your state police to arrest those Transporting the refugees. Deploy the national guard at the state lines and airports if you must.
Raping women is mild for Afghans, just wait until they start raping boys.
If we had a real right - I mean not cuckservatives and not the GOP which is the left doing the speed limit - it wouldn't take a rape for our leadership to realize these "people" don't belong here.
It would be the default position.
I wonder what the ADL has to say about this.
Can we start putting women in prison for aiding and abetting in their own rape? This would at least fall under reckless endangerment if society was rational.
You can't recklessly endanger yourself. But wanting to imprison rape victims is about the level of lunacy I expect from glowies.
We could just reopen sanitoriums for them, they clearly are incapable of taking care of themselves or functioning as a person. Rape is a stretch of a term for this frankly, my rule is if the “victim” wasn’t drugged or has clear defensive wounds then it wasn’t rape.
You'd do a great job covering up Islamic rape gangs in places like Rotherham.
They used drugs and alcohol, also physical coercion. (Including threatening to burn them.)
Where the women all had clear signs of physical abuse? Try again pookums
All 1400 of them? You checked? No, you made it up.
By your standard, if a rapist films himself raping a woman who is clearly unwilling and repeatedly says NO, he dindu nuffin because there are no visible marks. You're at least as much of a moron and scumbag as a SJW... or even a male feminist...
If a woman is clearly unwilling there would be physical damage, or are we pretending now that rapists are kind and gentle people? Also, would you say a rape porno is clearly rape? It meets all the same conditions you just listed. The only rational way to define rape is if the woman is incapacitated, or takes or gives physical damage in order to deter the rape. Otherwise it falls into a massive gray zone that winds up with innocent men in jail because women can’t be bothered to take self responsibility.
This is true for 90% of false rape claims
I dont care what you think. Majority of news reports about false rape claims are from a woman caught cheating or doing someone socially unacceptable