We could just reopen sanitoriums for them, they clearly are incapable of taking care of themselves or functioning as a person. Rape is a stretch of a term for this frankly, my rule is if the “victim” wasn’t drugged or has clear defensive wounds then it wasn’t rape.
All 1400 of them? You checked? No, you made it up.
By your standard, if a rapist films himself raping a woman who is clearly unwilling and repeatedly says NO, he dindu nuffin because there are no visible marks. You're at least as much of a moron and scumbag as a SJW... or even a male feminist...
You can't recklessly endanger yourself. But wanting to imprison rape victims is about the level of lunacy I expect from glowies.
We could just reopen sanitoriums for them, they clearly are incapable of taking care of themselves or functioning as a person. Rape is a stretch of a term for this frankly, my rule is if the “victim” wasn’t drugged or has clear defensive wounds then it wasn’t rape.
You'd do a great job covering up Islamic rape gangs in places like Rotherham.
They used drugs and alcohol, also physical coercion. (Including threatening to burn them.)
Where the women all had clear signs of physical abuse? Try again pookums
All 1400 of them? You checked? No, you made it up.
By your standard, if a rapist films himself raping a woman who is clearly unwilling and repeatedly says NO, he dindu nuffin because there are no visible marks. You're at least as much of a moron and scumbag as a SJW... or even a male feminist...