All 1400 of them? You checked? No, you made it up.
By your standard, if a rapist films himself raping a woman who is clearly unwilling and repeatedly says NO, he dindu nuffin because there are no visible marks. You're at least as much of a moron and scumbag as a SJW... or even a male feminist...
If a woman is clearly unwilling there would be physical damage, or are we pretending now that rapists are kind and gentle people? Also, would you say a rape porno is clearly rape? It meets all the same conditions you just listed. The only rational way to define rape is if the woman is incapacitated, or takes or gives physical damage in order to deter the rape. Otherwise it falls into a massive gray zone that winds up with innocent men in jail because women can’t be bothered to take self responsibility.
Where the women all had clear signs of physical abuse? Try again pookums
All 1400 of them? You checked? No, you made it up.
By your standard, if a rapist films himself raping a woman who is clearly unwilling and repeatedly says NO, he dindu nuffin because there are no visible marks. You're at least as much of a moron and scumbag as a SJW... or even a male feminist...
If a woman is clearly unwilling there would be physical damage, or are we pretending now that rapists are kind and gentle people? Also, would you say a rape porno is clearly rape? It meets all the same conditions you just listed. The only rational way to define rape is if the woman is incapacitated, or takes or gives physical damage in order to deter the rape. Otherwise it falls into a massive gray zone that winds up with innocent men in jail because women can’t be bothered to take self responsibility.
Absolutely batshit crazy that you think rapists who videotape their rape should go free. You're a mental case, buddy.
Imagine being so batshit crazy you’d jail a person for over a decade simply because of a woman’s claims